DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Life Cycle Assessment and Eco-efficiency Analysis for the Resource-circulation Network of Waste Heat Generated from Industrial Process

공정폐열의 자원순환 네트워크 구성을 위한 전과정 평가 및 생태효율성 분석

  • Shin, Choon-Hwan (Department of Energy & Environmental Engineering, Dongseo University) ;
  • Park, Do-Hyun (Busan Fashion Color Industry Cooperation, Energy Environment Center) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Won (Environmental Technology and Industry of Pusan National University)
  • 신춘환 (동서대학교 에너지환경공학과) ;
  • 박도현 (부산패션칼라산업협동조합 에너지.환경연구소) ;
  • 김지원 (부산대학교 환경기술산업개발연구소)
  • Received : 2012.09.03
  • Accepted : 2012.11.12
  • Published : 2013.03.29

Abstract

For the purpose of evaluating the eco-efficiency(EE) on surplus heat generated from industrial process, techniques of life cycle assessment are adopted in this study. Because it can be indicated both environmental impacts and economic benefits, EE is well known as a useful tool for symbiosis network on the sustainable development of new projects and businesses. To evaluate environmental impacts, the categories were divided into two areas of resource depletion and global warming potential. It can be seen that environmental impact increased a little but much higher economic benefit on the company, environmental performance and economic value were improved on the apartment by the district heating, respectively. In result, eco-industrial park(EIP) project on surplus heat should be found sustainable new business because the EE was in the area of fully positively eco-efficiency and, moreover resource depletion was taken place than the reduction of greenhouse gas.

Keywords

References

  1. Anite Systems, 1999, A first set of eco-efficiency indicators for industry: pilot study, Luxembourg, 21-22.
  2. Busan Fashion Color Cooperative, 2011, Plan of environmental improvement for green company appointment.
  3. Charmondusit, K. and Keartpakpraek, K., 2008, Ecoefficiency evaluation of the petroleum and petrochemical group in the Map Ta Phut industrial estate, paper presented in The International Conference on Environmental Research and Technology, (ICERT08), 28-30, Penang, Malaysia.
  4. Chung, T. H., Ahn, J. W., Chung, J. C., 1995, Basic principle of LCA, KEF.
  5. Committee of Green Growth, 2009, Five-year plane for national strategy of green growth.
  6. Cote, R.P. and Cohen-Rosenthal, E., 1998, Designing eco-industrial parks : A synthensis of some experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production 6(3/4), 181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00029-8
  7. Energy Management Corporation, 2007, Renewable energy RD&D 2030.
  8. Hanegraaf, M.C., E.E. Biewinga, and G. van der Bul. 1998, Assessing the ecological and economic sustainability of energy crops. Biomass and Bioenergy. 15:345-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00042-7
  9. Helminen, R.-R., 2000, Developing tangible measures for eco-efficiency: the case of the Finnish and Swedish pulp and paper industry. Business Strategy and the Environment 9(3), 196e210.
  10. IPCC, 2006, Guide Line for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
  11. ISO(International Organization for Standardization), 2006, ISO 14040:2006(E) Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework.
  12. Kharel, G.P. and Charmondusit, K., 2008, Ecoefficiency evaluation of iron rod industry in Nepal, J. of Cleaner Production, 16(13), 1379-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.07.004
  13. Kim J. I., Yoon, C. H., Yoon H. S., 2010, Eco-efficiency index development of yeosu industrial park, J. Clean Tech, 16(3). 229-237.
  14. Kim, S. K., Yoon, Y. J., Choi, J. H., Kim, I., Chung, T. H., 2008, Eco-efficiency and application of sewage treatment plant, K. Soc. Water & Wastwater, K. Soc. Water Environment, Conference, 206-207.
  15. Kitikorn Charmondusit, 2009, Development of Eco-Efficiency Indicators for Assessement of Industrial Estate, International Conference on Green and Sustainable Innovation 2009, Chiang Rai
  16. Lowe, E., 2001, Eco-industrial Park Handbook for Asian Developing Countries. Report to Asian Development Bank.
  17. National Energy Committee, 2008, The first master plane for energy.
  18. Park, H. S., Eldon R. Rene, Choi, S. M., Anthony S.F. Chiu., 2008, Strategies for sustainable development of industrial park in Ulsan, South Korea-From spontaneous evolution to systematic expansion of industrial symbiosis. Journal of Environmental Management 87, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.045
  19. Prime Mister's Office, 2008, All-out program of climate change-correspondence.
  20. Prime Mister's Office, 2008, Rationalized principal program for energy use.
  21. Sanna Erkko, Matti Melanen, Per Mickwitz, 2005, Eco-efficiency in the Finnish EMAS reports - a buzz word-, Journal of Cleaner Production 13, 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.12.027
  22. Schaltegger, S., Sturm, A., 1992, Okologieorientierte Entscheidungen in Unternehmen: okologisches Rechnungswesen statt Okobilanzierung; Notwendigkeit, Kriterien, Konzepte. Haupt, Bern.
  23. Shin, C. H., Kim, J. W., 2012, Eco-efficiency of energy symbiosis for the energy network of surplus heat, J. Kor. Environ. Sci., 21(5), 545-553. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2012.21.5.545
  24. Thant, M. M. and Charmondusit, K., 2009, Ecoefficiency assessment of pulp and paper industry in Myanmar, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 15,179-187.