Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on the Factors Affecting the Citation in Korean Material Science Articles

한국 재료공학 논문의 피인용 영향요인에 관한 연구

  • 신은자 (세종대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Received : 2013.02.18
  • Accepted : 2013.03.17
  • Published : 2013.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study pointed the factors affecting the number of articles and citations in material science which is the most active publishing disciplinary in South Korea. This was conducted by gathering the information on SCIE which had been published by 449 Korean professors in material science from 2006 to 2010. One of the results was that the professors who had published more papers received more citations than those who did not, reconfirming former studies abroad. It was observed that the factors majors impacting on the number of papers may be their academic positions, educational backgrounds (particularly undergraduates), and places of work. The number of citations was affected by the authors' undergraduate and their locations of the work. This study suggested a need for more supports on basic researches by universities and funding bodies and an amendment of performance measures to include the number of citations.

이 연구는 한국에서 SCIE 논문을 가장 활발하게 발표하고 있는 분야인 재료공학과 대학교수 449명이 2006년부터 2010년까지 발표한 SCIE 논문수와 피인용 횟수를 측정하고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 구체적으로 규명하고자 하였다. 연구 결과 논문수가 많은 교수가 피인용 횟수도 높은 것으로 나타나 외국의 선행연구 결과와 유사하였고, 논문수에 영향을 주는 요인은 교수의 직급, 출신학부, 재직 대학의 소재지일 수 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 피인용에 영향을 주는 요인으로 인적 특성 가운데 출신학부가 있었고, 환경적 특성으로 재직 대학의 소재지가 서울인지 지방인지에 따라 피인용 횟수에 뚜렷한 차이가 있음을 확인하였다. 장기적으로 국내 SCIE 논문의 피인용을 증진하기 위해서는 피인용을 촉발할 수 있는 기초 연구에 보다 많은 지원을 해야 하고, 대학과 연구비 지원기관의 연구성과 평가에 피인용 횟수도 포함시키는 등 평가방식도 보완할 필요성이 제기되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2010). SCI 과학기술논문 발표 현황. Retrieved from http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/ (Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2010). Reports on publication of SCI articles. Retrieved from http://cesi.kedi.re.kr/)
  2. 권기석, 한동성, 한승환 (2009). 한국 이공계 대학교수의 특성과 산학협력의 방식. 한국행정학회 동계학술발표논문집, 1298-1314. (Kwon, Ki-Seok, Han, Dong-Seong, & Han, Seung-Hwan (2009). The characteristics of Korean Professors in science and technology and cooperation between industry and educational organizations. Proceedings of the Korean Association for Public Administration, 1298-1314.)
  3. 김완종, 노경란, 박민수, 최현규 (2011). 2010년도 한국 과학자의 SCI 논문 계량분석. KISTI 지식리포트, 16호. 서울: 한국과학기술정보연구원. Retrieved from http://icon.ndsl.kr/i_report/icon_knowledgeReportView.jsp?record_no=416 (Kim, Wan Jong, Noh, Kyung-Ran, Park, Min Soo, & Choi, Hyunkyoo (2011). An bibliometric analysis on SCI articles published in 2010 by Korean scientists. KISTI Knowledge Reports, 16. Seoul: Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information. Retrieved from http://icon.ndsl.kr/i_report/icon_knowledgeReportView.jsp?record_no=416)
  4. 남영준, 서현정, 김규환 (2011). 우리나라 토목공학분야 연구자의 인용행태에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 28(4), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.201 (Nam, Young-Joon, Seo, Hyun-Jung, & Kim, Gyu-Hwan (2011). Citing behaviors of researchers in Korea civil engineering. Journal of the Korean Sociey for Information Management, 28(4), 201-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.201)
  5. 박현우, 유선희 (2010). 주요국의 학문분야별 과학연구의 영향력 분석. 한국콘텐츠학회논문지. 10(3), 392-403. (Park, Hyun-Woo, & Yoo, Sun-Hi (2010). International impact of scientific research of major countries. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(3), 392-403.) https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.3.392
  6. 유재복, 정영미 (2010). 특허 인용에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 103-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.103 (Yoo, Jae-Bok, & Chung, Young-Mee (2010). Analysis of factors influencing patent citations. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 103-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.1.103)
  7. 이남영, 이상은, 이춘실 (2009). 초록, 인용색인 그리고 E-Journal 데이터베이스의 한국 의학학술지 피인용도 차이 분석. 제16회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 121-126. (Lee, Nam Young, Yi, Sang Eun, & Lee, Choon Shil (2009). An analysis of different citation rates of Korean medical journals by abstract, citation index and e-journal databases. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Korean Society for Information Management, 121-126.)
  8. 임연기 (1998). 대학 연구활동의 측정.평가에 관한 연구. 교육행정학연구, 16(2), 358-384. (Im, Youn-Kee (1998). A study on measurements and evaluations for research in universities. The Journal of Education Administration, 16(2), 358-384.)
  9. 정연경 (2011). 국내 기록관리학 연구자들의 인용행태 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 45(2), 367-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.367 (Chung, Yeon-Kyoung (2011). A reference study on archives and records management in the Journal of the Korean Society of Archives and Records Management during the period of 2001-2010. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 45(2), 357-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.367)
  10. 정희경, 이춘실 (2009). 국내 의학 학술지의 일정 주기별 SCI 피인용 최상위 논문 선정 방법. 제16회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 127-132. (Chung, Hee Kyung, & Lee, Choon Shil (2009). A methodology to generate the ranking of the most cited articles based on SCI citations. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Korean Society for Information Management, 127-132.)
  11. 한국연구재단 (2012). 2012년도 전국대학 대학연구활동실태조사 분석보고서. 서울: 한국연구재단. (National Research Foundation of Korea (2012). Annual reports about research outputs in nationwide universities for 2012. Seoul: Research Foundation of Korea.)
  12. 한국연구재단. 한국연구업적통합정보(Korean Researchers Information). Retrieved from http://www.kri.go.kr/kri/rp/main.jsp (National Research Foundation of Korea. Korean Researchers Information. Retrieved from http://www.kri.go.kr/kri/rp/main.jsp)
  13. Aksnes, D. W., Rorstad, K., Piro, F., & Sivertsen, G. (2011). Are female researchers less cited? A large-scale study of Norwegian scientists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(4), 628-636. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.21486
  14. Conkey, M., & Williams, S. (1991). Original narratives: The political economy of gender in archaeology. In M. Leonardo, (Ed.), Gender at the crossroads of knowledge (pp. 102-139). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  15. Davis, P. M. (2009). Author-choice open access publishing in the biological and medical literature: A citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.20965
  16. Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
  17. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47. Retrieved from http://sites.computer.org/debull/A05dec/hajjem.pdf
  18. Harnad, S., & Brody, T. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/june2004-harnad
  19. Hutson, S. R. (2006). Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-006-9001-5
  20. Journal Citation Reports. Retrieved from http://admin-apps.webofknowledge.com/JCR/JCR
  21. Krause, K. (2009). Increasing your article's citation rates. Retrieved from http://works,bepress.com/kate_krause/12
  22. Long, J. S. (1992). Measuring of sex differences in scientific productivity. Social Forces, 71(1), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/71.1.159
  23. Maharana, B., Majhi, S., & Sethi, B. B. (2011). Citation analysis of top research papers in chemistry with specific reference to India. Library Review, 60(6), 501-512. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111147215
  24. Quacquarelli Symonds (2012). QS World University Rankings - 2012. Retrieved from http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2012
  25. Tilley, C. (1989). Discourse and power: The genre of the Cambridge inaugural lecture. In D. Miller, M. Rowelands, & C. Tilley (Eds.), Domination and resistance (pp. 41-62). London: Routledge.
  26. Trifunac, M. D. (2006). A note on publication and citation rates of female academics in earchquake engineering. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 26(11), 1063-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.05.011
  27. Web of Science. Retrieved from http://apps.webofknowledge.com/