DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Roles of IPP Professor for Successful Operations of IPP System : Based on KOREATECH Case Study

장기현장실습 제도의 성공적인 운영을 IPP 전담교수의 역할 : 한국기술교육대학교 사례를 중심으로

  • Oh, Chang-Heon (School of Electrical, Electronics & communication Engineering, KOREATECH)
  • 오창헌 (한국기술교육대학교 전기전자통신공학부)
  • Received : 2013.10.19
  • Accepted : 2013.11.15
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

In this paper, we suggest the roles of IPP (Industry Professional Practice) professor that are necessary for efficient and systematic operation and management of IPP system, which has been implemented by KOREATECH recently under the goal of nurturing industry-oriented talents with practical skills, based on the analysis of actual operational practices of advanced overseas universities and the IPP experiences for 2 years. The roles of IPP professor are largely divided into the following three: IPP manager; student career counselor; educator of IPP educational program. During the initial stage of IPP system, the role of IPP manager is most significant. However, as the system is systematically managed and operated, the role of IPP manager gradually decreases, and the role of career counselor becomes more important. Since IPP system is an educational program that gives credits, IPP professor should also perform the role of educator, including designing experiential learning curriculum and evaluation on educational goal accomplishment.

본 연구에서는 한국기술교육대학교가 최근 현장중심의 실무형 인재 양성을 목표로 혁신적으로 추진하고 기업연계형 장기현장실습 (IPP: Industry Professional Practice) 제도의 효율적이고 체계적인 운영 및 관리를 위해 필요한 IPP 전담교수의 역할에 대해 해외 선진국 운영사례 분석 및 실제 IPP 제도 2년간의 운영 경험을 바탕으로 제안한다. IPP 전담교수의 역할은 크게 3가지로 구분된다. 첫 번째는 IPP 관리자로서의 역할이며, 두 번째는 학생들에 대한 진로지도 상담자의 역할이며, 세 번째는 IPP 교육 프로그램에 대한 교육자로서의 역할이다. IPP 제도 시행 초기에는 주로 IPP 관리자로서의 역할이 중요하지만 IPP 제도가 체계적으로 관리되고 운영되면 IPP 관리자로서의 역할은 점차 줄어들고 진로지도 상담자로서의 역할이 더 중요해진다. IPP 제도가 학점을 부여하는 교육 프로그램인 만큼 IPP 전담교수는 경험학습 설계, 교육목표 달성도 평가 등 교육자로서의 역할도 수행해야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. G. J. Jang, J. K. Jung, S. C. Seo, and B. K. Shin, "A study on the introduction method of industry-university cooperation degree/non-degree related system," Seoul: KIEC, 2006.
  2. C. W. Park, C. W. Lee, and S. C. Park, Korean Engineering Education Issues and Overseas Examples of Successful University and Industry Relationships. Seoul: Poornsasang, 2008.
  3. C. H. Oh, J. H. Ha, N. H. Kim, and M. S. Lee, Case Study of University's Co-op Models and its Proliferation Method. KOREATECH HRD R&D Center, 2012.
  4. V. Apostolides and J. W. Looye, "Student assessment of the co-op experience and optimum integration of classroom learning with professional practice," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 16-30, 1997
  5. K. L. Dowdle, "A students' perspective on cooperative education exchange schemes: my time with slime," in Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Cooperative Education. Melbourne, Australian Cooperative Education Society, pp. 605-610, 1996.
  6. J. W. Wilson, "Reflections on what a coordinator is," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 57-61, 1972.
  7. W. B. Mosbacker, "The role of the coordinator," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 28-37, 1969.
  8. C. Pratt, "Toward an identity: The nature of the cooperative education professional," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18-24, 1973.
  9. J. Gerrand and H. Saunderson, "Compulsory versus optional cooperative programs," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 46-56, 1994.
  10. J. W. Wilson, Creating & Initiating a Cooperative Education Program. Boston, MA: World Association for Cooperative Education, 1997.
  11. P. Linklater, Education and the World of Work: Positive Partnerships. Stoney Stratford: Open University Press, 1987.
  12. N. Colling, "Cooperative education in times of high unemployment: a Cape Technikon perspective," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 26-35, 1994
  13. R. K. Coll, C. Eames, and E. Halsey, "Keeping the customer satisfied: A survey of student satisfaction," Journal of Cooperative Education, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 31-40, 1997.
  14. R. W. Tyler, Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction: Syllabus for Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
  15. S. Lee, C. H. Oh, N. H. Kim, and J. H. Ha, "A study on the performance evaluation model for successful introduction and operations for IPP program," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 86-92, Jun. 2012.