DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Winkler Springs (p-y curves) for pile design from stress-strain of soils: FE assessment of scaling coefficients using the Mobilized Strength Design concept

  • Bouzid, Dj. Amar (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Medea) ;
  • Bhattacharya, S. (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol) ;
  • Dash, S.R. (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology)
  • Received : 2012.11.29
  • Accepted : 2013.05.08
  • Published : 2013.10.25

Abstract

In practice, analysis of laterally loaded piles is carried out using beams on non-linear Winkler springs model (often known as p-y method) due to its simplicity, low computational cost and the ability to model layered soils. In this approach, soil-pile interaction along the depth is characterized by a set of discrete non-linear springs represented by p-y curves where p is the pressure on the soil that causes a relative deformation of y. p-y curves are usually constructed based on semi-empirical correlations. In order to construct API/DNV proposed p-y curve for clay, one needs two values from the monotonic stress-strain test results i.e., undrained strength ($s_u$) and the strain at 50% yield stress (${\varepsilon}_{50}$). This approach may ignore various features for a particular soil which may lead to un-conservative or over-conservative design as not all the data points in the stress-strain relation are used. However, with the increasing ability to simulate soil-structure interaction problems using highly developed computers, the trend has shifted towards a more theoretically sound basis. In this paper, principles of Mobilized Strength Design (MSD) concept is used to construct a continuous p-y curves from experimentally obtained stress-strain relationship of the soil. In the method, the stress-strain graph is scaled by two coefficient $N_C$ (for stress) and $M_C$ (for strain) to obtain the p-y curves. $M_C$ and $N_C$ are derived based on Semi-Analytical Finite Element approach exploiting the axial symmetry where a pile is modelled as a series of embedded discs. An example is considered to show the application of the methodology.

Keywords

References

  1. Adhikari, S. and Bhattacharya, S. (2011), "Vibrations of wind-turbines considering soil-structure interaction", Wind Struct. Int. J., 14(2), 85-112. https://doi.org/10.12989/was.2011.14.2.085
  2. Amar Bouzid, Dj. (2011), "Finite element analysis of a piled footing under horizontal loading", Geomech. Eng. Int. J., 3(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2011.3.1.029
  3. Amar Bouzid, Dj. and Vermeer, P.A. (2009), "Fourier series based FE analysis of a disc under prescribed displacements-elastic stress study", Arch. Appl. Mech., 79(10), 927-937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00419-008-0264-z
  4. Amar Bouzid, Dj., Tiliouine, B. and Vermeer, P.A. (2004), "Exact formulation of interface stiffness matrix for axisymmetric bodies under non-axisymmetric loading", Comput. Geotech., 31(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2004.01.007
  5. American Petroleum Institute (API) (2001), Recommended Practice for Planning Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms . Load and Resistance Factor design, 21st Edition.
  6. Baguelin, F., Frank, R. and Said, Y.H. (1977), "Theoretical study of lateral reaction mechanism of piles", Geotech., 27(3), 405-434. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1977.27.3.405
  7. Bolton, M.D. (2012), Performance-Based Design in Geotechnical Engineering, 52nd Rankine Lecture, ICE, Paper to appear in Geotechnique.
  8. Bouafia, A. (2007), "Single piles under horizontal loads in sand: determination of P-Y curves from the prebored pressuremeter test", Geotech. Geol. Eng., 25(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-006-9110-7
  9. Bowles, J.E. (1996), Foundation Analysis and Design, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, London.
  10. Byrd, P.F. and Friedman, M.D. (1971), Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  11. Chaudhry, A.R. (1994), "Static pile-soil-pile interaction in offshore pile groups", Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
  12. COMSOL multiphysics user guide (2009), Version - 3.5a Edition, COMSOL AB Stockholm, Sweden.
  13. Cook, R.D., Malkus, D.S., Plesha, M.E. and Witt, R.J. (2001), Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th Edition, Wiley, New York.
  14. Cox, W.R., Reese, L.C. and Grubbs, B.R. (1974), "Field testing of laterally loaded piles in sand", Proceedings 6th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 459-472.
  15. Dash, S.R., Bhattacharya, S., Blackborough, A. and Hyodo, M. (2008), "P-Y curve to model lateral response of pile foundations in liquefied soils " The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  16. DNV (2001), Guidelines for Design of Wind Turbines, Publication from DNV/Riso in technical co-operation.
  17. Einav, I. and Randolph, M.F. (2005), "Combining upper bound and strain path methods for evaluating penetration resistance", Int. J. Numer. Method. Eng., 63(14), 1991-2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1350
  18. Frank, R. (2009), "Design of foundations in Trance with the use of Menard pressuremeter tests (MPM)", Soil Foundation Eng., 46(6), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11204-010-9069-5
  19. Hajialilue-Bonab, M., Azarnya-Shahgoli, H. and Sojoudi, Y. (2011), "Soil deformation pattern around laterally loaded piles", Int. J. Phys. Model. Geotech., 11(3), 116-125.
  20. Klar, A. (2008), "Upper bound for cylinder movement using elastic fields and its possible application to pile deformation analysis", Int. J. Geomech., 8(2), 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:2(162)
  21. Martin, C.M. and Randolph, M.F. (2006), "Upper bound analysis of lateral pile capacity in cohesive soil", Geotech., 56(2), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2006.56.2.141
  22. Matlock, H. (1970), "Correlation for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay", O.shore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, April.
  23. McClelland, B. and Focht, J.A.J. (1958), "Soil modulus for laterally loaded piles", Transactions, ASCE, 123(1), 1049-1063.
  24. Osman, A.S. and Bolton, M.D. (2005), "Simple plasticity-based prediction of the undrained settlelment of shallow circular foundations on clay", Geotech., 55(6), 435-447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.6.435
  25. Randoph, M.F. and Houslby, G.T. (1984), "The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil", Geotech., 34(4), 613-623. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1984.34.4.613
  26. Reese, L.C. and Impe, W.F.V. (2001), Single Piles and Pile Groups under Lateral Loading, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Brookfield.
  27. Reese, L.C., Cox, W.R. and Koop, F.D. (1974), "Analysis of laterally loaded piles in sand", Proceedings of 6th Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 473-483.
  28. Reese, L.C., Wang, S.T., Isenhower, W.M. and Arrellaga, J.A. (2000), Computer Program LPILE Plus Version 4.0 Technical Manual, Ensoft, Inc., Austin, Texas.
  29. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Taylor, R.L. (1991), The Finite Element Method, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill, London.

Cited by

  1. A numerical procedure to correlate the subgrade reaction coefficient with soil stiffness properties for laterally loaded piles using the FSAFEM 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1365475
  2. Undrained behaviour of two silica sands and practical implications for modelling SSI in liquefiable soils vol.66, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.07.010
  3. Static Response of Monopile to Lateral Load in Overconsolidated Dense Sand vol.143, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001698
  4. Dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine in clay considering soil–monopile–tower interaction vol.63, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.03.006
  5. Construction of simplified design p–y curves for liquefied soils vol.67, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.15.P.116
  6. Impact of climate change on dynamic behavior of offshore wind turbine vol.35, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1257671
  7. A practical method for construction of p-y curves for liquefiable soils vol.97, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.03.002
  8. Probabilistic analysis of monopile-supported offshore wind turbine in clay vol.105, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.11.028
  9. Predicting long term performance of offshore wind turbines using cyclic simple shear apparatus vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.010
  10. p-y-ẏ curves for dynamic analysis of offshore wind turbine monopile foundations vol.90, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.015
  11. Design of monopile supported offshore wind turbine in clay considering dynamic soil–structure-interaction vol.73, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.02.017
  12. Design of monopiles for offshore wind turbines in 10 steps vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.09.024
  13. Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Dynamic and Long-Term Behavior of Offshore Wind Turbines in Clay vol.41, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20170043
  14. Dynamic analysis of monopile supported offshore wind turbines vol.170, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.16.00022
  15. Evaluation of seismic performance of pile-supported models in liquefiable soils vol.45, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2716
  16. Dynamic analyses and field observations on piles in Kolkata city vol.8, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.3.415
  17. Computation of degradation factors of p-y curves in liquefiable soils for analysis of piles using three-dimensional finite-element model vol.89, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.017
  18. Variability of subgrade reaction modulus on flexible mat foundation vol.13, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.5.757
  19. Study on the Dynamic Soil-Pile-Structure Interactive Behavior in Liquefiable Sand by 3D Numerical Simulation vol.10, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082723
  20. Physical Modelling of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundations for TRL (Technology Readiness Level) Studies vol.9, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9060589
  21. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Nonlinear Pile-Soil Interaction Responses Using 3D Pile Element Model vol.21, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002076