DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Green BIM based Atrium Sizes in the Early Design Stage

Green BIM기반 초기설계 단계에서 타입별 아트리움의 규모산정에 관한 연구

  • Jeong, Seung-Woo (School of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kweon-Hyoung (School of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, In-Han (Department of Architecture Engineering, Kyung Hee National University) ;
  • Choo, Seung-Yeon (School of Architecture & Civil Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • 정승우 (경북대학교 건축.토목공학부) ;
  • 이권형 (경북대학교 건축.토목공학부) ;
  • 김인한 (경희대학교 토목건축대학) ;
  • 추승연 (경북대학교 건축.토목공학부)
  • Received : 2012.12.03
  • Accepted : 2013.01.08
  • Published : 2013.02.01

Abstract

This study for establishing specific standards of atrium design aims to discuss design of atrium to consider energy performance atrium in office buildings. In order to evaluate a type and a scale of atrium at the early design stage, modeling details of mass design were set as standards of conceptual design. In the experiment, Project Vasari was used to analyze modeling and energy consumption, based on the LOD 100-step suggested by AIA, because there is no guideline to specify a level of modeling details at each design process. From this analysis, the correlation among a simple-typed atrium and scale and energy load was considered. The result of this research is as follows: First, the single-sided atrium reduced energy the most, and it was followed by three-sided, two-sided, four-sided and continuous-typed ones. On the whole, they could decrease energy by up to about 15%. Also, the atrium with a wide facade facing in the south was more favorable to reduce energy. Second, planning the atrium within 10~30% of the whole building area was more energy efficient. Third, rather than the depth, adjusting the length in designing an atrium could reduce cooling and heating loads by 1.5% per 1m. As explained above, energy performance evaluation considering types and planning elements of atrium helps to assess alternatives in a reasonable way. In particular, considering the use of building needs to be preceded to select a type of atrium, although it is also important to consider its planning elements.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2008, Energy-saving Design Standards of the Building, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs Notice 2008-652.
  2. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2009, Based on the Equipment of the Building Rules, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs Notice 205.
  3. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, 2009, Certification Standards of the Green Building, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs Notice 2009-1294.
  4. Kim, M.-K., Choi, H.-A. and Jun, H.-J., 2009, A Study on the BIM Application of Domestic Green Building Assessment System, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), pp. 339-342.
  5. Moon, C.-Y., Choi, M.-S. and Park, S.-H., 2009, A Case Study on BIM Based Building Energy Performance Evaluation, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), pp. 697-700.
  6. Woo, K.-H. and Kim, J.-M., 2009, Development of BIM-Based Building Energy Performance Tool: Samsung Energy Performance (SEP), Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 25(12), pp. 113-120.
  7. Lee, K.-H., Kim, I.-H. and Choo, S.-Y., 2011, A Study on Improvement of Energy Performance Index in Green Building Certification System using BIM, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 27(9), pp. 13-21.
  8. Lee, J.-Y. and Lee, K.-S., 2010, Study on Examples of Sustainable Environment Application in Atrium Space, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(9), pp. 123-132.
  9. Jang, W.-J. and Jun, H.-J. 2009, A Study of Green Building Technology Using a BIM Process is Possible, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), pp. 331-334.
  10. Choo, S.-Y., Lee, K.-H. an Park, S.-K., 2012, A Study on LOD(Level of Development) for Development of Green BIM Guidelines - Focused on Energy Performance Estimation -, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 28(6), pp. 37-47.
  11. AIA, AIA Document E202TM-2008.
  12. Rainer Hascher et al., 2002, Office Buildings: A Design Manual, Birkhauser.
  13. Richard Saxon, 1994, Atrium Architecture, Kimoondang, pp. 8494.
  14. Arno Schlueter, Frank Thesseling, 2009, Building Information Model based Energy/Exergy Performance Assessment in Early Design Stages, Automation in Construction 18, pp. 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.003
  15. Norbert Lechner, 2008, Heating, Cooling, Lighting: Sustainable Design Methods for Architects, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  16. Salman Azhar and Justin Brown, Rizwan Farooqui, 2008, BIM-based Sustainability Analysis: An Evaluation of Building Performance Analysis Software, Auburn University.
  17. U.S. Green Building Council, 2001, LEED "Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design", Green Building Rating System.
  18. http://appsl.eere.energy.gov
  19. http://kostat.go.kr
  20. http://wikihelp.autodesk.com
  21. http://www.gsa.gov/bim