Journal of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회지)

Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research (한국항해항만학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Priority Evaluation of Preliminary Cases for IMO Information Management System using Fuzzy TOPSIS and AHP

퍼지 TOPSIS&AHP를 이용한 IMO 정보관리시스템 예비과제 우선순위 평가

  • Jang, Woon-Jae (Division of Int'l Maritime Transportation Science, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 장운재 (목포해양대학교 국제해사수송과학부)
  • Received : 2013.07.24
  • Accepted : 2013.09.16
  • Published : 2013.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper is aimed to priority evaluation of preliminary cases for IMO -IMS(International Maritime Organization- Information Management System) using fuzzy TOPSIS(Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process). To this solve, therefore, this paper extract 24 preliminary cases and select 4 major preliminary alternative cases after analysing the structure of its alternative cases using FSM(Fuzzy Structure Modeling). Also, the weights of evaluation factors determine using AHP which able to keep the consistency when decision-makers assess. In AHP method, but, the numbers of paired comparison incerase as much as the numbers of the comparison items increase and because this evaluation have the many of vagueness, the decision of final ranking is used to fuzzy TOPSIS method which is included TOPSIS and Fuzzy Set Theory. The result are developed as order as Management of IMO Convention Information, Delivery of IMO Convention Information, Total IMO Database, Knowledge Hub of IMO Convention Information in IMO-IMS.

본 연구는 퍼지 TOPSIS법과 AHP법을 이용하여 IMO 정보관리시스템의 예비과제 우선순위를 평가하기 위한 것이다. 이러한 평가를 위해 먼저 24개의 예비과제를 추출하여 FSM법을 이용하여 대체안을 구조화하였고, 최종 4개의 주요 예비과제를 도출한다. 또한 평가항목간의 가중치는 의사결정자의 일관성을 유지하면서 평가가 가능한 AHP법을 이용한다. 그러나 AHP법은 비교대상의 수가 증가하면 쌍대비교의 횟수가 증가하고, 평가에는 수많은 애매성이 존재하기 때문에 최종 우선순위 선정에는 TOPSIS에 퍼지이론을 도입한 퍼지 TOPSIS법을 이용한다. 그 결과 IMO 기준정보관리, IMO 정보기준전달, IMO 통합데이터베이스, IMO 지식허브 순으로 구축되어야 하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang, D. Y.(1996), "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  2. Chen, C. T.(2000), "Extension of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-making under Fuzzy Environment", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 114, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00377-1
  3. Dagdeviren, M. Yavuz, S. Kilinc, N.(2009), "Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment", Expert Systems with Applications, pp. 8143-8151.
  4. Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K.(1981), Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications, A State of the Art Survey. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  5. Jang, W. J,, Cho, I. S., Cho, M. C.(2012), "Anaysis of Structure for IMO Documents Information Plan", Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety 2012 Fall Conference, pp. 369-371.
  6. Keum, J. S,, Youn, M. O., Jang, W. J.(2001), "Assessment of the Navigational Safety Level in the Korean Coastal Waterway", Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 39-48.
  7. Kim, K. Y., Kim, D. H,(2012), "Disaster Recovery Priority Decision of Total Information System, for Port Logistics : Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach", Korea Society of IT Services. Vol. 11. No. 3, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2012.11.3.001
  8. Lim.J.S(2007), Developement Method of Company Information, Comunicationbooks.