The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the convergent approaches for creativity in elementary mathematics education -Focused on Korean elementary mathematics textbooks and Investigations in the US-

초등수학교육에서 창의성 신장을 위한 융합적 접근의 탐색 -한국 초등수학교과서와 미국 Investigations를 중심으로-

  • Park, Mangoo (Department of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University of Education)
  • Received : 2013.04.11
  • Accepted : 2013.05.20
  • Published : 2013.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to analyze the convergent approaches for creativity in elementary mathematics textbooks in Korean and the united States. Convergent approaches have emphasized since NCTM(2000) consistently includes 'connections' as an important factor in mathematics curriculum and KOFAC(Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity) initiated the STEAM(Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) in mathematics and science education. For this research, two elementary mathematics textbooks were analyzed focused on their contexts and contents: Korean National Elementary Mathematics Textbooks and Navigations in Numbers, Data, and Space. In both textbooks, it was not easy to find so called the convergent approach in a real sense, but they use some contexts for connections between mathematical concepts and real world phenomena. For the enhancement of convergent approaches in mathematics education, we need to have a broader sense in the convergent approaches and develop various meaningful materials.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2011). 수학과 교육과정. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2011-3 61호 [별책 8]. 서울: 교육과학기술부.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics curriculum. MEST announcement 2011-361 [Separate version 8]. Seoul: MEST.)
  2. 교육과학기술부 (2012). 수학교육선진화방안. 교육과학기술부 보도자료.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2012). Advancement strategies of mathematics education. MEST report.)
  3. 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 1-2 학년군 1. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 1-2 (1). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
  4. 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 1-2 학년군 3. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 1-2 (3). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
  5. 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 3-4 학년군 1. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 3-4 (1). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
  6. 교육과학기술부 (2013). 초등학교 수학 국정교과서 3-4 학년군 3. 서울: 천재교육.(Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2013). Korean national elementary mathematics textbook grades 3-4 (3). Seoul: Chunjae Education.)
  7. 김태열 (2009). 산업계 '통섭' 깜짝 제품을 낳다. 서울: 위클리 경향.(Kim, T. Y. (2009). 'Consilience' in industry produced surprising products. Seoul: Weekly Kyunghyang.)
  8. 노상우, 안동순 (2012). 초등학교 융합인재교육(STEAM) 의 발전 방향. 교육종합연구, 10(3) 75-96.(Kho, S. W. & Ahn, D. S. (2012). The direction of STEAM in elementary school. Education Integration Research, 10(3) 75-96.)
  9. 박만구 (2007). 참여수학을 통한 수학교육 활성화를 위한 모델 개발. 한국학교수학회논문집, 10(4), 425-457.(Park, M. (2007). The development of model for enhancement of mathematics education through participatory mathematics. Journal of Korean School Mathematics, 10(4), 425-457.)
  10. 박만구 (2011). 창의성 신장을 위한 초등수학 과제의 유형. 초등수학교육, 14 (2), 117-134.(Park, M. G. (2007). The types of elementary mathematical tasks for enhancement of mathematical creativity. Elementary Mathematics Education, 14(2), 117-134.)
  11. 박형주 (2012). 통합 교육에 근거한 중학교 수학 교과서 분석-STEAM교육을 중심으로. 이화여자대학교 석사 학위 논문.(Park, H. J. (2012). An analysis on the middle school mathematics textbooks based on integration education-Focused on STREAM education. Master thesis at Ewha Woman's University.)
  12. 송신철, 홍보라, 김남희, 한화정, 심규철 (2012). 고등학교 융합형 '과학'과목 운영에 대한 고등학생과 과학교사의 인식 조사 연구. 과학교육연구지, 36(1), 130-138.(Song, S. C., Hong, B. R., Kim, N. H., Han, W. J., & Shim, K. C. (2012). The perceptions of high school students and science teachers toward the practice of high school convergent type 'science' subject. Journal of Science Education Research, 36(1) 130-138.)
  13. 오명석 (2012). 지식의 통섭(通涉)과 인류학. 비교문화연구, 18(2), 175-222.(Oh, M. S. (2012). Consilience of knowledge and anthropology. Comparative Literature Research, 18(2) 175-222.)
  14. 윤회정, 윤원정, 우애자 (2011). 2009 개정 교육과정과 융 합형 과학 교과서에 대한 고등학교 과학교사들의 인 식. 교과교육학연구, 15(3), 757-776.(Yun, H. J., Yun, W. J., & Woo A. J. (2011). 2009 revised curriculum and the perceptions of high school science teachers toward convergent science textbooks. Subject Pedagogical Research, 15(3), 757-776.)
  15. 위수정 (2010). 미국 유아교육에서 드라마와 수학의 통합 교육과정에 관한 질적사례연구. 한국실천유아교육학회, 15 , 37-59.(Wie, S. J. (2010). A qualitative case study on American drama in early childhood education and mathematics integrative education curriculum. Korean Early Childhood Education of Practice, 15, 37-59.)
  16. 이경진, 김경자 (2012). 통합교육과정 접근으로서의 "융합인재교육(STEAM)"의 의미와 실천 가능성 탐색. 한국초등교육학회, 25(3), 55-81.(Lee, K. J. & Kim, K. J. (2012). The meaning of exploratory possibility of practice of STEAM as integrative education curriculum. The Society of Korean Elementary Education, 25(3) 55-81.)
  17. 이인식 (2008). 지식의 대융합. 서울: 고즈원.(Lee, I. S. (2008). The mega convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Kozwon.)
  18. 이혜숙 , 임혜미, 문종은 (2010). 수학과학통합교육의 설계 및 실행에 대한 연구. 수학교육, 49(2), 175-198.(Lee, H. S., Lim, H. M., & Moon, J. E. (2010). A study on the design and practice of integrative education of mathematics and science. Mathematics Education, 49(2) 175-198.)
  19. 임유나 (2012). 통합 교육과정에 근거한 융합인재교육 (STEAM)의 문제점과 개선 방향. 한국초등교육학회, 25(4), 53-80.(Lim, Y. N. (2012). The problems and improvement of STEAM education based on the integrative education curriculum. The Society of Korean Elementary Education, 25(4) 53-80.)
  20. 정정희, 김신아, 배재정 (2007). 사회수학 통합활동이유 아의 사회적 기술과 수학적 문제해결력에 미치는 영 향. 유아수학, 16(4), 247-259.(Chung, J. H., Kim, S. H., & Bae, J. J. (2007). The influence on the toddler's social skills and mathematical problem solving ability of socal science and mathematics integration. Early Childhood Mathematics, 16(4) 247-259.)
  21. 정진수, 김동원, 임재근, 이윤정, 김은애, 임성만 (2012). 고교 융합형 '과학' 교과서에 대한 학생들의 의견. 대한지구과학학회지, 5(2), 189-196.(Jung, J. S., Kim, D. W., Lim, J, K., Lee, Y. J., Kim, E. A., & Lim, S. M. (2012). The students' opinions on the convergence 'science' textbooks. Journal of Korean Earth Science Education, 5(2) 189-196.)
  22. 조향숙, 김훈, 허준영 (2012). 현장 적용 사례를 통한융 합인재교육(STEAM)의 이해. 한국과학창의재단 현안 보고 CR 2012-02-02.(Cho, H. S., Kim, H., &Hur, J. Y. (2012). The understanding of STEAM education through field application cases. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity report. CR 2012-02-02.)
  23. 최민자 (2010). 통섭의 기술: 지식시대에서 지성시대로. 서울: 도서출판 모시는 사람들.(Cha, M. J.. (2010). The skill of convergence: From knowledge era to intelligence era. Seoul: Publisher Moshien SaramDeul.)
  24. 최재천 (2006). 생명의본질과 지식의 통섭(統攝 ): The Nature of Life and Consilience of Knowledge. 서울 대학교 천문학과 콜로퀴움 자료.(Cha, J. J.. (2006). The nature of life and consilience knowledge. Seoul: unpublished paper at a colloquium at the department of astronomy at Seoul National University.)
  25. 최재천, 장재익 (2005). 통섭: 지식의 대통합. 서울: 사이 언스북스.(Cha, J. J. & Jang, J. I. (2005). Consilience: The mega convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Sciencebooks)
  26. 최정훈 (2011). 융합을 기반으로 하는 STEAM 교육이란? 월간 과학창의 2월호 . 4-7.(Cha, J. H. (2011). What is STEAM education based on convergence? Monthly Science Creativity, February, 4-7.)
  27. 하혜정, 박현주, 김종학, 손정우, 김용진 (2012). 고등학교 융합형 '과학'의 교수 활동에 대한 생물 교사들의 어려움. 생물교육, 40(2), 267-277.(Ha, H. J., Park, H. J., Kim, J. H., Son, J. W., & Kim, Y. K. (2012). The difficulties of biology teachers on the convergence high school 'science' teaching and learning activities. Biology Education, 40(2) 267-277.)
  28. 황농문 (2008). 인생을 바꾸는 몰입. 서울: 랜덤하우스.(Whang, N. M. (2008). Life changing flow. Seoul: Randomhouse.)
  29. 황혜정 외 (2010). 창의 중심의 수학 수업 내실화 및 평가방안 연구. 한국과학창의재단 보고서 2010-2.(Whang, H. J. et al. (2010). A study on the effective mathematics lessons based on creativity. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity report. CR 2010-02.)
  30. 홍영기 (2008). 수학.과학 교과의 주제중심 통합프로그램의 효과. 통합교육과정연구, 3(2), 42-68.(Hong, Y. K. (2008). The effects of thematic integration program on mathematics and science subjects. Integration Education Curriculum Research, 3(2) 42-68.)
  31. Berlin, D. F. & White, A. L. (2012). A longitudinal look at attitudes and perceptions related to the integration of mathematics, science, and technology education. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00111.x
  32. Hudson, L. (1967). Contrary imaginations: A psychological study of the English schoolboy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  33. Jones, I., Lake, V, E., & Dagli, U. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics methods and preservice teachers' understanding of constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25, 165-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/1090102050250209
  34. Mullis. I. V. S., Martin, M. O., &Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report. Retrieved on April 2, 2013 at http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/TIMSS2007/PDF/TIMSS2 007_ InternationalMathematicsReport.pdf.
  35. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  36. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  37. Sheffield, L. J. (2006). Developing mathematical promise and creativity. Proceedings of the 11th International Seminar on Education of Gifted Students in Mathematics, 1-7.
  38. Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14(1), 19-34.
  39. Stinson, D., & Wager, A. (2012). Teaching mathematics for social justice: Conversations with educators. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  40. TERC (2008). Investigations: in numbers, data, and space. Glenview, IIL: Pearson.
  41. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J, S, Purcell, J, Leppien, J, & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  42. Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Cited by

  1. A co-authorship network analysis on mathematics education scholars vol.52, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2013.52.4.483
  2. A Study on Convergence Curriculum Development for Idea Creation vol.12, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.2.571