Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship between Work-Family Facilitation and Organizational Commitment: Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support

일-가정 촉진과 조직몰입 간의 관계: 조직지원인식의 조절효과

  • Jung, Se-Hee (Dept. of Business Administration, Dong-A University) ;
  • Son, Ah-Jin (Dept. of Business Administration, Dong-A University) ;
  • Cha, Yunsuk (Dept. of Business Administration, Dong-A University)
  • Received : 2013.11.11
  • Accepted : 2013.12.20
  • Published : 2013.12.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study defined that the construct of work-family is not the opposite meaning but the construct having positive synergy effects each other. For more meaningful implications to HR partitioner in the era of smart working, Data collection was done from the manufacturing companies in Kyungsangnamdo and hierarchical regression was conducted. we investigated the relationship between work-family facilitation and organizational commitment and moderating effect of perceived organizational support between work-family facilitation and organizational commitment. Based on the result, we have proposed some implications. First, we should study more detail processes between work-family facilitation and organizational commitment not only continuous commitment but also affective and normative commitment. Second, we could know that not only work-family balance but also work-family facilitation could positively impact on organizational commitment, there when we design the job of employees, we should consider the family issues of job holder.

본 연구에서는 일(work)-가정(family)은 대립적 관계가 아닌 서로 보완적 관계이며, 이들 간의 긍정적 상호작용이 조직 및 개인 성과에 긍정적 영향을 주는 일-가정 촉진(work-family facilitation)이 조직몰입에 긍정적 영향이 있음을 실증적으로 파악함으로써 스마트워킹시대 인사 관리자들에게 조직관리의 새로운 시사점을 제공하고자 진행되었다. 이를 위해 부산 경남지역의 일반 기업체 근무자를 대상으로 설문 조사 후 위계적회귀분석을 실시 하였다. 연구결과 일-가정 촉진은 조직몰입에 정(+)의 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 일-가정 촉진과 조직몰입 간의 조직지원인식의 조절효과는 지속적 몰입을 제외한 정서적 및 규범적 몰입에는 통계적으로 유의한 정(+)의 효과는 없는 것으로 나타났다. 학술적으로는 조직지원인식이 구성원들의 지속적 몰입에 긍정적 관계가 있음을 확인 하였을 뿐만 아니라 더 나아가 일-가정 촉진과 정서적 및 규범적 몰입 간의 긍정적 관계를 설명할 수 있는 추가 메커니즘 연구의 필요성을 제시하였고, 실무적으로는 일-가정 균형 뿐만 아니라 일-가정 촉진, 즉 일과 가정 간의 긍정적 상호작용이 조직 및 개인의 성과에 긍정적 영향을 미친다는 것을 확인함으로써 직무설계시 직무 뿐만 아니라 개인의 가족 상황을 고려한 설계 필요성을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. N. Allen & J. Meyer (1990), "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization," Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  2. S. Aryee, E. S. Srinivas., & H. H. Tan (2005), "Rhythms of Life: Antecedents and outcomes of work-family alance in employed parents," Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 132-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.132
  3. R. C. Barnett & J. S. Hyde (2001), "Women, men, work, and family: An expansionist theory," American Psychologist, 56, 781-796. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.10.781
  4. B. Barocas (2005). "The role of information and communication technology in balancing work and family: Individual and organizational effects and implications," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, NY.
  5. T. E. Becker, R. S. Billings, D. M. Eveleth, & N. Gilbert (1996). "Foci and bases of employee commitment: Implications for job performance," Academy of Management Journal, 39, 464-482. https://doi.org/10.2307/256788
  6. S. Boyer & Jr. D. Mosley (2007), "The relationship between core-self-evaluations and work-family conflict and facilitation," Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(2), 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.06.001
  7. S. Caudron (1997). "Surveys illustrate the business case for work/life programs," Workforce, 1-2.
  8. Z. Chen, R. Eisenberger, K. Johnson, I. Sucharski, & J. Aselage (2009), "Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: which leads to which?," Journal of social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.1.119-124
  9. R. Eisenberger, R. Huntington, S. Huchison, & D. Sowa (1986). "Perceived organizational support," Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  10. M. Frone (2003). "Work-family balance," In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of Occupational Health Psychology,. Washington: American Pyschological Association, 142-163.
  11. J. Greenhaus & G. Powell (2006), "When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment," Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.19379625
  12. J. Grzywacz (2000). "Work-family spillover and health during midlife: Is managing conflict everything?," American Journal of Health Promotion, 14, 236-243. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-14.4.236
  13. B. Guetk, S. Searle, & L. Klepa (1991). "Rational versus gender role-explanations for work-family conflict," Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 560-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.4.560
  14. J. Hays & A. Hill (2006)." Service guarantee strength: The key to service quality," Journal of Operations Management, 24, 753-764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2005.08.003
  15. I. Hwang & J. Son (2010) "KT's workplace revolution 'Smart Work," Daily Economic Newspaper, August 24, A15.
  16. T. Heskett, L. James, Jones, Thomas O., Loveman, Gary W., Sasser Jr, W. Earl, & Schlesinger, Leonard A. (1994). "Putting thes service-profit chain to work,". Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 164-170.
  17. K. Jung & E. Jang (2005), "A study on the work-family balance based on the family friendly policy," Korean Home Management Association, 22(5), 91-100.
  18. H. Kim & W. Cha (2010), "The effect of work-family interaction and family-friendly organizational support on organizational commitment and turnover intention," Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 515-540.
  19. D. Lee & Y. Yoo (2011), "The effect of delegation and perceived organizational support on organizational identification and contextual performance," Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 183-206. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.24.1.201102.183
  20. A. Oh, K. Park, & H. Ong (2013). "The relationship of perceived organizational support and deviant behavior in the workplace: The mediating effect of affective commitment and the moderating effect of organization-based self-esteem," Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 26(1), 119-147. https://doi.org/10.24230/ksiop.26.1.201302.119
  21. L. Rhoades, R. Eisenberger, & S. Armeli (2001), "Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support," Journal of Applied psychology, 86(5), 825-836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.825
  22. S. Rucci, J. Anthony, & Quinn, Richard T. (1998). "The employee-customer-profit chain at sears," Harvard Business Review, 76, 82-97.
  23. L. Shore & T. Shore (1995), "Perceived Organization support and organization justice," In R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar(Eds.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace, Westport, CT.: Quorum, 149-164.
  24. L. Shore & S. Wayne (1993), "Commitment and employee behavior: Comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support,". Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(5), 774-780. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.774
  25. S. Wayne, L. Shore, & R. Liden (1997), "Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective," Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 82-111. 6, 108-130. https://doi.org/10.2307/257021
  26. R. Yee, W. Y., Yeung, A. C. L., & Edwin, C.. T. C. (2010). "An empirical study of employee loyalty, service quality and firm performance in the service industry," International Journal of Production Economics, 124, 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.015

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Development of Phased Big Data Distribution Model Based on Big Data Distribution Ecology vol.14, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.5.95
  2. A Study on the Application Method of Munition's Quality Information based on Big Data vol.17, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.6.315
  3. The effects of Social Intelligence and Burnout on Turnover Intention in Nurses : An exploratory study vol.14, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.4.325
  4. Extracting week key issues and analyzing differences from realtime search keywords of portal sites vol.14, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.12.237
  5. The Effects of Mobile Smart-Work IT Resources of Resource Based View on the Work Efficiency : based on moderating effects of the perceived usefulness vol.14, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.7.93