Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Lifecycle Cost Model for Electronic Records & Archival Management

공공 전자기록의 생애주기 기반 관리 비용 모형에 관한 연구

  • 현문수 (부산대학교 사회과학연구원)
  • Received : 2013.02.19
  • Accepted : 2013.03.11
  • Published : 2013.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to propose a lifecycle cost model for electronic records & archival management. For this purpose, the study identified cost elements based on analysing public records & archival management activities and proposed cost factors for management by applying data gathered from records centers & archives. The study employed various methods: desk research, activity analysis, a cost information survey and interviews with experts in digital preservation, and records/archival management. The study made the first step to the cost studies in electronic records management in Korea. It is expected to update the CoMMPER model and redefine activities of electronic records management. Further case studies based on the model is required.

본 연구의 목적은 기록관리기관이 공공 전자기록의 생애주기 전체에 걸친 관리 책무를 다하는데 소요될 비용을 예측해 산정하기 위한 모형을 개발하는 데에 있다. 이를 위해 공공 전자기록관리에 필요한 활동을 분석하고 이를 기반으로 비용 요소를 설계하였다. 연구 초기부터 전문가 면담을 진행하면서 연구의 과정과 결과를 검토하였으며, 특히 실무 전문가 면담을 통해 비용 모형의 적절성과 적용가능성을 검토하고자 하였다. 이러한 과정을 거치면서 설계한 비용 요소와 비용에 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상되는 요인 등을 종합하여 기록관리기관의 정책 결정에 활용할 수 있는 공공 전자기록 관리 비용 모형, CoMMPER 모형(안)을 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원 (2008). 영구기록물관리기관 표준운영절차. 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 9:2008(1.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2008). Standard operation procedure for archival institutions. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 9:2008(1.0)].)
  2. 국가기록원 (2009a). 기록관 표준운영절차: 일반(1.0). 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S10:2009(v1.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2009a). Standard operating procedures for records centers: General. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S10:2009(v1.0)].)
  3. 국가기록원 (2009b). 기록관리기준표 작성 및 관리 절차. 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 4:2009(v2.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2009b). Construction & management procedures of the records management reference table. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 4:2009(v2.0)].)
  4. 국가기록원 (2009c). 기록물 평가.폐기 절차- 제1부: 기록관용. 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 5-1:2009(v2.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2009c). Records appraisal & destruction procedures, Part 1: Records center. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 5-1:2009(v2.0)].)
  5. 국가기록원 (2009d). 처리과 기록관리 업무처리 절차. 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 3:2009(v2.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2009d). Records management procedures for the office. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 3:2009(v2.0)].)
  6. 국가기록원 (2010a). 기록물 공개관리 업무 - 제1부: 기록물 생산부서 및 기록관(v1.0). 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 19-1:2010(v1.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2010a). Disclosure of public records, Part 1: Records creators & records centers. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 19-1:2010(v1.0)].)
  7. 국가기록원 (2010b). 기록물 평가.폐기 절차 - 제2부: 영구기록물관리기관용(v1.0). 대전: 국가기록원. [NAK/S 5-2:2010(v1.0)]. (National Archives of Korea (2010b). Records appraisal & destruction procedures, Part 2: Archives. Daejeon: National Archives of Korea. [NAK/S 5-2:2010(v1.0)].)
  8. 안병우, 이상민, 심성보, 남경호, 김진성, 오동석, 정태영 (2012). 한국 공공기록관리의 쟁점과 전망: 2013년 기록관리체제를 위하여. 기록학연구, 34, 3-28. (Ahn, Byung-Woo, Lee, Sang-Min, Sim, Seong-Bo, Nam, Kyeong-Ho, Kim, Jin-Sung, O, Dong-Seok, & Jeong, Tae-Young (2012). 2013 records regime: Issues and prospects for public records management in Korea. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 34, 3-28.)
  9. 이경남, 이소연 (2008). 전자기록의 장기적 보존과 관리를 위한 아젠다 개발. 한국기록관리학회지, 8(1), 211-234. (Lee, Kyung-Nam, & Lee, So-Yeon (2008). Developing agenda for electronic records long-term preservation & management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives & Records Management, 8(1), 211-234.)
  10. 이소연 (2009). 전자기록 관리의 현황과 과제. 기록학연구, 21, 355-383. (Lee, So-Yeon (2009). Current state & future direction for electronic records management. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 21, 355-383.)
  11. 이윤주, 이소연 (2009). 진본 전자기록의 장기보존을 위한 정책프레임워크. 기록학연구, 19, 193-249. (Lee, Yoon-ju, & Lee, So-Yoen (2009). A policy framework for the long-term preservation of authentic digital records: Based on InterPARES studies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 19, 193-249.)
  12. 정혜경 (2005). 디지털 보존의 비용요소에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 22(1), 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.1.047 (Chung, Hye-Kyung (2005). A study on costs of digital preservation. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(1), 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.1.047)
  13. Ayris, P., Davies, R., McLeod, R., Miao, R., Shenton, H., & Wheatley, P. (2008). The LIFE2 final project report. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/11758/1/11758.pdf
  14. Beagrie, N., & Greenstein, D. (1998). A strategic policy framework for creating and preserving digital collection. Retrieved from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/supporting/pdf/framework.pdf
  15. Bradley, K. (2005). APSR sustainability issues discussion paper. Retrieved from http://www.apsr.edu.au/documents/APSR_Sustainability_Issues_Paper.pdf
  16. CCSDS (2002). Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). (CCSDS 650.0-B-1. Blue Book). Retrieved from http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf
  17. Chapman, S. (2004). Counting the costs of digital preservation: Is repository storage affordable? Journal of Digital Information, 4(2). Retrieved from http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/viewFile/100/99
  18. Crespo, A., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2001). Cost-driven design for archival repositories. JCDL '01 Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. Retrieved from http://infolab.stanford.edu/-crespo/publications/cost.pdf
  19. Hendley, T. (1998). Comparison of methods & costs of digital preservation. (British Library Research & Innovation Report 106). British Library Research & Innovation Centre. Retrieved from http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/services/elib/papers/tavistock/hendley/hendley.html
  20. Kejser, U. B., Nielsen, A. B., & Thirifays, A. (2009). The cost of digital preservation: Project report v.1.0. Retrieved from http://www.costmodelfordigitalpreservation.dk/contact/cmdp-1---preservation-planning-and-digital-migrations/documentation/Projectreport_CMDP_FINAL.pdf
  21. Kejser, U. B., Nielsen, A. B., & Thirifays, A. (2011). Cost of digital preservation: Project report for phase 2. Retrieved from http://www.costmodelfordigitalpreservation.dk/contact/cmdp- 2---ingest-and-archival-storage/documentation/CostsofDigitalPreservationPhase2%28Ingest%29.pdf
  22. Lavoie, B. F. (2003). The incentives to preserve digital materials: Roles, Scenarios & economic decision making. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/research/activities/past/orprojects/digipres/incentives-dp.pdf
  23. OCLC & CRL (2007). Trustworthy repositories audit & certification: Criteria and checklist. Retrieved from http://www.crl.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/pages/trac_0.pdf
  24. Sanett, S. (2002). Toward developing a framework of cost elements for preserving authentic electronic records into perpetuity. College & Research Libraries, 63(5), 388-404. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.63.5.388
  25. Sierman, B., & Wheatley, P. (2010). Evaluation of preservation planning within OAIS, based on the Planets functional model. Retrieved from http://www.planets-project.eu/docs/reports/Planets_PP7-D3-4_ReportOnThePlanetsFunctionalModel.pdf
  26. Watson, J. (2005, November). The LIFE project research review: Mapping the landsace, riding a lifecycle. London: LIFE Project. Retrieved from http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1856/

Cited by

  1. Trends Analysis of Digital Preservation Research in Korea vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.247
  2. Evaluation of the Preservation Functions in Standard Records Management System for Public Agencies vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.2.115