DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of the Chemical Lateral Boundary Conditions on CMAQ Simulations of Tropospheric Ozone for East Asia

동아시아지역의 CMAQ 대류권 오존 모의에 화학적 측면 경계조건이 미치는 효과

  • Hong, Sung-Chul (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Bum (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Moon, Kyung-Jung (Measure Analysis Division, Yeongsan River Basin Environment Office, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Hyun-Ju (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Hong, You-Deog (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Suk-Jo (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Song, Chang-Keun (Climate Change Research Division, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 홍성철 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 이재범 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 최진영 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 문경정 (영산강물환경연구소) ;
  • 이현주 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 홍유덕 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 이석조 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과) ;
  • 송창근 (국립환경과학원 기후변화연구과)
  • Received : 2012.07.03
  • Accepted : 2012.08.30
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

The goal of this study is to investigate the effects of the chemical lateral boundary conditions (CLBCs) on Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) simulations of tropospheric ozone for East Asia. We developed linking tool to produce CLBCs of CMAQ from Goddard Earth Observing System-Chemistry (GEOS-Chem) as a global chemistry model. We examined two CLBCs: the fixed CLBC in CMAQ (CLBC-CMAQ) and the CLBC from GEOS-Chem (CLBC-GEOS). The ozone fields by CMAQ simulation with these two CLBCs were compared to Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer (TES) satellite data, ozonesonde and surface measurements for May and August in 2008. The results with CLBC-GOES showed a better tropospheric ozone prediction than that with CLBC-CMAQ. The CLBC-GEOS simulation led to the increase in tropospheric ozone concentrations throughout the model domain, due to be influenced high ozone concentrations of upper troposphere and near inflow western and northern boundaries. Statistical evaluations also showed that the CLBC-GEOS case had better results of both the index of Agreement (IOA) and mean normalized bias. In the case of IOA, the CLBC-GEOS simulation was improved about 0.3 compared to CLBC-CMAQ due to the better predictions for high ozone concentrations in upper troposphere.

Keywords

References

  1. Bey, I., D.J. Jacob, R.M. Yantosca, J.A. Logan, B.D. Field, A.M. Fiore, Q. Li, H.Y. Liu, L.J. Mickley, and M.G. Schultz (2001) Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D19), 23,073-23,095. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807
  2. Byun, D.W. and J.K.S. Ching (1999) Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System, United States Environmental Protection Agency Rep. EPA-600/R-99/030, 727.
  3. Byun, D.W. and K.L. Schere (2006) Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Appl. Mech. Rev., 59, 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2128636
  4. Chung, S.H. and J.H. Seinfeld (2002) Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 4407, doi:10.1029/2001JD001397.
  5. Eder, B., D. Kang, R. Mathur, S. Yu, and K. Schere (2006) An operational evaluation of the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model, Atmos. Environ., 40, 4894- 4905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.062
  6. Gery, M.W., G.Z. Whitten, J.P. Killus, and M.C. Dodge (1989) A photochemical kinetic mechanism for urban and regional scale computer modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12,925-12,956. https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD10p12925
  7. Grell, G.A., J. Dudhia, and D.R. Stauffer (1994) A Description of the Fifth-Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), NCAR Technical Note. NCAR/TN- 398+STR, National center for atmospheric research, 122.
  8. Henze, D.K. and J.H. Seinfeld (2006) Global secondary organic aerosol from isoprene oxidation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09812, doi:10.1029/2006GL025976.
  9. Hogrefe, C., J. Biswas, B. Lynn, K. Civerolo, J.Y. Ku, J. Rosenthal, C. Rosenzweig, R. Goldberg, and P.L. Kinney (2004) Simulating regional-scale ozone climatology over the eastern United States: model evaluation results, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2627-2638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.033
  10. Hogrefe, C., P.S. Porter, E. Gego, A. Gilliland, R. Gilliam, J. Swall, J. Irwin, and S.T. Rao (2006) Temporal features in observed and simulated meteorology and air quality over the eastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5041-5055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.056
  11. Hong, S.-Y. and H.-L. Pan (1996) Nonlocal boundary layer vertical diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast model, Mon, Wea. Rev., 124, 2322-2339. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<2322:NBLVDI>2.0.CO;2
  12. In, H.J., D.W. Byun, R.J. Park, N.K. Moon, S. Kim, and S. Zhong (2007) Impact of trans-boundary transport of carbonaceous aerosols on the regional air quality in the Unite States: A case study of the South American wildland fire of May 1998, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D07201, doi:10.1029/2006JD007544.
  13. Jimenez, P., R. Parra, and J.M. Baldasano (2007) Influence of initial and boundary conditions for ozone modeling in very complex terrains: a case study in the northeastern Iberian Peninsula, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1294-1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.08.004
  14. Jonson, J.E., J.K. Sundet, and L. Tarrason (2001) Model calculations of present and future levels of ozone and ozone precursors with a global and a regional model, Atmos. Environ., 35, 525-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00314-9
  15. Kain, J.S. and J.M. Fritsch (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain-Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models, Edited by Emanuel, K.A. and D.J. Raymond, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Boston, U.S.A., 165-170.
  16. Liu, T.H., F.T. Jeng, H.C. Huang, E. Berger, and J.S. Chang (2001) Influences of initial condition and boundary conditions on regional and urban scale Eulerian air quality transport model simulations, Chemosphere- Global Change Sci., 3, 175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1465-9972(00)00048-9
  17. Mlawer, E.J., S.J. Taubman, P.D. Brown, M.J. Iacono, and S.A. Clough (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated- k model for the longwave, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16,663-16,682. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00237
  18. Olivier, J.G.J., J.J.M. Berdowski, J.A.H.W. Peters, J. Bakker, A.J.H. Visschedijk, and J.P.J. Bloos (2001) Applications of EDGAR. Including a description of EDGAR 3.0: reference database with trend data for 1970- 1995. RIVM, Bilthoven. RIVM report no. 773301 001/NOP report no. 410200 051.
  19. Park, R.J., D.J. Jacob, B.D. Field, R.M. Yantosca, and M. Chin (2004) Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate nitrate ammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004473
  20. Reisner, J., R.T. Bruintjes, and R.M. Rasmussen (1993) Preliminary comparisons between MM5 NCAR/Penn State model generated icing forecasts and observations. Preprints, the 5th International Conference on Aviation Weather Systems, Vienna, VA, August 2-6, 5 pp.
  21. Reisner, J., R. Rasmussen, and R. Bruintjes (1998) Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model, Q.J.R. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1071-1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712454804
  22. Samaali, M., D.M. Michael, V.S. Bouchet, R. Pavlovic, S. Cousineau, and M. Sassi (2009) On the influence of chemical initial and boundary conditions on annual regional air quality model simulations for North America, Atmos. Environ., 43, 4873-4885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.019
  23. Seinfeld, J.H. and S.N. Pandis (1997) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Wiley, New York, 1326.
  24. Song, C.K., D.W. Byun, R.B. Pierce, J.A. Alsaadi, T.K. Schaack, and F. Vukovich (2008) Downscale linkage of global model output for regional chemical transport modeling: Method and general performance, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D08308, doi:10.1029/2007JD008951.
  25. Streets, D.G., T.C. Bond, G.R. Carmichael, S.D. Fernandes, Q. Fu, D. He, Z. Klimont, S.M. Nelson, N.Y. Tsai, M.Q. Wang, J.-H. Woo, and K.F. Yarber (2003) An inventory of gaseous and primary aerosol emissions in Asia in the year 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D21), 8809, doi:10.1029/2002JD003093.

Cited by

  1. Air quality modeling guideline for national air policy development and evaluation - Part I General information - vol.22, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2013.22.5.537
  2. Simulations of Summertime Surface Ozone Over the Korean Peninsula Under IPCC SRES A2 and B1 Scenarios vol.29, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2013.29.3.251
  3. Simulation of Air Quality Over South Korea Using the WRF-Chem Model: Impacts of Chemical Initial and Lateral Boundary Conditions vol.25, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14191/Atmos.2015.25.4.639