DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Male Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis of 18 Studies

  • Sun, Jing-Wen (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Li, Xiao-Rong (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Gao, Hong-Yu (Department of Nephrology, Tong Ji Hospital, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Yin, Jie-Yun (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Qin, Qin (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Nie, Shao-Fa (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Wei, Sheng (Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tong Ji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology)
  • Published : 2013.01.31

Abstract

Background: The possibility that electromagnetic fields (EMF) exposure may increase male breast cancer risk has been discussed for a long time. However, arguments have been presented that studies limited by poor quality could have led to statistically significant results by chance or bias. Moreover, data fo the last 10 years have not been systematically summarized. Methods and Results: To confirm any possible association, a meta-analysis was performed by a systematic search strategy. Totals of 7 case-control and 11 cohort studies was identified and pooled ORs with 95% CIs were used as the principal outcome measures. Data from these studies were extracted with a standard meta-analysis procedure and grouped in relation to study design, cut-off point, exposure assessment method, adjustment and exposure model. A statistical significant increased risk of male breast cancer with EMF exposure was defined (pooled ORs = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.14-1.52, P < 0.001), and subgroup analyses also showed similar results. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that EMF exposure may be associated with the increase risk of male breast cancer despite the arguments raised.

Keywords

References

  1. Atzmon I, Linn S, Richter E, Portnov B A (2012). Cancer risks in the Druze Isifya Village: Reasons and RF/MW antennas. Pathophysiology, 19, 21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2011.07.005
  2. Begg CB, Mazumdar M (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50, 1088-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
  3. Bellieni CV, Pinto I, Bogi A, et al (2012). Exposure to electromagnetic fields from laptop use of “laptop” computers. Arch Environ Occup Health, 67, 31-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2011.564232
  4. Chen C, Ma X, Zhong M, Yu Z (2010). Extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields exposure and female breast cancer risk: A meta-analysis based on 24,338 cases and 60,628 controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 123, 569-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-010-0782-6
  5. Christoffer J (2004). Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health, 30, 1-80 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.759
  6. Cocco P, Figgs L, Dosemeci M, et al (1998). Case-control study of occupational exposures and male breast cancer. Occup Environm Med, 55, 599-604. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.55.9.599
  7. Davis S, Kaune WT, Mirick DK, Chen C, Stevens RG (2001). Residential magnetic fields, light-at-night, and nocturnal urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin concentration in women. Am J Epidemiol, 154, 591-600. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/154.7.591
  8. Demers PA, Thomas DB, Rosenblatt KA, et al (1991). Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and breast cancer in men. Am J Epidemiol, 134, 340-7.
  9. Duval S, Tweedie R (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
  10. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M, Minder C (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315, 629-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  11. Erren TC (2001). A meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies of electric and magnetic fields and breast cancer in women and men. Bioelectromagnetics, 5, S105-19.
  12. Fear NT, Roman E, Carpenter LM, Newton R, Bull D (1996). Cancer in electrical workers: an analysis of cancer registrations in England, 1981-87. Br J Cancer, 73, 935-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.167
  13. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer, 127, 2893-917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25516
  14. Feychting M, Forssen U (2006). Electromagnetic fields and female breast cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 17, 553-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-005-9008-3
  15. Feychting M, Forssen U, Rutqvist LE, Ahlbom A (1998). Magnetic fields and breast cancer in Swedish adults residing near high-voltage power lines. Epidemiology, 9, 392-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199807000-00008
  16. Floderus B, Stenlund C, Persson T (1999). Occupational magnetic field exposure and site-specific cancer incidence: a Swedish cohort study. Cancer Causes Control, 10, 323-32. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008953920877
  17. Floderus B, Tornqvist S, Stenlund C (1994). Incidence of selected cancers in Swedish railway workers, 1961-79. Cancer Causes Control, 5, 189-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830265
  18. Forssen UM, Feychting M, Rutqvist LE, Floderus B, Ahlbom A (2000). Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and breast cancer in females. Epidemiology, 11, 24-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-200001000-00007
  19. Girgert R, Grundker C, Emons G, Hanf V (2008). Electromagnetic fields alter the expression of estrogen receptor cofactors in breast cancer cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 29, 169-76. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20387
  20. Girgert R, Hanf V, Emons G, Grundker C (2010). Signal transduction of the melatonin receptor MT1 is disrupted in breast cancer cells by electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 31, 237-45.
  21. Guenel P, Raskmark P, Andersen JB, Lynge E (1993). Incidence of cancer in persons with occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields in Denmark. Br J Ind Med, 50, 758-64.
  22. Guerrero JM, Reiter RJ (1992). A brief survey of pineal gland-immune system interrelationships. Endocr Res, 18, 91-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07435809209035401
  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327, 557-60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  24. Hill SM, Blask DE (1988). Effects of the pineal hormone melatonin on the proliferation and morphological characteristics of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) in culture. Cancer Res, 48, 6121-6.
  25. Johansen C, Olsen JH (1998). Risk of cancer among Danish utility workers--a nationwide cohort study. Am J Epidemiol, 147, 548-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009486
  26. Kluttig A, Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A (2009). Established and suspected risk factors in breast cancer aetiology. Breast Care, 4, 82-7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000211368
  27. Loomis DP (1992). Cancer of breast among men in electrical occupations. Lancet, 339, 1482-3.
  28. Matanoski GM, Breysse PN, Elliott EA (1991). Electromagnetic field exposure and male breast cancer. Lancet, 337, 737. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)90325-J
  29. Nichols L, Sorahan T (2005). Mortality of UK electricity generation and transmission workers, 1973-2002. Occup Med (Lond), 55, 541-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqi157
  30. Nordenson I, Mild KH, Jarventaus H, et al (2001). Chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes of train engine drivers. Bioelectromagnetics, 22, 306-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.55
  31. Park SK, Ha M, Im HJ (2004). Ecological study on residences in the vicinity of AM radio broadcasting towers and cancer death: Preliminary observations in Korea. International Arch Occup Environm Health, 77, 387-94.
  32. Pessina GP, Aldinucci C, Palmi M, et al (2001). Pulsed electromagnetic fields affect the intracellular calcium concentrations in human astrocytoma cells. Bioelectromagnetics, 22, 503-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.79
  33. Pollan M, Gustavsson P, Floderus B (2001). Breast cancer, occupation, and exposure to electromagnetic fields among Swedish men. Am J Ind Med, 39, 276-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0274(200103)39:3<276::AID-AJIM1015>3.0.CO;2-B
  34. Reiter RJ, Melchiorri D, Sewerynek E, et al (1995). A review of the evidence supporting melatonin's role as an antioxidant. J Pineal Res, 18, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-079X.1995.tb00133.x
  35. Repacholi M (2012). Concern that “EMF” magnetic fields from power lines cause cancer. Sci Total Environ, 426, 454-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.030
  36. Rosenbaum PF, Vena JE, Zielezny MA, Michalek AM (1994). Occupational exposures associated with male breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol, 139, 30-6.
  37. Savitz DA, Loomis DP (1995). Magnetic Field Exposure in Relation to Leukemia and Brain Cancer Mortality among Electric Utility Workers. Am J Epidemiol, 141, 123-34.
  38. Stenlund C, Floderus B (1997). Occupational exposure to magnetic fields in relation to male breast cancer and testicular cancer: a Swedish case-control study. Cancer Causes Control, 8, 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018468112964
  39. Stevens RG (1987). Electric power use and breast cancer: a hypothesis. Am J Epidemiol, 125, 556-61.
  40. Theriault G, Goldberg M, Miller AB, et al (1994). Cancer Risks Associated with Occupational Exposure to Magnetic Fields among Electric Utility Workers in Ontario and Quebec, Canada, and France: 1970-1989. Am J Epidemiol, 139, 550-72.
  41. Travis RC, Allen DS, Fentiman IS, Key TJ (2004). Melatonin and breast cancer: a prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, 475-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh077
  42. Tynes T, Andersen A, Langmark F (1992). Incidence of cancer in Norwegian workers potentially exposed to electromagnetic fields. Am J Epidemiol, 136, 81-8.
  43. Wells G BLOD (2003). An Evaluation of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale: An Assessment Tool for Evaluating the Quality of Non-Randomized Studies. XI Cochrane Colloquium, p 63.
  44. Wertheimer N, Leeper E (1979). Electrical wiring configurations and childhood cancer. Am J Epidemiol, 109, 273-84.
  45. Zhang X, Liu X, Pan L, Lee I (2010). Magnetic fields at extremely low-frequency (50 Hz, 0.8 mT) can induce the uptake of intracellular calcium levels in osteoblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 396, 662-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.04.154

Cited by

  1. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk in a Chinese Population vol.14, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2433
  2. Males at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Who Are They and How Should We Screen Them? vol.05, pp.07, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ss.2014.57054
  3. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Punjabi population from North West India vol.35, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2404-0
  4. Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphism (-634G/C) and breast cancer risk vol.35, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-1997-7
  5. Occupational exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer among Canadian men vol.5, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.581
  6. Effect of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure on pachytene spermatocyte cell quantity in Webster strain male mice vol.1073, pp.1742-6596, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/6/062047