Journal of Korean Medical classics (대한한의학원전학회지)

The Society of Korean Medical Classics (대한한의학원전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of The Eumyang(陰陽) Theory between Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) and Juyeok(周易) - Focused on Gyesajeon(繫辭傳)-

"황제내경(黃帝內經)"과 "주역(周易)"의 음양론(陰陽論) 비교(比較) -"계사전(繫辭傳)"을 중심으로 -

  • Baik, You-Sang (Dept. of Oriental Medicine Classics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyunghee University)
  • 백유상 (경희대학교대학교 한의학과대학 원전학교실)
  • Received : 2013.01.21
  • Accepted : 2013.02.14
  • Published : 2013.05.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Through the comparison of the Eumyang(陰陽) theory between Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) and Juyeok(周易) Gyesajeon(繫辭傳) written by Gongja(孔子), the philosophical background of Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) and the position of Eumyang theory in the ancient academic society can be clearly understood. Method : The similarities and differences of the Eumyang theory in Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) and Juyeok(周易) Gyesajeon(繫辭傳) are categorized and analyzed comparing both texts. Results & Conclusion : Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) and Juyeok(周易) all recognized Eumyang movement as the most important and basic principle of the change of the universe. In the relationship between Eum(陰) and Yang(陽), the key of harmonization of them is to keep and practice the virtue of each others. The plentiful expression of Juyeok(周易) Gyesajeon(繫辭傳) about the relationship of Eumyang is helpful to understand and apply the concepts of Eumyang to daily life. The other hand, Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經) as medical text, concentrates upon the explanation about the movement and circulation of Gi(氣) between Eum and Yang.

Keywords

References

  1. 권영규. 음양오행의 동의학적 인식. 東西醫學. 1994. 19(3). pp.20-27.
  2. 金炳浩. 亞山의 周易講義. 서울. 小康出版社. 1999.
  3. 廖名春, 康學偉, 梁韋弦. 周易哲學史. 서울. 예문서원. 1994. pp.56-57, 86-88.
  4. 文載坤. 陰陽五行論의 展開에 관한 硏究(I). 哲學硏究. 1989. 13. pp.31-33.
  5. 成百曉譯註. 懸吐完譯周易傳義(上). 서울. 傳統文化硏究會. 1998. p.161, 174, 177, 185, 365, 369, 371, 373, 407, 422, 428, 486, 499, 530, 597, 599, 604. pp.356-358, 380-381, 399-400, 401-405, 410-411, 414-415, 418-419, 424-426, 488-489, 532-533, 535-536, 592-595.
  6. 成百曉譯註. 懸吐完譯周易傳義(下). 서울. 傳統文化硏究會. 1998. p.145, 147, 151, 157, 159, 188, 190, 192, 265, 267, 269, 271, 274, 309, 311, 318, 321, 323, 466, 474, 477. pp.8-9, 11-12, 13-14, 21-22, 148-149, 153-155, 162-166, 168-169, 172-176, 178-180, 182-186, 259-263, 456-458, 460-462, 470-471, 542-546, 578-585.
  7. 송갑준. 음양오행설의 사유체계. 人文論叢. 2001. 14. pp.116-117.
  8. 심귀득. 주역에서 음양의 조화에 관한 연구. 2004. 4. pp.6-8, p.12.
  9. 양력 저, 김충렬 역. 주역과중국의학. 서울. 법인문화사. 2007. pp.73-78.
  10. 尹暢烈. 음양오행론의 발생과 그 응용. 2006. 19(4). pp.214-215.
  11. 이정재. 陰陽五行論의 형성과 이의 응용연구. 한국문화연구. 2003. 7. p.185.
  12. 張祐彰. 黃帝內經素問生氣通天論의 陰陽體用觀에 대한 試論. 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌. 2010. 23(6). pp.73-85.
  13. 崔波, 李愛峰. 試論周易陰陽學說對中醫學的影響. 鄭州大學學報. 1999. 32(2). p.57.
  14. 賀娟. 從周易到內經的陰陽觀念流變. 北京中醫藥大學學報. 2008. 31(12). pp.811-814.
  15. 洪元植. 精校黃帝內經素問. 서울. 東洋醫學硏 究院. 1985. p.14, 20, 29, 31, 97, 112. pp.11-12, 16-17, 23-24, 233-234.
  16. 洪元植. 精校黃帝內經靈樞. 서울. 東洋醫學硏究院. 1985. p.36, 50.
  17. 華琼. 周易對中醫理論的影響. 中醫硏究. 2012. 25(6). p.12.

Cited by

  1. "황제내경(黃帝內經)"의 '음양(陰陽)'과 '태양(太陽).소양(少陽).소음(少陰).태음(太陰)'의 의미 고찰 vol.28, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.17208/kjopp.2014.12.28.6.577