DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system

건설공사 사후평가 수행결과 활용도 개선 방안

  • 이두헌 (한국건설기술연구원 건설관리.경제연구실) ;
  • 박재우 (한국건설기술연구원 건설관리.경제연구실)
  • Received : 2013.07.29
  • Accepted : 2013.10.22
  • Published : 2013.11.30

Abstract

Post-evaluation system reflects the results of performing a public construction project in the future similar public construction projects to be utilized in the planning. However, the current system simply compares the expected values, such as demand, B/C ratio, cost of construction, construction period, with the actual values after the completion of construction. In addition, most public owner does not actively conduct the post-construction evaluation tasks, so that the evaluation results has not been returned to early stage of a construction project. In this study, status of the post-construction evaluation system is investigated by a survey of the public owner and the construction project evaluation system of the United States and Japan was analyzed. This paper presents the improvement scheme of utilization of the results of the post-construction evaluation system. Through improving the post-construction evaluation system, it is expected that public agencies would easily utilize the post-construction evaluation.

건설공사 사후평가 제도는 공공건설사업 수행결과를 반영하여 향후 유사한 공공건설사업의 계획 수립 시 활용되어져야 하나, 현행 제도는 당초 기획 계획 당시에 추정한 수요, B/C비율, 공사비, 공사기간 등 예측치와 건설공사 완공후 일정기간(3년 내지 5년) 경과후에 측정한 실제 결과치를 단순히 비교하여 제시하는 수준에 그치고 있다. 또한 대부분 공공발주기관에서는 수동적인 사후평가 업무수행에 그치고 있어 제대로 환류가 이루어지않고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 공공발주기관을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 건설공사 사후평가 제도의 수행현황을 파악하였으며, 국내 사후평가 제도와 유사한 미국과 일본의 건설사업 평가체계를 벤치마킹하였다. 또한, 건설공사 사후평가 제도와 관련된 국토부 실무담당자와의 수차례 업무회의를 실시하여 사후평가 수행의 적시성 확보 및 활용성 강화방안을 제시하였다. 이와 같이 건설공사 사후평가 제도 개선을 통해 건설사업 수행과정에서의 목표 및 성과에 대한 확인 점검 분석 체계를 내실화하고, 건설공사 특성별로 평가내용 및 방법을 차등화함으로써 발주청의 사후평가 수행에 대한 실천력이 제고될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Construction Industry Advancement Committee (2009). "The public projects efficiency plan". Construction Industry Institute of US
  2. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2012). "Study on the substantiality plan of construction project post-evaluation systems", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs,
  3. Korea Institute of Construction Technology (2009). "Study on the improvement plan of Construction Project Performance Management and Evaluation Systems", Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  4. Lee, D., Park, H., and Lee, K. (2006). "Industry's Perception of Construction Technology Policy for Public Sector Projects", Korean journal of Construction Enginnering and Management, KICEM, 7(3), pp. 122-129.
  5. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (1999). "Comprehensive plan for the efficiency of public construction projects".
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Japan
  7. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2011). "Transportation facility investment evaluation guidelines (4th revision)".
  8. National Assembly Budget Office (2009). "Evaluation of total operating expenses management system".
  9. Public Procurement Service (2012). "Analysis of construction cost for each type of Public Buildings in 2011".
  10. The Korea Transport Institute (2010). "Study on the improvements of the post-evaluation implementation methods of transportation Investment Projects".
  11. Transportation Research Institute (2001). "Study on the investment evaluation Guidelines of transportation facilities".
  12. The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea, Evaluation and Research Institute (2006). "Study on the improvement plan of evaluation systems for Efficient SOC project operation", pp. 9-14.
  13. Yoon, T., and Lee, S. (2011), "A Study on the Improvement of Item for Discrimination Increasing in Post Evaluation of Public Building Construction Project", Korean journal of Construction Enginnering and Management, KICEM, 12(2), pp. 21-31. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2011.12.2.21

Cited by

  1. Development of the Construction Post-evaluation System in Public Construction Projects vol.15, pp.12, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.12.7364