Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (대한간호학회지)

Korean Society of Nursing Science (한국간호과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Validity of Instrument Development Research in Korean Nursing Research

한국의 도구개발 간호연구에서의 타당도에 대한 고찰

  • Lee, Kyunghee (Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Science, Ewha Woman's University) ;
  • Shin, Sujin (Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 이경희 (이화여자대학교 건강과학대학 간호과학부) ;
  • 신수진 (순천향대학교 의과대학 간호학과)
  • Received : 2013.10.01
  • Accepted : 2013.11.15
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This integrative review study was done to analyze methods used for validation studies in Korean nursing research. Methods: In this study, the literature on instrument development in nursing research from Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) and major nursing journal databases in Korea were examined. The MeSH search terms included 'nursing', 'instrument', 'instrument development', 'validation' and 189 articles were included in the review. Results: The most frequently reported validity type was content validity, followed by construct validity, and criterion validity. One third reported a single type of validity, and 15% of the studies demonstrated three kinds of validity at the same time. In about 40% of the studies, both content and construct validity were examined. Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to provide a wider variety of evidence to establish whether instruments are valid enough to use in nursing research.

Keywords

References

  1. American Educational Research Association [AERA], American Psychological Association [APA], & National Council on Measurement in Education [NCME]. (1999). The standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA Publications.
  2. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
  3. Carnevale, T. (2011). An integrative review of adolescent depression screening instruments: Applicability for use by school nurses. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 24(1), 51-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2010.00256.x
  4. Choi, S. H., Lee, E. J., Park, M. J., Kim, H. S., Kim, M. H., & Choi, J. Y. (2012). Nursing outcomes measurement indicators. Gwangju: Chonnam National University Press.
  5. Choi, S. J., Bae, S. Y., Choi, J. Y., & Bang, H. J. (2006). Development and predictive validity of pressure ulcer predicting scale for patients with neurologic condition. Clinical Nursing Research, 11(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106059793
  6. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
  7. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  8. DeVellis, R. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  9. Foster, R. L., & Park, J. H. (2012). An integrative review of literature examining psychometric properties of instruments measuring anxiety or fear in hospitalized children. Pain Management Nursing, 13(2), 94-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2011.06.006
  10. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  11. Hopfenbecka, T. N., & Maul, A. (2011). Examining evidence for the validity of PISA learning strategy scales based on student response processes. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 95-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080 /15305058.2010.529977 https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2010.529977
  12. Ju, H. O., Lee, N. Y., Park, I. S., Lee, S. O., & Kim, S. H. (2009). Development & validation of a checklist for infant and child developmental screening. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 15(1), 34-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.4094/jkachn.2009.15.1.34
  13. Kane, M. T. (2000). Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(4), 319-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745- 3984.2001.tb01130.x
  14. Kang, H. (2013). A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587- 594. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  15. Kim, K. N., Kim, C. H., Kim, K. I., Yoo, H. J., Park, S. Y., & Park, Y. H. (2012). Development and validation of the Korean nursing delirium scale. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(3), 414-423. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.3.414
  16. Lee, E. O., Im, N. Y., Park, H. A., Lee, I. S., Kim, J. I., Bae, J., et al. (2009). Nursing research and statistical analysis (4th ed.). Paju: Soomoonsa.
  17. Lee, I., Park, Y. I., Park, E., Lee, S. H., & Jeong, I. S. (2011). Validation of instruments to classify the frailty of the elderly in community. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 22(3), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.3.302
  18. Lee, W. (2008). Unified view on validity. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(4), 67-79.
  19. Park, H. A. (2005). Problem and issues in developing measurement scales in nursing. Journal of Nursing Query, 14(1), 46-72.
  20. Pett, M. A., Lackey, N. R., & Sullivan, J. J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  21. Ribeiro, M. A. S., Vedovato, T. G., de Moraes Lopes, M. H. B., Monteiro, M. I., & de Brito Guirardello, E. (2013). Validation studies in nursing: Integrative review. Rev Rene, 14(1), 218-228.
  22. Seong, T. J. (2002). Validity and reliability. Seoul: Hakjisa Publisher.
  23. Shin, H., Kim, J., & Lim, S. (2007). A study to validate the Korean child development review. Journal of Korean Academy of Child Health Nursing, 13(2), 222-229.
  24. Shin, H., Kwon, B., & Lim, S. (2005). Validity of Korean version of denver II in screening children with developmental risk. Korean Journal of Child Health Nursing, 11(3), 316-321.
  25. So, A. Y., & Cho, B. H. (2002). Development of a home care need assessment tool: Focused on home care nursing diagnoses based on self care. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 13(3), 433-443.
  26. Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

Cited by

  1. 한국판 노인불안도구(K-GAI)의 신뢰도와 타당도 vol.21, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5953/jmjh.2014.21.1.75
  2. 자폐성장애 아동 부모의 삶의 전환과정 측정도구에 대한 구성타당도 평가 vol.44, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2014.44.5.563
  3. 간호사가 인지하는 간호관리자의 윤리적 리더십 측정 도구 K-ELW의 타당화 연구 vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.240
  4. 간호대학생을 위한 회복탄력성 도구 개발 vol.27, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.3.337
  5. Development and Clinical Validity of a Mild Vascular Cognitive Impairment Assessment Tool for Korean Stroke Patients vol.9, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.04.005
  6. 한국판 주산기 외상 후 스트레스장애 척도의 신뢰도 및 타당도 vol.46, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.1.29
  7. 근로자를 위한 웰니스지표 개발 vol.46, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.1.69
  8. 간호사가 경험하는 직장 내 괴롭힘 결과 측정도구 개발 vol.17, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.2.479
  9. 간호사의 범문화효능감 측정도구 개발 및 타당화 vol.46, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.2.293
  10. 수술실 간호사 안전역량 도구의 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증 vol.17, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2016.17.10.345
  11. 기업건강증진지수의 준거타당도 평가 vol.26, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5807/kjohn.2017.26.1.1
  12. 시뮬레이션 실습에서 학습성과 평가도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 -여성건강 간호학 실습에서 비판적 추론과정을 통한 간호과정 적용(학습성과)을 중심으로- vol.18, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.4.154
  13. 임상간호사의 병원폭력에 대한 태도 측정도구 신뢰도, 타당도 재검증 vol.18, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.8.135
  14. 한국어판 임상학습환경과 슈퍼비전, 임상실습지도교수(CLES+T) 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 vol.48, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2018.48.1.70
  15. Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Families' Importance in Nursing Care-Pediatric Nurses' Attitudes Instrument vol.24, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2018.24.3.274
  16. 임신 위험 증상 지각 측정도구 개발 vol.24, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2018.24.3.297
  17. 임상간호사의 환자안전 간호활동 측정도구 개발 vol.16, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2018.16.9.207
  18. 만성 뇌졸중 환자를 위한 일상생활활동 스마트폰 어플리케이션 사용성 평가 vol.14, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2019.14.1.151
  19. 간호대학생의 전환충격 척도 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증 연구 vol.25, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2019.25.1.17
  20. 한국어판 자기관리 측정도구(Partners In Health scale)의 타당도 및 신뢰도 분석 vol.12, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2019.12.2.1
  21. 한국어판 간호대학생 임상의사결정능력 자신감과 불안 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 vol.49, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.4.411
  22. 클라우드 사용의도에 영향을 미치는 개인특성 연구 vol.26, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2019.26.3.135
  23. 융합 시대의 의료종사자를 위한 단축형 생명의료윤리 도구 개발 및 평가 vol.18, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2020.18.1.219
  24. 플랫폼 서비스 충성도에 영향을 미치는 개인특성연구 vol.27, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2020.27.2.051
  25. 치매대상자를 돌보는 간호사의 의사소통행위 측정도구의 타당도 및 신뢰도 융합 연구 vol.11, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2020.11.5.327
  26. Analysis of Equivalence and Reliability of Korean Translated Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefits vol.16, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21848/asr.200025
  27. 간호사의 법의간호 역량 측정도구 개발 vol.13, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.34250/jkccn.2020.13.3.24
  28. Development and Validation of a Self-control Competency Scale for Late-school-aged Children vol.26, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2020.26.4.411
  29. 간호대학생의 한국어판 윤리적 민감성 측정도구 타당도와 신뢰도 vol.31, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2020.31.4.503
  30. Validation of the Korean Version of the Nursing Profession Self-Efficacy Scale: A Methodological Study vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031080
  31. The Psychological Responses of Nurses Caring for COVID-19 Patients: A Q Methodological Approach vol.18, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073605
  32. 중소병원 적정성 평가를 담당하는 간호사의 지식 및 교육 요구도 vol.28, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5953/jmjh.2021.28.1.18
  33. The Development and Validation of a Perceived Nursing Support Scale for Mothers of Preterm Infants vol.15, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2021.10.002