International journal of steel structures (국제강구조저널)

Korean Society of Steel Construction (한국강구조학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytical Models for the Initial Axial Tensile Stiffness and Ultimate Tensile Load of a T-Stub, Including the Effects of Prying Action

  • Yang, Jae-Guen (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Kwang (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering) ;
  • Park, Jae-Ho (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering) ;
  • Back, Min-Chang (Department of Architectural Engineering, College of Engineering)
  • Published : 2013.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A T-stub with a thin flange and a wider high-strength bolt gauge distance generally fails due to the yield of the flange. Since prying action greatly influences a T-stub with such failure characteristics, its effects must be considered in estimating the failure aspects, stiffness, and strength of a T-stub. To accurately determine the effects of a prying action applied to a T-stub and to reflect them in a design, however, the contacts, bearing, concentrated stress, and plastic hinges, among complex submaterials, should first be accurately examined and quantified. Thus, this study aimed to explain better the complex phenomena that influence the effects of prying action by conducting an axial tensile force test and a three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of a T-stub and proposing an improved analytical model for estimating the initial axial tensile stiffness and the ultimate tensile load of a T-stub, including the effects of prying action on it.

Keywords

References

  1. ABAQUS (2007) User's Manual. Version 6.9. Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., Pawtucket, USA.
  2. Barron, J. and Bickford, J. H. (1998). Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints: Computing the Stiffness of a Fastener. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA.
  3. Chen, W. F. and Lui, E. M. (1991). Stability design of steel frames. CRC Press, Florida, USA.
  4. Faella, C., Piluso, V., and Rizzano, G. (2000). Structural steel semi-rigid connections: Theory, design, and software. CRC Press, Florida, USA.
  5. Jaspart, J. P. (1991). Etude de la semi-rigidite des noeuds poutre-colonne et son influence sur la resistance et la stabilite des ossatures en acier. Unpublished doctoral Dissertation, University of Liige, Belgique (in Language).
  6. Kulak, G. L., Fisher, J. W., and Struik, J. H. A. (2001). Guide to Design Criteria for Bolted and Riveted Joints. 2nd Ed., AISC.
  7. Lemonis, M. E. and Gantes, C. J. (2006). "Incremental modeling of T-stub connections." Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 1(7), pp. 1135-1159. https://doi.org/10.2140/jomms.2006.1.1135
  8. Richard, R. M., Hisa, W. K., Chmieelowiec, M. (1988). "Derived moment-rotation curves for double-framing angles." Comput & Struct, 3, pp. 485-494.
  9. Swanson, J. A. (1999). Characterization of the Strength, Stiffness, and Ductility Behavior of T-stub Connections. Ph. D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA.
  10. Swanson, J. A., Kokan, D. S., and Leon, R. T., (2002) . "Advanced finite element modeling of bolted T-stub connection component." Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58, pp. 1015-1031 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00098-0
  11. Thornton, W. A. (1985). "Prying action: A general treatment." Engineering Journal, AISC, 22, pp. 67-75.

Cited by

  1. The contact stress distribution in the receding contact of an elastic layer with a rigid base vol.238, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111384