DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of gas hydrate process on energy saving for reverse osmosis process in seawater desalination plant

해수담수화플랜트에서 가스 하이드레이트 공정 도입을 통한 역삼투 공정의 에너지 절감 효과

  • Received : 2013.11.26
  • Accepted : 2013.12.11
  • Published : 2013.12.15

Abstract

Gas hydrate (GH) process is a new desalination technology, where GH is a non- stoichiometric crystalline inclusion compounds formed by water and a number of gas molecules. Seawater GH is produced in a low temperature and a high pressure condition and they are separated from the concentrated seawater. The drawback of the GH process so far is that salt contents contained in its product does not meet the fresh water quality standard. This means that the GH process is not a standalone process for seawater desalination and it needs the help of other desalting process like reverse osmosis (RO). The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of GH process on energy saving for RO process in seawater desalination. The GH product water quality data, which were obtained from a literature, were used as input data for RO process simulation. The simulation results show that the energy saving effect by the GH process is in a range of 68 % to 81 %, which increases as the salt removal efficiency of the GH process increases. Boron (B) and total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations of the final product of the hybrid process of GH and RO were also investigated through the RO process simulation to find relavant salt rejection efficiency of the GH process. In conclusion, the salt rejection efficiency of the GH process should exceed at least 78% in order to meet the product water quality standards and to increase the energy saving effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Cath, T .Y., Childress, A.E., Elimelech, M. (2006) Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments, J. Membr. Sci., 281, 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.048
  2. Dow Li quid Separation (1995), Filmtec reverse osmosis membranes: Technical manual, Form No. 609-00071-0705, The Dow Chemical Company.
  3. Hydran autics webpage, http://www.membranes. com
  4. Khayet , M., Matsuura, T. (2011) Membrane Distillation- Principles and applications, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
  5. KICTE P (2012) Report of R&D plan for hybrid seawater desalination plant, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime.
  6. McCormack, R.A., Andersen, R.K. (1995) Clathrate desalination plant preliminary research study, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
  7. McCormack, R.A., Niblock, G.A. (1998) Build and operate clathrate desalination pilot plant, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
  8. McCormack, R.A., Niblock, G.A. (2000) Investigation of high freezing temperature, zero ozone, and zero global warming potential, clathrate formers for desalination, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
  9. Ngan, Y.T., Englezos, P. (1996) Concentraton of mechanical pulp mill effluents and NaCl solutions through propane hydrate formation, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35, 1894-1900. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie960001t
  10. Park, K.N., Hong, S.Y., Lee, J.W., Kang, K.C., Lee, Y.C., Ha, M.G., Lee, J.D. (2011) A new apparatus for seawater desalination by gas hydrate process and removal characteristics of dissolved minerals (Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+, K+, B3+), Desalination, 274, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.01.084
  11. Sloan Jr., E.D. (1998) Clathrate Hydrates of Natural Gases, Second Edition Revised and Expanded, Marcel Dekker, NY.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of energy consumption of gas hydrate and reverse osmosis hybrid system for seawater desalination vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2016.30.4.459
  2. Evaluation of water permeability of forward osmosis membranes using osmotically driven membrane test vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2016.30.4.417
  3. Reliability Assessment of Reverse Osmosis System Projection Programs vol.41, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2019.41.1.42