DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Action Observation on Motor Function of Paretic Upper Extremity in Stroke Patients: Single Subject Study

동작관찰훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 마비측 상지기능에 미치는 영향: 단일사례연구

  • Jeong, Woo-Sik (Department of Physical Therapy, Nampyeong Noblesse silver hospital) ;
  • Yun, Tae-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, City rehabilitation hospital) ;
  • Choi, Yeon-Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, City rehabilitation hospital) ;
  • Lee, Hong-Gyun (Department of Physical Therapy, Dong-Shin University)
  • 정우식 (남평노블레스요양병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 윤태원 (씨티재활병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 최연정 (씨티재활병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 이홍균 (동신대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.12.26
  • Accepted : 2013.05.20
  • Published : 2013.05.31

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted in chronic hemiplegic patients to examine the effect of the training of the ipsilateral arm that is identical to the model performing movements and the training of the contralateral arm on the function of the arm. METHODS: The subjects were participated total 2 patients(the subject 1 with left hemiplegia and the subject 2 with right hemiplegia). The study was conducted for 4 weeks. The action observation training were repeated 10 times in 10 days during intervention period. The evaluation of the arm function such as BBT, MFT and MAL in the each subject were examined 5 times in the baseline period, 10 times during the intervention period and 5 times during the baseline regression period. RESULTS: The results of the evaluation in each subject were presented as mean values and video graphs. The arm function of the 2 subjects were improved during the intervention period in comparison with the baseline period, and the improvement was maintained even during the regression baseline period. In addition, there were large variation ratio of BBT and MAL (AOU, QOM) in comparison with subject 1. CONCLUSION: According to the results, the action observation training was more effective in improving upper limb function of stroke patients who imitate the performed behavior of paralyed parts on the same side.

Keywords

References

  1. Alaerts K, Heremans E, Swinnen SP et al. How are observed actions mapped to the observer's motor system? Influence of posture and perspective. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(2):415-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.012
  2. Bellelli G, Buccino G, Bernardini B et al. Action observation treatment improves recovery of postsurgical orthopedic patients: evidence for a top-down effect? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(10):1489-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.013
  3. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford. 1990.
  4. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. 2001;13(2):400-4.
  5. Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2003.
  6. Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser DM et al. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke. Stroke. 2008;39(6):1814-20. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508184
  7. Dobkin BH. Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008;4(2):76-85.
  8. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A et al. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. 2007;36(2):164-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
  9. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G et al. Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73(6):2608-11.
  10. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B et al. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science. 2005;308(5722):662-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106138
  11. Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L et al. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain. 1996;119(2):593-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593
  12. Garrison KA, Winstein CJ, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(5):404-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968309354536
  13. Kilner JM, Marchant JL, Frith CD. Relationship between activity in human primary motor cortex during action observation and the mirror neuron system. PLoS One. 2009;4(3):e4925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004925
  14. Kim JM, Yang BI, Lee MK. The effect of action observational physical training on manual dexterity in stroke patients. Physical therapy korea. 2010;17(2):17-24.
  15. Kim TH, Park SB. Differences in operating mechanism of action obsevation as task difficulty. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2007;46(3):127-34.
  16. Lee MK, Kim JM. The effect of action observational training on arm function in people with stroke. Physical therapy korea. 2011;18(2):27-34.
  17. Miyamoto S, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y et al. Reliability and validity of the manual function test in patients with stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(3):247-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181951133
  18. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Johnson BW, McNair NA. Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004;19(2):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.001
  19. Nishitani N, Hari R. Temporal dynamics of cortical representation for action. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(2):913-8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.913
  20. Pellegrino di G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L et al. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res. 1992;91(1):176-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00230027
  21. Pelosin E, Avanzino L, Bove M et al. Action observation improves freezing of gait in patients with Parkinson's disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24(8):746-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310368685
  22. Platz T, Pinkowski C, Van Wijck F et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(4):404-11. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr832oa
  23. Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L et al. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(3):491-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00248742
  24. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:169-92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230
  25. Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1996;3(2):131-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
  26. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2001;2(9):661-70. https://doi.org/10.1038/35090060
  27. Small SL, Buccino G, Solodkin A. The mirror neuron system and treatment of stroke. Dev Psychobiolo. 2010;54(3):293-310.
  28. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2493-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000185928.90848.2e
  29. Yang YP, Kim JH, Han MR et al. The effect of action observation training on affected side upper limb dexterity in stroke patient: single-subject research design. Journal of the korean society of physical medicine. 2012;7(1):111-8. https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2012.7.1.111
  30. Yun TW. The effect on mirror neuron system during action observation in chronic stroke patients through applying tDCS. Dong-Shin University. 2011.
  31. Yun TW, Lee MK. The change of mu rhythm during action observation in people with stroke. Journal of the korean society of physical medicine. 2011;6(3):361-8.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Convergency : Using Digital Contents Action Observation Educations and Task-Oriented Occupational Therapy on Activity of Daily Living and Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Stroke vol.13, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.7.445
  2. The Effect of Action Observation with Observation Type on Limits of Stability and Dynamic Gait Ability in Stroke Patients vol.12, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2017.12.1.67
  3. 과제지향적 상지 운동과 가상현실 훈련이 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 기능과 균형, 우울감에 미치는 영향 비교 vol.11, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2016.11.1.115
  4. 동작관찰 과제지향훈련이 만성 뇌졸중환자의 균형 및 보행능력에 미치는 효과 vol.6, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2018.6.2.045