Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on Public Architecture Design Advisory and Management Organizations - A Case Study on England, France, United States, and Finland -

국외 공공건축 조성 및 관리 전문조직 사례 비교연구

  • 조시은 (국토연구원 부설 건축도시공간연구소) ;
  • 서수정 (국토연구원 부설 건축도시공간연구소) ;
  • 김영현 (국토연구원 부설 건축도시공간연구소)
  • Published : 2013.01.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The National Architectural Policy Plan 2007 has had a significant influence on the discussion of improving design and management processes of public architecture in Korea. Subsequently studies have highlighted the underlying inefficiencies of the design and management system attributing its problems to the lack of design expertise, bureaucratic design management process and inconsistent delivery of projects etc. Hence the need for a central body which supervises the overall design process and management of public facilities was established. This study investigates four design advisory and management organizations - CABE England, MIQCP France, the Public Buildings Service US, and the Senate Properties Finland - in terms of their main objectives, function, programs and organizational structure. Through this comparative study the article aims to identify common approaches to improving the design and management processes amongst these disparate systems, and provide a basis for formulating a general direction appropriate in the Korean administrative context.

Keywords

References

  1. Punter, J., Developing Urban Design as Public Policy: Best Practice Principles for Design Review and Development Management, Journal of Urban Design, 2007
  2. Punter, J., From Design Advice to Peer Review: The Role of the Urban Design Panel in Vancouver, Journal of Urban Design, 2010
  3. Nelissen, N., Preliminary conclusions: ten megatrends in aesthetic control in Europe, Urban Design International, 1999
  4. Scheer, B.C., Introduction, in: B. C. Scheer & W. F. E. Preiser Design Review: Challenging Urban Aesthetic Control, Chapman and Hall, 1994
  5. Julier, G. & Moor, L., Design and Creativity Policy, Management and Practice, Berg, 2009
  6. 박인석, 강인호, 박철수, 박광재, 공공 도시 건축 과정에서 민간전문가 참여방안 연구, 대한건축학회, 2007
  7. 이상민, 김진욱, 이민우, 공공건축물의 효율적 조성을 위한 운영방안 연구, 건축도시공간연구소, 2009
  8. 김진욱, 박태성, 이민우, 이진민, 공공건축 설계관리체계 구축을 위한 디자인행정 지원 방안, 건축도시공간연구소, 2009
  9. Sir John Egan, Rethinking construction: The report of the construction task force, DETR, 1998
  10. CABE, Client Guide for Arts Capital Programme Projects, 2002
  11. CABE, Design Review, 2006
  12. CABE, Creating excellent buildings: A guide for clients, 2010
  13. BIS, The Design council : A Review by Martin Temple CBE, 2010
  14. MIQCP, Les marches public de matrise d'oeuvre, 2008
  15. MIQCP, Rehabilitation des batiments publics dans le cadre de la loi MOP, 2010
  16. MIQCP The Attribution of Public Contracts to Project Consultants in Europe, 2002
  17. GSA, Project Planning Guide, 2003
  18. GSA, Design Excellence Policies and Procedures, 2000