DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Surface Fluxes Using Noah LSM and Assessment of the Applicability in Korean Peninsula

Noah LSM을 이용한 지표 플럭스 산정 및 한반도에서의 적용성 검토

  • Jang, Ehsun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Moon, Heewon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Hwang, Seok Hwan (Water Resources Research Division, Korea Institute Of Construction Technology) ;
  • Choi, Minha (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 장애선 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 문희원 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 황석환 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 최민하 (한양대학교 건설환경공학과)
  • Received : 2013.08.13
  • Accepted : 2013.10.14
  • Published : 2013.11.30

Abstract

Understanding of the exchange between the water and energy which is happening between the surface and atmosphere is the basic of studying water resources. To study these, lots of researches using Noah Land Surface Model(LSM) are in progress. Noah LSM is based on energy and water balance equation and simulates various hydrological factors. There are diverse researches with Noah LSM are ongoing in overseas, on the other hand not enough study has been done. Especially there is almost no study using uncoupled Noah LSM in Korea. In this study we used data from Korea Flux Tower in Haenam(HFK) and Gwangneung(GDK) as forcing data to simulate the model and compared its result of net radiation, sensible heat flux and latent heat flux with the observation data to assess the applicability of Noah LSM in Korea. Regression coefficients of the comparison results of Noah LSM and observation show good agreement with the value of 0.83~0.99 at Haenam and 0.64~0.99 at Gwangneung which means Noah LSM can be trusted.

지표와 대기간의 에너지 및 수문기상인자들의 교환에 대한 이해는 수자원분야의 연구에 있어서 기초라 할 수 있으며 이를 위하여 Land Surface Mode(LSM)을 활용한 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. Noah Land Surface Model (Noah LSM)은 에너지 방정식과 물수지 방정식을 기반으로 한 지면모형으로 수문기상인자들에 대한 모의가 가능하다. 국외에는 Noah LSM을 이용한 다양한 연구사례들이 있으나, 국내에서는 적용사례가 매우 부족하며, 특히 단독으로 Noah LSM을 적용한 사례는 전무한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 Noah LSM의 국내 적용성을 평가하기 위해 해남(HFK)과 광릉(GDK) Korea Flux Network (KoFlux)에서 제공하는 자료를 입력자료로 활용하여 모형 결과를 산출하고, 순 복사량, 잠열, 현열의 결과를 관측자료와 비교 검증하였다. 모형 결과와 관측치를 비교한 결과 회귀분석에서의 상관계수 값이 각 인자 별로 해남은 0.83~099, 광릉은 0.64~0.99로 신뢰할 만한 수준인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. AsiaFlux website(http://www.asiaflux.net).
  2. Adger, WN, Arnell, NW and Tompkins EL (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales, Global Environmental Change, 15, pp. 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
  3. Byun, K, Shin, J, Lee, YK and Choi, M (2013). Validation of net radiation measured for flux tower based on eddy covariance method: case study in Seolmacheon and Cheongmicheon watersheds, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 46(2), pp. 111-122. [Korean literature] https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2013.46.2.111
  4. Chang, S, Hahn D, Yang CH, Norquist D and Ek, M (1999). Validation study of the CAPS model land surface scheme using the 1987 Cabauw/PILPS dataset. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 38, pp. 405-422. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<0405:VSOTCM>2.0.CO;2
  5. Choi, M, Lee, OL and Kwon, H (2010). Understanding of the common land model performance for water and energy fluxes in a farmland during the growing season in Korea. Hydrological Processes, doi:10.1002/ hyp.7567.
  6. Dai, A, Qian, T and Trenberth, KE (2005). Has the recent global warming caused increased drying over land?, AMS 16th Symposium on Global Change and Climate Variations/Symposium on Living with a Limited Water Supply, 9-13 January 2005, San Diego, CA
  7. De Haan, LL, Kanamitsu, M, Lu, CH and Roads, JO (2007). A comparison of the Noah and OSU land surface models in the ECPC seasonal forecast model, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 8, pp. 1031-1048. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM629.1
  8. Hogue, TS, Bastidas, L, Gupta, H, Sorooshian, S, Mitchell, K and Emmerich, W (2005). Evaluation and transferability of the Noah land surface model in semiarid environments, Journal of Hydrometeorology, 6, pp. 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-402.1
  9. Hong, J, Lee, HC, Kim, J, Kim, B, Cho, C and Lee, S (2003). Inferring regional scale surface heat flux around FK KoFlux site: from one point tower measurement to MM5 mesoscale model, Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 5(2), pp. 138-149. [Korean literature]
  10. Hur, Y and Choi, M (2011). Advanced microwave scanning radiometer E soil moisture evaluation for Haenam flux monitoring network site, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(2), pp. 131-140. [Korean literature] https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2011.27.2.131
  11. Hwang, K, Choi, M, Lee, SO and Seo, JW (2013). Estimation of instantaneous and daily net radiation from MODIS data under clear sky conditions: a case study in East Asia, Irrigation Science, 31, pp. 1173-1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0396-3
  12. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  13. Kato, H, Rodell, M, Beyrich, F, Cleugh, H, Gorsel, EV, Liu, H and Meyers, TP (2007). Sensitivity of land surface simulations to model physics, land characteristics, and forcing at four CEOP sites, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 85(A), pp. 187-204. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85.187
  14. Kim, HT, Kim, YH and Um, HH (2003). Surface flux observation in Haenam using eddy-covariance method, Proceeding of the 35th Meeting of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment, pp 415-416. [Korean literature]
  15. Kustas, WP and Norman, JM (1996). Use of remote sensing for evapotranspiration monitoring over land surfaces, Hydrological Sciences, 41, pp. 495-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626669609491522
  16. Kwon, BH, Kim, GH, Kim, KH and Kang, DH (2009). Role of atmospheric turbulences and energy balances in the atmospheric surface layer, Journal of Wetlands Reaserch, 11(1), pp. 105-113. [Korean literature]
  17. Kwon, H (2009). Estimation of net radiation in three different plant functional types in Korea, Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 11(2), pp. 79-85. [Korean literature] https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2009.11.2.079
  18. Liang, XZ, Wood, EF, Lettenmaier, DF, Lohmann, D, Boone, A, Chang, S, Chen, F, Dai, Y, Desborough, C, Dickinson, RE, Duan, Q, Ek, M, Gusev, YM, Habets, F, Irannejad, P, Koster, R, Mitchell, KE, Nasonova, ON, Noilhan, J, Schaake, J, Schlosser, A, Shao, Y, Shmakin, AB, Verseghy, D, Warrach, K, Wetzel, P, Xue, Y, Yang, Z and Zeng, Q (1998). The project for intercomparison of land-surface parameterization schemes (PILPS) phase-2c Red-Arkansas river basin experiment: 2. Spatial and temporal analysis of energy fluxes, Global and Planetary Change, 19(1-4), pp. 137-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8181(98)00045-9
  19. Moulin, S, Bondeau, A and Delecolle, R (1998). Combining agricultural crop models and satellite observations: from field to regional scales, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(6), pp. 1021-1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215586
  20. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology (NIAST). (2000). Taxonomical Classification of Korean Soils, No. 11-1390093-00049-01, Rural Development Administration.
  21. Radell, DB and Rowe, CM (2008). An observational analysis and evaluation of land surface model accuracy in the Nebraska sand hills, Journal of Hydrology, 9, pp. 601-621.
  22. Sridhar, V, Elliott, RL and Chen, F (2003). Scaling effects on modeled surface energy-balance components using the NOAH-OSU land surface model, Journal of Hydrology, 208, pp. 105-123.
  23. Sridhar, V, Elliott, RL, Chen, F and Brotzge, JA (2002). Validation of the NOAH-OSU land surface model using surface flux measurements in Oklahoma, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, doi:10.1029/ 2001JD001306.
  24. Wei, H, Xia, Y, Mitchell, KE and Ek, MB (2012). Improvement of the Noah land surface model for warm season process: evaluation of water and energy flux simulation, Hydrological Processes, doi:10.1002/ hyp.9214.

Cited by

  1. Estimation of Land Surface Energy Fluxes using CLM and VIC model vol.18, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.2.166
  2. Prediction of future hydrologic variables of Asia using RCP scenario and global hydrology model vol.49, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.6.551