DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Indicators for Dredging Evaluation and Form on Erosion Control Dam Using the Delphi Technique and AHP Analysis

델파이 기법과 AHP를 이용한 중력식 사방댐 준설 평가지표 및 조사야장 개발

  • Seo, Junpyo (Department of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Changwoo (Department of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Woo, Choongshik (Department of Forest Disaster Management, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Heonho (Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University)
  • 서준표 (국립산림과학원 산림방재연구과) ;
  • 이창우 (국립산림과학원 산림방재연구과) ;
  • 우충식 (국립산림과학원 산림방재연구과) ;
  • 이헌호 (영남대학교 산림자원학과)
  • Received : 2014.08.04
  • Accepted : 2014.11.11
  • Published : 2014.12.31

Abstract

A dredging on erosion control dam has been enforced without evaluation the factors that affect the dredging. In addition, there is the negative effect much more than positive effect by dredging on erosion control dam. Therefore, this study was carried out to develop evaluation indicators and to suggest fieldbook in order to determine whether sand deposits at erosion control dam should be dredged up or not. The most important six evaluation indicators that can decide to dredge up at erosion control dam were obtained from three round delphi technique and were selected in the following order: the current sand deposit ratio(0.339), existence of cultivated land and house downstream(0.276), the slope of streambed(0.162), the amount of movable soil and gravel(0.118), the history of any disasters(0.063), the basin area(0.043). The weighted score for each evaluation indicator were acquired from AHP analysis with respect to the degree of importance and then the modified weighted score for actual measurements were classified as three categories: large(2.53), medium(1.60) and small(1.01). Based on delphi technique, erosion control dam dredging evaluation fieldbook introduced the four evaluation indicators out of the total six evaluation indicators and two low effected evaluation indicators were excluded. This results showed that the values for reliability analysis and consistency ratio were acceptable.

Keywords

References

  1. Chaiy SI. 2004. Social research method and analysis. 3rd ed. Seoul: Hak hyun sa. (in Korean)
  2. Cho KT․Cho YG and Kang HS. 2003. The analytic hierarchy process. Seoul: Dong hyun publisher. (in Korean)
  3. Cho SH.Kim TS and Lee YC. 1998. A Study on the Aggregation of Multi-Experts Priorities Using Compatibility in the AHP. Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society. 23(4): 131-140. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Hsu, C. C and Sandford, B. A. 2007. The Delphi Technique: Making Sense of Consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12(10): 1-8.
  5. Jang JC. 2003. Effect of debris barrier. Journal of Korean Forest Society. Seoul: Korean Forest Society. pp.61-81. (in Korean with English summary)
  6. Jung YG.Lee JH and Lee HH. 2012. The Effect of the Dredge of Debris barrier on Forest Recreation. Journal of the Korea Institute of Forest Recreation. 16(4): 1-8. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Kim KD and Choi K. 2012. A Study on the Policy of Sustainable Domestic Timber Supply Using Delphi Technique and AHP. Korean Forest Society. 101(3): 434-442. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Kim MI.Lee MS and Chang BS. 2011. Improvement of Domestic Debris Facility and Maintenance System. Korea institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection. 15(1): 400-405. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. Korea Forest Research Institute. 2012. Investigation & Analysis for Dredging Standard of Debris Barrier. (in Korean)
  10. Korea Forest Service. 2007. The history of 100 years of erosion control works in Korea. (in Korean)
  11. Korea Forest Service. 2011. Developing on the types of specific multi-functional debris barrier. (in Korean)
  12. Lawshe, C. H. 1975. A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY. Personnel Psychology 28(4): 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  13. Lee CW.Joh SH.Park KH.Kim MS.Yoon HJ and Hassanul RA. 2012. Quality Grading of Concrete Soil Erosion Control Dam in the Aspect of Unconfined Concrete Strength by Surface-Wave Technique. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 101(3): 412-425. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. Lee CW.Kwon YT and Yun JH. 2004. Development of Dredging Index for the Rational Remediation of Polluted Coastal Sediments. Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environmental Engineering. 7(2): 70-74. (in Korean with English summary)
  15. Lee SH.Jung CS.Kim JS.Jung HJ and Kim MS. 2012. A Study on the Management Guidelines of Erosion Control Facilities in National Forest(I) -The Inspection Results of Erosion Control Facilities from 2009 to 2011-. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 101(2): 251-258. (in Korean with English summary)
  16. Linstone, H. A and Turoff, M. 1975. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Addison Wesley.
  17. Park JD. 2012. Analysis of Relative Importance and Priority of Civil Servant's Education Training Policy: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. The Korea Contents Society. 12(4): 263-272. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.04.263
  18. Park JH.Ma HS.Kim KH and Youn HJ. 2011. Influences of the Construction of the Torrent Control Structure using Customized Tetrapods on the Stream Water Quality at Valley. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 100(1): 105-111. (in Korean with English summary)
  19. Park KH.Kim MS.Joh SH.Lee CW.Youn HJ and Kim K. H. 2013. Study on the Stability Evaluation of Concrete Erosion Control Dam by using Non-destructive Test for Compressive Strength. Jeju: Korean Forest Society. pp. 90-96. (in Korean with English summary)
  20. Park MB.Nam EW.Lee HJ and Shin TS. 2008. A Study of Priority Setting of Healthy City Project Indicators with the use of AHP Model. KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH EDUCATION AND PROMOTION. 25(3): 139-151. (in Korean with English summary)
  21. Park YK.Song JE.Kwon SD.Kim EH and Chung JS. 2008. Evaluation of Permission Standards for Forest Land-use Conversion using Delphi Technique. Journal of Korean Forest Society. 97(6): 617-626. (in Korean with English summary)
  22. Ryu TK and Jang KK. 1998. Effect of Soil Erosion Control Dam. Journal of Life Science and Natural resources Research. 20: 42-47. (in Korean with English summary)
  23. Saaty, T. L. 1990. The Analytic Hierarchy Process:Planing, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. RWS Publications.
  24. Seo JP. 2012. Assessment of Topographical Changes in a Dredged Area of a Debris Barrier by Using Terrestrial LiDAR. M.phil. dissertation, Yeungnam University. (in Korean)
  25. Song SH.Gwon SH.Park JB and Hong SK. 2009. Application of the Delphi Technique in Modifying AHP Method. Korea Management Science Review. 26(1): 53-64. (in Korean with English summary)
  26. Tak JK. 2007. Psychological Testing. Seoul: Hak ji sa. (in Korean)
  27. Yun JS. 2013. Determining the Priority of Lifelong Education Promotion Policy in Gyeongsangnamdo through AHP Analysis. The Korea Contents Society. 13(5): 517-526. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.05.517