DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Survey for Satisfaction Degree on Clinical Practice for Student in the Occupational Therapy Department

작업치료과 학생들의 임상 실습 만족도 조사

  • Lee, Insil (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Sungduk C.University) ;
  • Lee, Yoonmi (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Gumi University) ;
  • Jang, Chel (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Kyungnam College of Information & Technology)
  • 이인실 (성덕대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 이윤미 (구미대학교 작업치료과) ;
  • 장철 (경남정보대학교 작업치료과)
  • Received : 2013.01.23
  • Accepted : 2013.03.05
  • Published : 2013.03.31

Abstract

Purpose : This study was designed to investigate the satisfaction of clinical practice for in the occupational therapy department and to provide the basic materials for improvement the curriculum of clinical practice. Method : This research period was from May 10. 2012 to May 31. 2012. And the subject of was were belonging to occupational therapy department who finished clinical practice. Results : The research result is as following. As for the satisfaction of the clinical practice, the average point was 3.16 for 5, which was regular satisfaction. The satisfaction of clinical practice content point was 3.47 for 5. In detail, the item of 'clinical practice made us a new experience in relation to curriculum at college' scored 4.01, the highest. By contrast, the internal conflict during the clinical practice scored 2.63. In detail, the answer "I didn't feel sorry for failing this training" scored 2.4, which scored lowest. Conclusions : As the result of this research, students have feel the clinical training is the significant process for being a occupational therapist, and they also have satisfy what they experienced. And we can also tell that some of them have trouble because of the gap between the theory and clinical practice. To improve these problems, students should have confidences by preparing their clinical practice and external voluntary. Furthermore, for better clinical practice, we hope that the study on preparations for clinical practice will continue.

Keywords

References

  1. 강윤숙, 조희, 노영숙 등(2006). 학교-병원 협력실습교육 프로그램이 간호학생의 임상실무 수행능력과 만족도에 미치는 효과. 한국간호교육학회지, 12(1),13-20.
  2. 구혜자(2008). 간호학생이 지각한 가족지지와 임상실습 만족도와의 관계. 한국간호교육학회지, 14(2), 205-215. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2008.14.2.205
  3. 권혜진, 김보람, 김소연 등(2009). 서울지역 4년제 간호대학생들의 임상실습 유,무에 따른 진로태도성숙. 이화간호학회지, 43, 41-50.
  4. 김영숙(2000). 치위생과 학생들의 임상교육성취도에 미치는 영향. 수원여자대학 학술지.
  5. 김진경. 박소연. 이택영 등(2004). 작업치료(학)과 학생을 대상으로 한 임상실습에 관한 연구. 대한작업치료학회지. 12(1), 69-81.
  6. 박오장(1978). 간호학생임상실습평가에 대한 수간호원의 태도조사연구. 고려대학교.
  7. 이미자, 김경미, 이재신 등(2004). 작업치료 교육에 있어서 임상실습교육 현황 분석. 대한작업치료학회지, 12(2), 105-117.
  8. 이성은(2001). 대학 간호학생의 임상실습 만족도, 실습경험 분석 및 개선방향 제시-모성간호학 임상실습 중심. 한국간호 교육학회지, 7(2), 333-348.
  9. 이순희, 김숙영, 김정아(2004). 간호학생의 간호이미지와 임상실습만족도. 간호행정학회지, 10(2), 219-231.
  10. 이점덕(2006). 프리셉터 지도를 받은 간호학생의 비판적 사고성향, 임상수행능력 및 임상실습 만족도 연구. 전남대학교 대학원, 석사학위 논문.
  11. 이춘선(2002). 치위생과 학생의 실습여건 및 임상실습만족도와의 관계 연구. .동남보건대학 학술지.
  12. 이향숙. 노종수. 차정진 등(2010). 작업치료(학)과 학생들의 임상실습에 따른 전공취업에 대한 인식 변화. 대한작업치료학회지, 18(1), 107-120.
  13. 장분자, 송경희(2005). 일부 치위생과 학생의 임상실습에 대한 만족도 조사. 한국위생과학회지, 11(1), 81-90.
  14. 정영해(2004). 치기공과 대학생들의 임상실습 실태 및 만족도. 영남대학교 환경보건대학원, 석사학위 논문.
  15. 최미경. 전예숙. 홍원주 등(2004). 식품영양학과 학생들의 현장실습 만족도 및 평가도에 관한 연구. 한국식품영양과학회지, 33(2), 373-380. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.2.373
  16. 최병옥(1996). 일부 물리치료과 학생의 임상실습 만족도에 대한 연구. 대한물리치료사학회지, 3(3), 339-350.
  17. 천은숙(1995). 교육실습을통한교사사회화 과정에 관한연구. 성균관대학교 대학원.
  18. 한수정(2000). 임상실습시 간호학생이 지각하는 힘 북돋우기(empowerment)와 실습만족도에 관한 연구. 한국간호교육학회지, 6(1), 132-146.
  19. Adelstein LA, Cohn ES, Baker RC, et al(1990). A part-time level II fieldwork program. American Jouranl of Occupational Therapy, 44(1), 60-65. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.1.60
  20. Cohn ES, Frum DC(1998). The issue is Fieldwork supervision: More educational is warranted. American Joural of Occupational therapy, 42(5), 325-327.
  21. Creek K(1990). The knowledge base of occupaitonal therapy in occupational thrapy and mental health. NY: Churchill Livingstone.
  22. Crist PA, Cooper RG(1988). Nationally speaking-Evaluating clinical competence with the new fieldwork evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(12), 771-773. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.42.12.771
  23. Farrow S, Gaipman B, Rudman D(2002). Exploration of a group model in fieldwork education. Canadian Journal Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(4), 239-249.
  24. Hengel JL, Romeo JL(1995). A group approach to mental health fieldwork. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(4), 354-358. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.4.354
  25. National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy Inc(2008). Executive Summary for the practice analysis study: Practice Analysis. Gaithersburg: National Board for Certification in Occupational Therapy Inc.
  26. Neistadt ME, Cohn ES(1990). Evaluating a level I fieldwork model for independent living skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(8), 692-699. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.8.692
  27. Nolinske T(1995). Multiple mentoring relationships facilitate learning during fieldwork. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(1), 39-43. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.1.39
  28. Mitchell MM, Kampfe CM(1990). Coping strategies used by occupational therapy students during fieldwork: An exploratory study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 44(6), 543-550. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.6.543
  29. Phillips EC, Legaspi WS(1995). A 12-month internship model of level II fieldwork. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(2), 146-149. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.2.146
  30. Presseller S(1983). Nationally speaking-Fieldwork education: The proving ground of the profession. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(3), 163-165. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.37.3.163

Cited by

  1. 재난 및 외상 후 스트레스장애에 대한 작업치료 전공자의 인식조사 vol.18, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2017.18.7.539
  2. 작업치료과 대학생의 직업기초능력, 구직효능감 및 진로준비행동의 관계 vol.7, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2019.7.1.089
  3. 국내 작업치료 임상실습 연구에 관한 체계적 고찰 vol.18, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2020.18.9.433