DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Literature Review on Locator Attachment for Implant Overdenture

임플란트 피개의치를 위한 Locator 어태치먼트: 문헌 고찰

  • Cha, Min-Sang (Department of Dentistry, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 차민상 (강릉아산병원 보철과) ;
  • 김대곤 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2013.01.25
  • Accepted : 2013.06.25
  • Published : 2013.06.30

Abstract

The Locator attachment is used widely for implant retained overdenture. It can be used solitary and needs small vertical space. Locator can be applicable for parallel implants and divergent implants. Nylon male cap allow personalized retention for each case. In this literature review, initial retention force and changes in retention force of various attachments were evaluated. Rotation freedom and stress distribution around the attachment were reviewed. Moreover, patient satisfaction and maintenance care of Locator attachment were described. From all of the researches, it was drawn that Locator attachment can be used successfully and widely in several clinical situations.

Locator 어태치먼트는 임플란트 유지형 피개의치에 널리 사용하는 어태치먼트로 단일 임플란트에 연결하여 사용하는 개별유지장치이다. Locator 어태치먼트는 수직적으로 적은 공간을 필요로 하며, 유지력과 경사에 따른 나일론 선택이 가능한 특징을 가진다. 이 문헌고찰에서는 Locator 어태치먼트를 사용했을 때 초기유지력, 기능력을 재현한 상태의 유지력 변화에 관해 고찰하였다. 또한 회전자유도와 응력분포에 대해 연구한 문헌을 살펴보았으며 Locator에 관한 보철적 합병증과 유지관리를 연구한 다양한 문헌을 정리함으로써 Locator 어태치먼트의 한계와 장점에 관해 살펴볼 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. van Waas MA. The influence of clinical variables on patients' satisfaction with complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63(3):307-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90202-N
  2. Jivraj S, Chee W, Corrado P. Treatment planning of the edentulous maxilla. Br Dent J. 2006;201(5):261- 79; quiz 304. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813952
  3. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(1):78-9.
  4. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Bar overdentures utilizing the Locator attachment. Gen Dent. 2001;49 (2):210-4.
  5. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Restoration of divergent free-standing implants in the maxilla. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28(3):113-6. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0113:RODFII>2.3.CO;2
  6. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent. 2006;15(1):24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  7. Chung KH, Chung CY, Cagna DR, Cronin RJ Jr. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures. J Prosthodont. 2004;13(4): 221-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04042.x
  8. Alsabeeha N, Atieh M, Swain MV, Payne AG. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(2): 160-6.
  9. Rutkunas V, Mizutani H, Takahashi H. Influence of attachment wear on retention of mandibular overdenture. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34(1):41-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01640.x
  10. Sadig W. A comparative in vitro study on the retention and stability of implant-supported overdentures. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(4):313-9.
  11. Evtimovska E, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time. J Prosthodont. 2009;18(6): 479-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00474.x
  12. Abi Nader S, de Souza RF, Fortin D, De Koninck L, Fromentin O, Albuquerque Junior RF. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(3):157-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02145.x
  13. Yang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T, Kotecha S. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(11):1315-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02137.x
  14. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Schmitt S. The effect of simulated function on the retention of bar-clip retained removable prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 75(5):570-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90465-5
  15. Doukas D, Michelinakis G, Smith PW, Barclay CW. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(2):152-4.
  16. Uludag B, Polat S. Retention characteristics of different attachment systems of mandibular overdentures retained by two or three implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1509-13
  17. Al-Ghafli SA, Michalakis KX, Hirayama H, Kang K. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;102(3):140-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60134-7
  18. Chen IC, Brudvik JS, Mancl LA, Rubenstein JE, Chitswe K, Raigrodski AJ. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2011;106(2):78-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60099-1
  19. Alsabeeha NH, Swain MV, Payne AG. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(3):247-54.
  20. Ochiai KT, Williams BH, Hojo S, Nishimura R, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;91(5):421-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.017
  21. Damghani S, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implantretained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(6):358-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60090-0
  22. Celik G, Uludag B. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(4): 229-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.006
  23. Cakarer S, Can T, Yaltirik M, Keskin C. Complications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011;16(7):e953-9.
  24. Kleis WK, Kämmerer PW, Hartmann S, Al-Nawas B, Wagner W. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010;12(3):209-18.
  25. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM. Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22(3):330-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02004.x
  26. Mackie A, Lyons K, Thomson WM, Payne AG. Mandibular two-implant overdentures: three-year prosthodontic maintenance using the locator attachment system. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(4): 328-31.
  27. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bilmenoglu C. Maintenance requirements associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37(6):697-704. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00096
  28. Vere J, Hall D, Patel R, Wragg P. Prosthodontic maintenance requirements of implant-retained overdentures using the locator attachment system. Int J Prosthodont. 2012;25(4):392-4.
  29. Krennmair G, Seemann R, Fazekas A, Ewers R, Piehslinger E. Patient preference and satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or locator attachments: a crossover clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1560-8.
  30. El-Sheikh AM, Shihabuddin OF, Ghoraba SM. Two versus three narrow-diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: a two-year prospective study. Int J Dent. 2012;2012: 285684.
  31. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implantsupported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15(6):575-81.
  32. MacEntee MI, Walton JN, Glick N. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93(1):28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.013
  33. Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(2):99-105.
  34. Davis DM, Packer ME. Mandibular overdentures stabilized by Astra Tech implants with either ball attachments or magnets: 5-year results. Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(3):222-9.
  35. Karabuda C, Tosun T, Ermis E, Ozdemir T. Comparison of 2 retentive systems for implantsupported overdentures: soft tissue management and evaluation of patient satisfaction. J Periodontol. 2002;73(9):1067-70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.9.1067
  36. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Sulun T, Bilgin T. A quality-oflife comparison between self-aligning and ball attachment systems for 2-implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37 Spec No:167-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00070
  37. Cordaro L, di Torresanto VM, Petricevic N, Jornet PR, Torsello F. Single unit attachments improve peri-implant soft tissue conditions in mandibular overdentures supported by four implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(5):536-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02426.x
  38. Cheng T, Sun G, Huo J, He X, Wang Y, Ren YF. Patient satisfaction and masticatory efficiency of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures using the stud and magnetic attachments. J Dent. 2012;40 (11):1018-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.011
  39. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Mulder J, Vermeeren JI, Kalk W. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with three treatment modalities for overdentures on implants of the ITI Dental Implant System. A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(4):297-306. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100406.x
  40. Kilic K, Koc AN, Tekinsen FF, Yildiz P, Kilic D, Zararsiz G, Kilic E. Assessment of Candida Species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in bar- and locator- retained overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2012 Sep 28. [Epub ahead of print]
  41. Oh SC, Han JS, Kim MJ. Implant supported overdenture using milled titanium bar with Locator attachment on fully edentulous maxillae: a case report. J Korean Acad Stomatog Func Occ 2011;27 (2):223-31.
  42. Kim MS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012;4(2): 116-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.116

Cited by

  1. Rehabilitation of mandibular partial edentulous patient with remaining unilateral teeth using implant-assisted removable partial denture vol.42, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.42.02.201806.97
  2. 상악 부분 무치악 환자에서 Milled Bar와 Locator를 이용한 임플란트 융합 국소의치수복 증례 vol.58, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.2.137
  3. Locator R-Tx 부착 장치를 이용한 하악 임플란트 피개 의치 보철수복 증례 vol.58, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.4.335
  4. 하악 부분 무치악 환자에서 디지털 가이드 수술을 이용한 임플란트 융합 가철성 국소의치 수복 증례 vol.59, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.88