Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of dentists' subjective satisfaction with a newly developed device for maxillary sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Seok (Apsun Dental Hospital) ;
  • Yun, Pil-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • Received : 2013.08.20
  • Accepted : 2013.11.28
  • Published : 2013.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of this study were to assess the dentists' subjective satisfaction with the crestal approach sinus (CAS) kit, a device for maxillary sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach using a special drilling system and hydraulic pressure, and to summarize the subjective satisfaction of dental implants placed after a sinus lift procedure with the CAS kit. Methods: Thirty dental clinicians who had experience with dental implant placement after a sinus lift procedure with the CAS kit from June 2010 to May 2012 were included in this study. The questionnaire for the evaluation of the dentists' subjective satisfaction with the CAS kit was sent to the respondents and returned. The questionnaire was composed of two main parts. The first part was related to the sinus membrane perforation rate. The second part was related to the dentists' subjective satisfaction with the CAS kit. Results: A total of 28 dentists answered the questionnaire. Among 924 implant cases, sinus membrane perforation occurred in 38 cases (4.1%). Among the 28 dentists, 26 dentists (92.9%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the CAS kit. In particular, 24 dentists (85.7%) reported that safety, cutting performance, and user-friendliness of the CAS drill were advantages of the CAS kit. However, 7 dentists (25%) did not routinely use the hydraulic lifter for sinus membrane elevation. Conclusions: From the survey, it was shown that the respondents were generally satisfied with the CAS kit and that the cutting performance and safety of the drill component were considered strengths of the CAS kit.

Keywords

References

  1. Penarrocha-Diago M, Rambla-Ferrer J, Perez V, Perez-Garrigues H. Benign paroxysmal vertigo secondary to placement of maxillary implants using the alveolar expansion technique with osteotomes: a study of 4 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:129-32.
  2. Saker M, Ogle O. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo subsequent to sinus lift via closed technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:1385-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.296
  3. Cho SW, Kim SJ, Lee DK, Kim CS. The comparative evaluation using Hatch Reamer technique and osteotome technique in sinus floor elevation. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;32:154-61.
  4. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Hage G, Lazzara R. The modified osteotome technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:599-607.
  5. Lalo J, Broukris G, Djemil M, Beleh M. Safe technique for sinus floor elevation through alveolar crest with stop sinus osteotomes. Implantodontie 2005;14:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.implan.2005.05.006
  6. Draenert GF, Eisenmenger W. A new technique for the transcrestal sinus floor elevation and alveolar ridge augmentation with press-fit bone cylinders: a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35:201-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.02.005
  7. Tilotta F, Lazaroo B, Gaudy JF. Gradual and safe technique for sinus floor elevation using trephines and osteotomes with stops: a cadaveric anatomic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:210-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.12.030
  8. Kfir E, Kfir V, Mijiritsky E, Rafaeloff R, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation followed by maxillary bone augmentation and implant fixation. J Oral Implantol 2006;32:26-33. https://doi.org/10.1563/782.1
  9. Chen L, Cha J. An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique. J Periodontol 2005;76:482-91. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.482
  10. Kao DW, DeHaven HA Jr. Controlled hydrostatic sinus elevation: a novel method of elevating the sinus membrane. Implant Dent 2011;20:425-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182365307
  11. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-6.
  12. Strietzel FP, Nowak M, Kuchler I, Friedmann A. Peri-implant alveolar bone loss with respect to bone quality after use of the osteotome technique: results of a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:508-13. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130510.x
  13. Kolhatkar S, Cabanilla L, Bhola M. Inadequate vertical bone dimension managed by bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE): a literature review and case report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:81-8.
  14. Leblebicioglu B, Ersanli S, Karabuda C, Tosun T, Gokdeniz H. Radiographic evaluation of dental implants placed using an osteotome technique. J Periodontol 2005;76:385-90. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.3.385
  15. Fugazzotto PA, De PS. Sinus floor augmentation at the time of maxillary molar extraction: success and failure rates of 137 implants in function for up to 3 years. J Periodontol 2002;73:39-44. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.39
  16. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):241-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x
  17. Tetsch J, Tetsch P, Lysek DA. Long-term results after lateral and osteotome technique sinus floor elevation: a retrospective analysis of 2190 implants over a time period of 15 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:497-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01661.x
  18. Nkenke E, Schlegel A, Schultze-Mosgau S, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:557-66.
  19. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45.
  20. Soltan M, Smiler DG. Antral membrane balloon elevation. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:85-90. https://doi.org/10.1563/0-773.1
  21. Hu X, Lin Y, Metzmacher AR, Zhang Y. Sinus membrane lift using a water balloon followed by bone grafting and implant placement: a 28-case report. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:243-7.
  22. Sotirakis EG, Gonshor A. Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor with hydraulic pressure. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:197-204. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[197:EOTMSF]2.0.CO;2
  23. Sohn DS, Lee JS, An KM, Choi BJ. Piezoelectric internal sinus elevation (PISE) technique: a new method for internal sinus elevation. Implant Dent 2009;18:458-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b8e17f
  24. Bensaha T. Evaluation of the capability of a new water lift system to reduce the risk of Schneiderian membrane perforation during sinus elevation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;40:815-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.04.005
  25. Pommer B, Watzek G. Gel-pressure technique for flapless transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation: a preliminary cadaveric study of a new surgical technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:817-22.
  26. Kang IJ, Lee TK. Evaluation of early success rates in sinus lift procedures utilizing the Hatch Reamer system. J Dent Implant Res 2007;26:33-43.
  27. Lee JY, Kim YK. Sinus bone graft using minimal invasive crestal approach and simultaneous implant placement: preliminary report. Implantology 2008;12:4-16.

Cited by

  1. Long-term results of new deproteinized bovine bone material in a maxillary sinus graft procedure vol.44, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2014.44.5.259
  2. Sinus Grafts: Science and Techniques-Then and Now vol.16, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-017-1007-x
  3. Minimal Invasive Sinus Membrane Elevation Using Crestal Approach: Case Reports and Literature Review vol.21, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12972/implant.20170011
  4. Alveolar Crestal Approach for Maxillary Sinus Membrane Elevation with <4 mm of Residual Bone Height: A Case Report vol.2018, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1063459
  5. Minimally Invasive Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Procedure in Severely Atrophic Ridge: A Case Report vol.47, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-19-00166