DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia

  • Kim, Hee-Kyung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2013.04.12
  • 심사 : 2013.08.14
  • 발행 : 2013.08.31

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of polishing and glazing on the color and spectral distribution of monolithic zirconia. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-five monolithic zirconia specimens ($16.3mm{\times}16.4mm{\times}2.0mm$) were fabricated and divided into 5 groups according to the number of A2-coloring liquid applications (Group I to V). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups according to the method of surface treatments (n=3): N: no treatment; P: polishing; G: glazing. Color and spectral distribution of five different areas of each specimen were measured according to CIELAB color space in the reflectance mode relative to the standard illuminant D65 on a reflection spectrophotometer. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test, Pearson correlation and regression analysis (${\alpha}$=.05). RESULTS. There was a significant difference in CIE $L^*$ between Subgroup N and P, and in CIE $b^*$ between Subgroup P and G in each group. Spectral reflectance generally decreased in Subgroup P and G in comparison with Subgroup N. Color differences between Subgroup P and G were within the perceptibility threshold (${\Delta}E{^*}_{ab}$ < 3.7) in most groups. Highly significant correlation was found between CIE $b^*$ and each subgroups as the number of coloring liquid applications increased ($R^2$ >0.88, P<.001). CONCLUSION. A perceptible color difference can be detected after polishing of monolithic zirconia. Polishing decreases the lightness, and glazing also decreases the lightness, but increases the yellowness of monolithic zirconia.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Weinstein M, Katz S, Weinstein AB. Fused porcelain-to-metal teeth. US patent No 3052, 982. 1962.
  2. Pröbster L, Diehl J. Slip-casting alumina ceramics for crown and bridge restorations. Quintessence Int 1992;23:25-31.
  3. Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x
  4. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:231-8.
  5. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2010;37:641-52.
  6. Ha SR, Kim SH, Han JS, Yoo SH, Jeong SC, Lee JB, Yeo IS. The influence of various core designs on stress distribution in the veneered zirconia crown: a finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:187-97. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.2.187
  7. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings-a new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.019
  8. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2006;22:857-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.014
  9. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008;17:9-13.
  10. Wiskott HWA. Fixed prosthodontics: principles and clinics. London; Quintessence publishing Co. Ltd; 2011. p. 670-1.
  11. Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47: 157-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90180-9
  12. Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:631-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90284-J
  13. Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;71:174-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90027-2
  14. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:405-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023206716774
  15. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.009
  16. Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergün G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008;17:20-4.
  17. Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE). Colorimetry, CIE 015. 3rd ed. Vienna: CIE Central Bureau; 2004.
  18. Obregon A, Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Effects of opaque and porcelain surface texture on the color of ceramometal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:330-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90222-5
  19. Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface conditions on the color of dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;63:657-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10383
  20. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;10: 325-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90041-8
  21. Knispel G. Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to natural teeth. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:525-31.
  22. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:4-9.
  23. Baldissara P, Llukacej A, Ciocca L, Valandro FL, Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/ CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:6-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60086-8
  24. Rosenstiel SF, Baiker MA, Johnston WM. Comparison of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2:524-9.
  25. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989; 68:819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301

피인용 문헌

  1. The effect of powder A2/powder A3 mixing ratio on color and translucency parameters of dental porcelain vol.7, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.5.400
  2. Influence of Accelerated Aging on the Color Stability of Dental Zirconia vol.28, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12239
  3. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics vol.8, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.37
  4. Color Aspect of Monolithic Zirconia Restorations: A Review of the Literature pp.1059941X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12906
  5. Digital veneering system enhances microtensile bond strength at zirconia coreveneer interface vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-168
  6. Does Surface Finishing Method Can Alter the Colour of Monolithic Zirconia Restoration? vol.19, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjdm-2015-0047
  7. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry vol.30, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470
  8. Comparative fracture behavior of monolithic and veneered zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses vol.36, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2016-391
  9. Effect of glazing and aging on optical properties of high-translucency zirconia vol.44, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14815/kjdm.2017.44.4.319
  10. Clinical evaluation of monolithic zirconia crowns for posterior teeth restorations vol.98, pp.40, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017385
  11. Influence of the Arabic-Coffee on the Overall Color of Glazed or Polished Porcelain Veneers - In vitro Study vol.13, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601913010364
  12. Effect of glazing on translucency, color, and surface roughness of monolithic zirconia materials vol.31, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12493
  13. Different polishing methods for zirconia: impact on surface, optical, and mechanical properties vol.24, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-02953-6
  14. An in vitro study to compare the surface roughness of glazed and chairside polished dental monolithic zirconia using two polishing systems vol.20, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_339_19
  15. Spectrophotometric examination of the optical effects of monolithic multilayered zirconia with different substrates vol.119, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2019.1707412
  16. Color and masking properties of translucent monolithic zirconia before and after glazing vol.65, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00039
  17. Effect of home and over the contour bleaching on stainability of CAD / CAM esthetic restorative materials vol.33, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12604
  18. Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures Using a Complete Digital Workflow: Two‐Year Follow‐Up vol.30, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13251
  19. Effect of surface finishing and polishing procedures on color properties and translucency of monolithic zirconia restorations at varying thickness vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12681
  20. Effect of Two Brands of Glaze Material on the Flexural Strength and Probability of Failure of High Translucent Monolithic Zirconia vol.14, pp.22, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14227022
  21. Effects of surface treatments and abutment shades on the final color of high-translucency self-glazed zirconia crowns vol.126, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.09.010
  22. Optical Properties and Color Stability of Dental PEEK Related to Artificial Ageing and Staining vol.13, pp.23, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13234102