DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of three-dimensional collision probability according to approaching objects to the KOMPSAT series

아리랑 위성들의 경향에 따른 및 3차원 충돌확률 분석

  • Seong, Jae-Dong (Department of Satellite Systems and Application, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Dong (Korea Aerospace Research Institute, University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lim, Seong-Min (Department of Satellite Systems and Application, University of Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2012.10.05
  • Accepted : 2013.01.22
  • Published : 2013.02.01

Abstract

Collision probability is the most common method to measure the risk of space debris, it is widely used that two dimensional linear collision probability using the closest approach distance. This paper represents the characteristics of object that approach KOMPSAT 2, 3, 5 that have operated or will be operated by Korea. And more precise method than two dimensional linear collision probability, we analyzed the properties of three dimensional nonlinear collision probability using STK/Nonlinear Collision Probability Tool. Through this, efficiency of three dimensional nonlinear collision probability for KOMPSAT series satellites was investigated. The result represents that three dimensional nonlinear collision probability showed the precise outcome at a relative velocity of less than 350m/s. Also, KOMPSAT series satellites appeared to few low relative velocity approaches and showed low efficiency for the three dimensional nonlinear collision probability.

우주파편과의 위험성을 판단하는데 가장 보편적으로 사용되는 것이 충돌확률이며, 현재 널리 사용되고 있는 방법은 최근접거리를 이용한 2차원 선형 충돌확률 계산방법이다. 본 논문에서는 우리나라가 운용하거나 운용을 계획 중인 아리랑 2호, 3호, 5호 위성에 접근하는 물체의 접근 특성을 분석하고, 2차원 선형 충돌확률보다 더 정밀한 3차원 비선형 충돌확률의 특성을 STK/Nonlinear Collision Probability Tool을 이용하여 분석하였다. 이를 통해 저궤도 위성인 아리랑 위성들에 대해 3차원 비선형 충돌확률의 효용성에 대해 고찰하였다. 분석결과 3차원 비선형 충돌확률은 350m/s 이하의 상대속도 영역에서 효용성이 있음을 확인하였으며, 우리나라 위성의 경우 낮은 상대속도를 가지고 접근하는 경우가 거의 없는 것으로 나타나 실질적으로 3차원 비선형 충돌확률에 대한 효용성이 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alfano. S., "Review of Conjunction Probability Methods for Short-term Encounters," AAS Paper No. 07-148, AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, Sedona, Arizona, 2007.
  2. McKinley. D. P, "Development of a Nonlinear Probability of Collision Tool for the Earth Observing System",AIAA/AAS Astrodynamic Specialist Conference, Monterey, CA, 2002.
  3. Alfano. S, "Addressing Nonlinear Relative Motion For Spacecraft Collision Probability," AIAA Paper No. 2006-6760, 15th AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Keystone, Colorado, 2006.
  4. Seong. J. D, Lee. D. W, Cho. K. R, Kim. H. D and Kim. H. J, "Analysis of the Collision Probability and Mission Environment for GEO", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol.39(7), pp.674-681, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2011.39.7.674
  5. Jung. I. S, Choi. S. J, Chung. D. W, "Statistical Conjunction Analysis between KOMPSAT-2 and Space Debris" , Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol.40(1), pp.78-85, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2012.40.1.78
  6. Kim. E. H, Kim. H. D, Kim. E. K, Kim. H. J, "Analysis of Collision Avoidance Maneuver Frequency for the KOMPSAT-2 and the KOMPSAT-5", Journal of The Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, vol.39(11), pp.1033-1041, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2011.39.11.1033
  7. Alfriend. K. T., Akeela. M. R., Lee. D., Frisbee. J., Foster. J. L, "Probability of Collision Error Analysis ", Kluwer Academic Publichers, Vo1. 1, No. 1, pp. 21-35, 1999.
  8. www.celestrak.com