Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Moderating Effect of Individual Factors on Information Systems(IS) Success Model

개인의 특성이 정보시스템 성공에 미치는 조절효과분석

  • Received : 2012.12.06
  • Accepted : 2013.03.27
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the success factors of information systems and the moderating effect of individual factors in mandatory environment. Methods: In order to test the model, a questionnaire survey is delivered from salespersons of an insurance company in Seoul, Korea. 200 questionnaires are finally analyzed. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) is adopted to analyze the data and Smart PLS 2.0 is used for examining the moderator effect. Results: The extended model proposed in this paper adopted individual factors and examined their moderator effect among constructs. An empirical test is carried out accordingly in order to test the model proposed in this paper. The results reveal that individual factors (i.e. Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Personal Innovativeness in IT) have a significant moderating effect on individual performance in the environment of mandatory information system usage. Conclusion: This paper extended the research field of information system success model to information systems in mandatory environment regarding differences of individual factors.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. 1998. "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology." Information Systems Research 9(2):204-15. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  2. Bagozzi, R. P., Richard P., and Yi, Y. 1998. "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models." Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1):74-94.
  3. Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Congnitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Barker, T., and Frolick, M. N. 2003. "ERP implementation Failure: A case Study." Information Systems Management 20(4):43-49. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43647.20.4.20030901/77292.7
  5. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation Confirmation Model." MIS Quarterly 25(3): 351-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  6. Ein-Dor, P., and Segev, E. 1978. "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems." Management Science 24(10):1067-77.
  7. Gattiker, T. F., and Goodhue, D. L. 2005. "What Happens after ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes." MIS Quarterly 29(3):559-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148695
  8. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R. 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study." Information Systems Research 14(2):189-217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  9. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. 1995. "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test." MIS Quarterly 19(2):189-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/249688
  10. Daft, R. L., and Steers, R. M. 1986. "Organizations: A Micro/Macro Approach, Scott, Foresman and Company, Illinois." (Reprinted by Pang-Han Publishing Company, Seoul).
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models." Management Science 35(8):982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  12. Davis, F. D. , Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. 1992. "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14):1111-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
  13. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 1992. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable." Information Systems Research 3(1):60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  14. DeLone, W. H., and McLean, E. R. 2003. "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A ten-Year Update." Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  15. Gatian, A. W. 1994. "Is user satisfaction a v alid measure of system effectiveness." Information & Management 26(3):119-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(94)90036-1
  16. Guental, H. G., Surprenant, N., and Bubeck, K. 1984. "Effectively Utilizing Computer-Aided Design Technology: The Role of Individual Difference Variables." Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Systems 21-30.
  17. Harrison A. W., and Rainner, R. K. JR. 1992. "The Influence of I ndividual Differences o n Skill in E nd-User Computing." Journal of Management Information Systems 9(1):93-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580539208906858
  18. Khalifa, M., and Liu, V. 2003. "Determinants of Satisfaction at Different Adoption Stages of Internet-Based Services." Journal of Association for Information System 4(5):206-32.
  19. Krasner, H. 2000. "Ensuring e-business success by learning from ERP failures." IT Professional 2(1):22-7.
  20. Lee, B. K., Kim J. J., and Ryu, L. 2009. "An Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing the Performance of Outbound Information System in Contact Center." The Journal of internet electronic commerce research 9(4):143-70
  21. Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., and Cheung, C. M. K. 2007. "How Habit Limits th Predictive Power of Intention: The Case of Information Systems Continuance." MIS Quarterly 31(4):705-37. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148817
  22. Lippke S., Wiedemann, A. U., Ziegelmann, J. P., Reuter, T., and Schwarzer, R. 2009. "Self-efficacy Moderates the Mediation of Intentions Into Behavior via Plans." American Journal of Health Behavior 33(5):521-29.
  23. Nah, F. F. H., Tan, X., and The, S. H. 2004. "An Empirical Investigation on End-User's Acceptance of Enterprise Systems." Information Resources Management Journal 17(3):32-53. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004070103
  24. Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th(ed.). NewYork: Free Press.
  25. Seddon, P. B., and Kiew, M. Y. 1994. "A Partial Test and Development of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS success." Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada(ICIS 94):99-110.
  26. Seddon, P. B. 1997. "A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Mode of IS Success." Information Systems Research 8(3):240-53. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  27. Thatcher, J. B., and Perrewe, P. L. 2002. "An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy." Mis Quarterly 26(4):381-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132314
  28. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies." Management Science 46(2):186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
  29. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View." MIS Quarterly 27(3):425-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  30. Wood, R. E., and Bandura, A. 1989. "Impact of Conceptions of Ability on Self-Regulatory Mechanisms and Complex Decision Making." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56(3):407-15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407