Journal of Bio-Environment Control (생물환경조절학회지)

The Korean Society for Bio-Environment Control (한국생물환경조절학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Soil Water Potential on the Fruit Quality and Yield in Fertigation Cultivation of Paprika in Summer

여름철 파프리카 관비재배시 토양수분포텐셜이 과실품질 및 수량에 미치는 영향

  • 이한철 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 최경이 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 정재완 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 조명환 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 여경환 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 김다미 (국립원예특작과학원 시설원예시험장) ;
  • 안철근 (경상남도농업기술원) ;
  • 이동열 (광주광역시농업기술센터)
  • Received : 2013.09.11
  • Accepted : 2013.11.04
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify the effect of soil water potential on the fruit quality and yield of paprika in summer fertigation cultivation. Treatments of soil water potential during cultivation were composed of -10, -20, and -30 kPa, respectively. The plant height of early growth was increased by high soil water potential (-10 kPa) treatment all of 'Cupra' and 'E499524' (mini-paprika) varieties. Mean fruit weight was increased by -20 kPa soil water potential treatment compared with the other treatments. The fruit number per plant was not affected by soil water potential in 'Cupra' variety but was increased by -20 kPa soil water potential treatment in E499524 variety (mini-paprika). The yield of soil water potential treatment of -20 kPa was higher than those of the other treatments. The flesh thickness and sugar content were not affected by soil water potential in 'Cupra' and 'E499524' (mini-paprika) varieties. The incidence of fruit cracking was decreased with decreasing soil water potential. Mineral contents of plants such as nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium etc. were not affected in soil water potential.

파프리카의 토양재배면적 증가에 따라 관비재배법의 확립이 요구되고 있다. 관비재배(Fertigation)는 물과 양분을 함께 공급하는 방법으로 작물의 수분과 양분의 과부족에 의한 장해없이 근권을 안정적으로 유지할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 시설 파프리카의 관비재배시 토양수 분포텐셜에 따른 과실 품질 및 수량의 효과를 구명코자 실험을 수행하였다. '쿠프라' 및 'E499524' 2품종을 공시하여 정식 후부터 수확기까지 토양수분포텐셜을 -10, -20 그리고 -30kPa로 처리구를 두었다. 초장은 토양수분포텐셜이 높은 -10kPa 처리구가 가장 길었다. 과실의 평균 과중은 '쿠프라' 품종에서는 평균과중은 -20kPa에서 154.5kg으로 가장 무거웠으며 토양수분포텐셜이 낮은 -30kPa에서는 138.2kg으로 가벼웠다. 주당 착과수는 5.1~5.3개로 '쿠프라' 품종은 토양수분포텐셜에 따른 차이가 없었으나 'E499524' 품종은 -20kPa 처리구에서 10.3개로 가장 많았다. 상품수량은 '쿠프라' 품종은 -20kPa 처리구에서 2,321kg/10a로 가장 많았고 그리고 'E499524' 품종은 -20kPa 처리구에서 1,147kg/10a로 가장 많았다. '쿠프라' 품종에서는 과장과 과폭은 토양수분포텐셜에 따른 차이가 없었으나 'E499524' 품종은 토양수분포텐셜이 낮을수록 작은 경향을 보였다. 과실의 당도는 '쿠프라' 품종에서는 4.4~4.9oBrix, 그리고 'E499524' 품종에서는 7.6~8.3oBrix로 토양수분포텐셜에 따른 통계적 유의차가 없었다. 자방수는 '쿠프라' 품종에서는 3.3~3.6개, 그리고 'E499524' 품종에서는 2.5~2.7개로 토양수분포텐셜 간에 유의차이가 없었다. 과실의 열과 발생율은 '쿠프라' 및 'E499524' 품종 모두 토양수분포텐셜 낮을수록 적은 경향을 보였다. 식물체 내 질소의 함량은 토양수분포텐셜에 따른 차이가 없었으며 '쿠프라' 품종은 2.10~2.22%였고 'E499524' 품종은 1.72~1.82%였다. '쿠프라' 및 'E499524' 품종 모두 토양수분포텐셜에 따른 식물체의 칼륨, 칼슘, 마그네슘 등 무기 양분의 함량은 유의차이가 없었다. 이상의 결과에서 파프리카의 여름철 관비재배시 토양수분포텐셜을 -20kPa로 설정하는 것이 생육이 가장 좋은 것으로 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aloni, B., L. Karni, Z. Zaidman, and A.A. Schaffer. 1996. Changes of carbohydrates in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) flowers in relation to their abscisson under different shading regimes. Ann. Bot. 78:163-168. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1996.0109
  2. Aljibury, F.K. and D. May. 1970. Irrigation schedules and production of processing tomatoes on the Sun Joaquin Valley Westside. Calif. Agr. 24(8):10-11.
  3. An, C.G., Y.H. Hwang, H.S. Yoon, H.J. Hwang, C.W. Rho, G.W. Gong, and B.R. Jeong. 2005. Effect of first irrigation time after sunrise on fruit quality and yield of sweet peppers (Capsicu annuum 'Jubilee'and 'Romeca') in rock-wool culture. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. & Technol. 23:146-152.
  4. An, C.G., Y.H. Hwang, G.M. Shon, C.S. Lim, J.L. Cho, and B.R. Jeong. 2009. Effect of irrigation amount in rockwool and cocopeat substrates on growth and fruiting of sweet pepper during fruiting period. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. & Technol. 27:233-238.
  5. Bernstein, L. and L.E. Francois. 1973. Comparison of drip, furrow and sprinkler irrigation. Soil Sci. 115:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197301000-00010
  6. Buck, D.A., L.J. Erie, O.F. French, F.S. Nakayama, and W.D. Pew. 1981. Subsurface trickle irrigation management with multiple cropping. Trans ASAE 24:1482-1489. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34478
  7. Cho, I.H., W.M. Lee, K.B. Kwan, Y.H. Woo, and K.H. Lee. 2009. Stable production technique of Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.). by hydrogen peroxide treatment at summer. J. Bio-Env. Con. 18:297-301.
  8. Dorji, J. and M.H. Behboudian. 2003. Water relations, growth, yield, and fruit quality of hot pepper grown under controlled alternate drip irrigation on partial roots. Sci. Hort. 89:257-267.
  9. Freeman, B.M., L. Blackwell, and K.V. Garzoli. 1976. Irrigation frequency and total water application with trickle and furrow systems. Agric. Water Manage 1:21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(76)90004-4
  10. Hayata, Y., T. Tabe, S. Kondo, and K. Inoue. 1998. The effects of water stress on the growth, sugar and nitrogen content of cherry tomato fruit. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 65:759-766.
  11. Li, X.R., H.N. Cao, K.C. Yoo, and I.L. Kim. 2001. Effect of limited supplying frequency and amount of nutrient solutions on the yield and fruit quality of tomato grown in ash ball. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 42:501-505.
  12. Locascio, S.J., J.M. Myers, and F.G. Martin. 1977. Frequency and role of fertilization with trickle irrigation for strawberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 102:456-458.
  13. Martin, P.E., J.C. Lingle, R.M. Hagan, and W.J. Flocker. 1970. Irrigation of tomatoes in a single harvest program. Calif. Agr. 6:13-14.
  14. Park, D.K., J.K Kwon, J.H. Lee, Y,C. Um, H.T. Kim, and Y.H. Choi. 1998. The effect of soil water content during at fruit ripening stage on yield and quality in musk melon. J. Bio. Fac. Env. 7:330-335.
  15. Rhee, H.C., T.C. Seo, G.L. Choi, M.Y. Roh, and M.H. Cho. 2010. Effect of air humidity and water content of medium on the growth and physiological disorder of paprika in summer hydroponics. J. Bio-Env. Con. 19:305-310.
  16. Rhee, H.C., T.C. Seo, G.L. Choi, M.Y. Roh, M.H. Cho, and Y.C. Kim. 2011. Effect of water content in substrates on the growth and yield of mini-paprika in summer hydroponics. J. Bio-Env. Con. 20:258-262.
  17. Sammis, T.W. 1980. Comparison of sprinkle, trinkle, subsurface and furrow irrigation methods for row crops. Agron. J. 72:701-704. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1980.00021962007200050002x
  18. Saure, M.C. 2000. Blossom end rot of tomato - a calcium - or a stress-related disorder. Sci. Hort. 90:193-208.
  19. Shalhevet, J., D. Shimshi, and T. Meir. 1983. Potato irrigation requirements in a hot climate using sprinkler and drip methods. Agron. J. 75:13-16. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500010004x
  20. Won, J.H., B.C. Jeong, J.K. Kim, and S.J. Jeon. 2009. Selection of suitable cultivars for the hydropoincs of sweet pep per (Capsicum annuum L.) in the alpine area in summer. J. Bio-Env. Con. 18:425-430.
  21. Yu, G., D.G. Choi, J.H. Bae, and S. Guak. 2006a. Effects of substrate EC and water control on the incidence of brown fruit stem and blossom end rot in glasshouse sweet pepper. J. Bio-Env. Con. 15:167-172.
  22. Yu, G., J. Kim, and S. Guak. 2006b. Effect of cultivation time on the incidence of brown fruit stem of glasshouse sweet pepper (Capsiccum annuum L.). J. Bio-Env. Con. 15:162-166.