DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Measurements and Evaluations on the Configurations of Absorptive and Diffusing Treatments in Classrooms using a Scale Model

축소모형법을 이용한 흡음재와 확산체 배치조건별 교실의 음향성능 측정 및 평가

  • 최영지 (전북대 공과대학 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2012.09.06
  • Accepted : 2013.01.18
  • Published : 2013.01.30

Abstract

The present study examines the effects of periodic type diffusers for producing the preferred acoustics for speech and determines the more successful configurations of sound-absorbing and diffusing treatments for achieving good acoustics in classrooms. The measurements were carried out in a 1/10 scale model classroom systematically adding diffusers to one or more of four surfaces of the room. A total of 13 combination of diffusers with absorptive treatments were investigated. Adding diffusers on the ceiling were more effective to increasing the early-arriving reflection energy($G_{50}$) than adding absorptive materials on the entire ceiling. The late arriving reflection energy($G_{late}$) was decreased with increasing amounts of diffusing treatments of upper front or rear wall and this resulted in achieving higher early-to-late ratios($G_{50}$). Adding diffusers on the upper front wall($AC_{100}DUFW_{26}$) achieved more uniform acoustical conditions over the receiver positions than adding diffusers on the upper rear wall($AC_{100}DUFW_{26}$). Adding diffusers on the ceiling and absorptive materials on the lower front wall($AC_{75}DC_{25}ALFW_{26}$) achieved better acoustical conditions than adding the absorptive materials on the entire ceiling and lower front wall($AC_{100}ALFW_{26}$).

Keywords

References

  1. J.S. Bradley: Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80(1986) 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393908
  2. J.S. Bradley, R. Reich and S.G. Norcross: On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(1999) 1820-1828. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427932
  3. J.S. Bradley, H. Sato and M. Picard: On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106(2003) 3233-3244.
  4. H. Sato and J.S. Bradley: Evaluation of acoustical conditions for speech communication in working elementary school classrooms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123(2008) 2064-2077. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2839283
  5. J.S. Bradley, R. Reich and S.G. Norcross: A just noticeable difference in C50 for Speech. Applied Acoustics 58(1999) 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00075-9
  6. T.T. Cox, W.J. Davies and Y.W. Lam: The sensitivity of listeners to early sound field changes in auditoria. Acustica 79(1993) 27-41.
  7. Y.-J. Choi, The application of 1-dimensional diffusers in classroom acoustics. Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities 84(2011) 3-11.

Cited by

  1. Interior surface treatment guidelines for classrooms according to the acoustical performance criteria vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7776/ASK.2016.35.2.092