Journal of Internet Computing and Services (인터넷정보학회논문지)

Korean Society for Internet Information (한국인터넷정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytical Approach of Multicasting-based Fast Mobility Management Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Networks

프록시 모바일 IPv6 네트워크에서 멀티캐스팅기반 빠른 이동성관리 기법의 분석적 접근법

  • Received : 2012.08.10
  • Accepted : 2013.03.05
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In wireless networks, efficient mobility management to support of mobile users is very important. Several mobility management schemeshave been proposed with the aim of reducing the signaling traffic of MN(Mobile Node). Among them, PMIPv6 (Proxy Mobile IPv6) is similar with host-based mobility management protocols but MN does not require any process for mobility. By introducing new mobile agent like MAG (Mobile Access Gateway) and LMA (Local Mobility Anchor), it provides IP mobility to MN. In this paper, we propose the analytical model to evaluate the mean signalingdelay and the mean bandwidth according to the type of MN mobility. As a result of mathematical analysis, MF-PMIP (Multicasting-based FastPMIP) outperforms compared to F-PMIP and PMIP in terms of parameters for the performance evaluation.

무선 네트워크에서 효율적인 이동성관리는 모바일 사용자의 지원에 상당히 중요하다. 몇몇의 이동성관리 기법들은 MN(Mobile Node)의 시그널링 트래픽을 줄여주는 목적으로 제안되었다. 그 중에서 PMIPv6(Proxy Mobile IPv6)는 호스트 기반의 이동성관리 프로토콜과 유사하지만 MN에게 이동성에 대한 어떠한 처리도 요구하지 않는다. MAG(Mobile Access Gateway)와 LMA(Local Mobility Anchor)같은 새로운 모바일 에이전트를 도입하여 MN에게 IP 이동성을 제공한다. 본 논문에서, MN 이동성의 종류에 따라 호출 당 평균 시그널링 지연과 평균 대역폭을 평가하는 분석 모델을 제안한다. 수학적 분석의 결과로 MF-PMIP(Multicasting-based FastPMIP)는 거의 모든 성능평가 매개변수에 대하여 D-PMIP에 비해 우수한 성능을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. Johnson, C. Perkins, and J. Arkko, "Mobility Support in IPv6," IETF RFC 3775, June 2004.
  2. koodliR."Fast handovers for mobile IPv6," RFC 4068,July 2005.
  3. H. Soliman, C. Castelluccia, K. El-Malki, and L. Bellier, "Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Mobility Management HMIPv6," IETF RFC4140, August. 2005.
  4. Nadjia Kara, "Mobility Management Approaches for Mobile IP Networks: Performance Comparison and use Recommendations," IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING, Vol.8, pp.1312-1325, October 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2009.36
  5. Ibrahim AL-Surmi, Mohamed Othman, BorhanuddinMohd Ali, "Mobility management for IP-based next generation mobile networks:Review, challenge and perspective," Journal of Network and computer Applications,Vol.8, pp.2-20, September 2011.
  6. R. Ghai and S. Singh, "An Architecture and Communication Protocol for Picocellular Networks," IEEE Personal Comm., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 36-46, 1994.
  7. M. Stemm and R. Katz, "Vertical Handoffs in Wireless Overlay Networks," ACM Mobile Networking (MONET), special issue on mobile networking in the Internet, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 335-350, 1998.
  8. J. Wu and G. Maguire, "Agent-Based Seamless IP Multicast Receiver Handover," Proc. Conf. Personal Wireless Comm. (PWC'00), pp. 213-225, September. 2000.
  9. A. Mihailovic, M. Shabeer, and A.H. Aghvami, "Multicast for Mobility Protocol (MMP) for Emerging Internet Networks," Proc.11th IEEE Int'l Symp. Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Comm.(PIMRC '00), September. 2000.
  10. A. Helmy, M. Jaseemuddin, and G. Bhaskara, "Multicast-Based Mobility: A Novel Architecture for EffecientMicromobility," IEEEJ. Selected Areas in Comm. (JSAC), special issue on all IP wireless networks, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 677-690, May 2004.
  11. A. Festag, H. Karl, and A. Wolisz, "Investigation of Multicast- Based Mobility Support in All IP Cellular Networks," WirelessComm.and Mobile Computing, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 319-339, March. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcm.328
  12. A.S. Alfa and W. Li, "A Homogeneous PCS Network with Markov Call Arrival Process and Phase Type Cell Residence Time,"Wireless Networks, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 597-605, November. 2004.
  13. Y. Fang and I. Chlamtac, "Teletraffic Analysis and Mobility Modeling of PCS Networks," IEEE Trans. Comm., vol. 47, no. 7,pp. 1062-1072, July 1999. https://doi.org/10.1109/26.774856
  14. P. Orlik and S. Rappaport, "A Model for Teletraffic Performance and Channel Holding Time Characterization in Wireless Cellular Communication with General Session and Dwell Time Distributions," IEEE J. Selected Areas in Comm., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 788-803, June 1998. https://doi.org/10.1109/49.700913
  15. V. Paxson and S. Floyd, "Wide Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling," IEEE/ACM Trans. Networking, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 226-244, July 1995. https://doi.org/10.1109/90.392383
  16. W.W.H. Chan and V. Leung, "Performance Evaluations of PathOptimization Schemes for Inter-Switch Handoffs in Wireless ATM Networks," Wireless Networks, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 251-262, July 2000. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019197816601
  17. Sewon Yoo and Jongpil Jeong, "Aanlytical Approach of Fast Inter-Domain Handover Scheme in Proxy Mobile IPv6 Netwroks with Multicasting Support," KIPS Journal (Korean Edition), pp. 153-166, April 2012.