Computers and Concrete

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The anchorage-slip effect on direct displacement-based design of R/C bridge piers for limiting material strains

  • Mergos, P.E. (Technological Educational Institute of Chalkida)
  • Received : 2011.10.25
  • Accepted : 2012.11.14
  • Published : 2013.06.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Direct displacement-based design (DDBD) represents an innovative philosophy for seismic design of structures. When structural considerations are more critical, DDBD design should be carried on the basis of limiting material strains since structural damage is always strain related. In this case, the outcome of DDBD is strongly influenced by the displacement demand of the structural element for the target limit strains. Experimental studies have shown that anchorage slip may contribute significantly to the total displacement capacity of R/C column elements. However, in the previous studies, anchorage slip effect is either ignored or lumped into flexural deformations by applying the equivalent strain penetration length. In the light of the above, an attempt is made in this paper to include explicitly anchorage slip effect in DDBD of R/C column elements. For this purpose, a new computer program named RCCOLA-DBD is developed for the DDBD of single R/C elements for limiting material strains. By applying this program, more than 300 parametric designs are conducted to investigate the influence of anchorage slip effect as well as of numerous other parameters on the seismic design of R/C members according to this methodology.

Keywords

References

  1. Alsiwat, J. and Saatcioglu, M. (1992), "Reinforcement anchorage slip under monotonic loading", J. Struct. Eng., 118(9), 2421-2438. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:9(2421)
  2. Beyer, K., Dazio, A. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2011), "Shear deformations of slender R/C walls under seismic loading", ACI Struct. J., 108(2), 167-177.
  3. Calvi, G.M. and Sullivan, T.A. (2009), Model code for the displacement based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  4. Dwairi, H.M., Kowalsky, M.J. and Nau, J.M. (2007), "Equivalent viscous damping in support of direct displacement-based design", J. Earthq. Eng., 11(4), 512-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601033884
  5. Fardis, M.N. (2009), Seismic design, assessment and retrofitting of concrete buildings, Springer.
  6. fib Task Group 7.1 (2003), Seismic assessment and retrofit of R/C buildings, fib Bull. 24, Lausanne.
  7. fib Task Group 7.2 (2003), Displacement-based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings, fib Bull. 25, Lausanne.
  8. Filippou, F. (1985), A simple model for reinforcing bar anchorages under cyclic excitations, Rep. EERC-85/05, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
  9. Grant, D.N., Blandon, C.A. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2005), Modeling inelastic response in direct displacement-based design, Report 2005/03, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  10. Kappos, A.J. (1991), "Analytical prediction of the collapse earthquake for R/C buildings: suggested methodology", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 20(2), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290200206
  11. Kappos, A.J. (2002), RCCOLA-90: Program for the inelastic analysis of R/C cross sections, Imperial College, London.
  12. Lehman, D. and Moehle, J.P. (1998), Seismic performance of well confined concrete bridge columns, PEER Report 1998/01, Univ. of California, Berkeley.
  13. Lowes, L. and Altoontash, A. (2003), "Modeling reinforced concrete beam-column joints subjected to seismic loading", J. Struct. Eng., 129(12), 1686-1697. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:12(1686)
  14. Ma, S.M., Bertero, V.V. and Popov, E.P. (1976), Experimental and analytical studies on hysteretic behaviour of R/C rectangular and T-beam, Report EERC 76-2, University of California, Berkeley.
  15. Mahin, S.A. and Bertero, V.V. (1977), RCCOLA: A computer program for reinforced concrete column analysis - user's manual and documentation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley.
  16. Mander, J.B., Priestley M.J.N. and Park, R. (1986), "Theoretical stress- strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1825.
  17. Mergos, P.E. and Kappos, A.J. (2008), "A distributed shear and flexural flexibility model with shear-flexure interaction for R/C members subjected to seismic loading", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 37(12), 1349-1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.812
  18. Mergos, P.E. and Kappos, A.J. (2010), "Seismic damage analysis including inelastic shear-flexure interaction", B. Earthq. Eng., 8(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9161-2
  19. Mergos, P.E. (2011), Assessment of seismic behaviour of existing R/C structures, PhD Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
  20. Mergos, P.E. and Kappos, A.J. (2012), "A gradual spread inelasticity model for R/C beam-columns, accounting for flexure, shear and anchorage slip", Eng. Struct., 44, 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.035
  21. Otani, S. and Sozen, M. (1972), Behavior of multistory R/C frames during earthquakes, Struct. Res. Series 392, University of Illinois, Urbana.
  22. Park, R. and Sampson, R.A. (1972), "Ductility of reinforced concrete column sections in seismic design", ACI Struct. J., 69(9), 543-551.
  23. Paulay, T. and Priestley, M.J.N. (1992), Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  24. Priestley, M.J.N. (1993), "Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering -conflicts between design and reality", B. NZSEE, 26(3), 329-341.
  25. Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2000), "Direct-displacement based seismic design of concrete buildings", B. NZSEE, 33(4), 421-444.
  26. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-based seismic design of structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  27. Saatcioglu, M. and Ozcebe, G. (1989), "Response of reinforced concrete columns to simulated seismic loading", ACI Struct. J., 86(1), 3-12.
  28. Sezen, H. and Setzler, E.J. (2008), "Reinforcement anchorage slip under monotonic loading", ACI Struct. J., 105(3), 280-289.
  29. Shibata, A. and Sozen, M. (1976), "Substitute structure method for seismic design in reinforced concrete", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 102(1), 1-18.
  30. Soroushian, P., Kienuwa, O., Nagi, M. and Rojas, M. (1988), "Pullout behaviour of hooked bars in exterior beam-column connections", ACI Struct. J., 85(3), 269-276.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of a DDB design method for bridges isolated with triple pendulum bearings vol.59, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.59.5.803
  2. Experimental Study on Strain Penetration Effects in Fixed-End Rotation of RC Beam-Column Connections with High-Strength Reinforcement vol.2018, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9127167
  3. Strain penetration of high-strength steel bars anchored in reinforced concrete beam-column connections vol.72, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.72.3.367