대한물리의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine)

  • 제8권2호
  • /
  • Pages.245-252
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1975-311X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7215(eISSN)
대한물리의학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수정된 건측억제-환측유도치료(mCIMT)가 아급성기 뇌졸중환자의 상지기능과 일상생활수행능력에 미치는 영향

The Effects of the modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy on Upper Function and Activities of Daily Living in Subacute Stroke Patients

  • 방대혁 (대전대학교 일반대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 최성진 (대전대학교 일반대학원 물리치료학과) ;
  • 신원섭 (대전대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Bang, Dae-Hyouk (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School of Daejeon University) ;
  • Choi, Sung-Jin (Department of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School of Daejeon University) ;
  • Shin, Won-Seob (Department of Physical Therapy, Daejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2012.03.14
  • 심사 : 2013.05.20
  • 발행 : 2013.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to verify the effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy(mCIMT) on upper function and activities of daily living in people with subacute stroke patients. METHODS: Eighteen participants, with subacute stroke that were randomly assigned to either the experimental group(n=9) or the control group(n=9). For subjects from the experimental group modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy was performed. exercise program, the patient trained in affected side upper extremity with restricted non-affected side for 1 hour and using in activity daily living for 4 hours for five times per week, during 4 weeks. For subjects from the control group, conventional upper extremity training was performed. Outcomes such as the box and block test(BBT), Fugl-Meyer motor function assessment(FMA), and modified Barthel index(MBI) were measured before and after training. Between-group and within-group comparisons were analyzed by using Independent t-test and Paired t-test respectively. RESULTS: These finding suggest that experimental group was significant increase in BBT, FMA, MBI(p<.05). In comparison of two group, experimental group was high upper function and activity daily living than control group. CONCLUSION: This study showed experimental group can be used to improve upper function and activity daily living than control group. Thus it indicates that mCIMT will be more improved through the continued upper extremity exercise program.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Basmajian JV. The 38th annual John Stanley Coulter lecture. The Winter of Our Discontent: breaking intolerable time locks for stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(2):92-4.
  2. Bonifer N, Anderson KM. Application of constraint-induced movement therapy for an individual with severe chronic upper-extremity hemiplegia. Phys Ther. 2003;83(4):384-98.
  3. Bonita R, Mendis S, Truelsen T et al. The global stroke initiative. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3(7):391-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00800-2
  4. Brunner I, Skouen J, Strand L. Is modified constraint-induced movement therapy more effective than bimanual training in improving arm motor function in the subacute phase post stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;26(12):1078-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215512443138
  5. Cohen J. Stastistical power analysis for the behavioral science. San Diego, C.A., Academic Press, Lawrence Erlbam. 1988.
  6. Cromwell FS. Occupational therapist's manual for basic skill assessment: Primary prevetioal evaluation. Altadena, CA: Fair Oasks. 1976.
  7. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31(12):2984-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.12.2984
  8. Feys H, De Weerdt W, Selz B et al. Effect of a therapeutic intervention for the hemiplegic upper limb in the acute phase after stroke: a single-blind, randomized, controlled multicenter trial. Stroke. 1998;29(4):785-92. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.29.4.785
  9. Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A et al. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):517-23.
  10. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.
  11. Goldon WA. Advance in stroke rehabilitation. Harcourt Pulisher Ltd. 1993;
  12. Hayward K, Barker R, Brauer S. Interventions to promote upper limb recovery in stroke survivors with severe paresis: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(24):1973-86. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.481027
  13. Hobart JC, Thompson AJ. The five item Barthel index. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(2):225-30. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.71.2.225
  14. Hu XL, Tong KY, Li R et al. Post-stroke wrist rehabilitation assisted with an intention-driven functional electrical stimulation (FES)-robot system. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;1-6.
  15. Kwon YC, Park JH. Standardization of Korean of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K) for Use in the Elderly. Psychiatry investigation. 1989;28(1):125-35.
  16. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
  17. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 1985;39(6):386-91. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.39.6.386
  18. Nazzal M, Sa'adah MA, Al-Ansari D et al. Stroke rehabilitation: application and analysis of the modified Barthel index in an Arab community. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23(1):36-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280150211284
  19. Page SJ, Levine P, Sisto S et al. Stroke patients' and therapists' opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(1):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr473oa
  20. Page SJ, Sisto S, Johnston MV et al. Modified constraint-induced therapy in subacute stroke: a case report. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(2):286-90. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.28007
  21. Page SJ, Sisto S, Levine P et al. Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(1):14-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00481-7
  22. Platz T, van Kaick S, Mehrholz J et al. Best conventional therapy versus modular impairment-oriented training for arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23(7):706-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309335974
  23. Portney L, Wakin M. Foundation of clinical research; Applications to practice, 3rd ed. New Jersey, Prentice Hall. 2008.
  24. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR et al. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 1993;73(7):447-54.
  25. Schaechter J, Kraft E, Hilliard T et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(4):326-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/154596830201600403
  26. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacoott M. Motor control: Translating research into clinical practice(3rd ed). Philadelphia: William & Wilkins. 2006.
  27. Taub E, Crago JG. Constrainted-induced movement therapy: a new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1989;4(3)152-79.
  28. Wu CY, Chen CL, Tsai WC et al. A randomized controlled trial of modified constraint-induced movement therapy for elderly stroke survivors: changes in motor impairment, daily functioning, and quality of life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3):273-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.11.021
  29. Wu CY, Lin KC, Chen HC et al. Effects of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on movement kinematics and daily function in patients with stroke: a kinematic study of motor control mechanisms. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(5):460-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968307303411

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of Bilateral Arm Movement on Brain and Muscle Activity in Chronic Stroke Patients vol.13, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2018.13.1.1