Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회지)

The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science (한국초지조사료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of BMR Variety and Corn Grain (Grounded) Supplement on Silage Quality of Sorghum × Sudan Hybrids

수수 · 수단그라스 사일리지 제조에 있어 BMR 품종과 파옥쇄 첨가 효과

  • Kwon, Chan Ho (Department of Horse / Companion and Wild Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joong (Department of Animal Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Sangbuem (Animal Resources Research Center, Konkuk University)
  • 권찬호 (경북대학교 말특수동물학과) ;
  • 김은중 (경북대학교 축산학과) ;
  • 조상범 (건국대학교 동물자원연구센터)
  • Received : 2014.12.02
  • Accepted : 2014.12.22
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the productivity of $Sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ (SX17) hybrid and BMR (brown mid rib) $Sorghum{\times}sudangrass$ hybrid and silage quality of these forages with corn grain supplementation. The effect of corn grain supplementation on the quality of silages was also investigated. No remarkable differences at growth characteristics and productivities in two hybrids were found. Sugar content, however, in stem of BMR hybrid showed significantly great (p<0.05) and the difference between two hybrids was about $2B^{\circ}$. Ratio of lactic acid in total organic acid in BMR hybrid (82.8%) was significantly greater than the control (SX17 hybrid) (78.5%) (p<0.05). Ratio of butyric acid in total organic acid in SX17 hybrid (18.5%) was significantly greater than BMR hybrid (9.8%) (p<0.05). According to the result of organic acid ratio, it could be assumed that the use of BMR hybrid can improve silage quality. NDF and ADF contents in both SX17 and BMR hybrids were significantly declined with increased corn grain supplementation (p<0.05). Different TDN values in SX17 (56.2) and BMR (57.1) hybrids were detected. However, TDN values of both SX17 and BMR hybrid silages were significantly elevated by increasing the proportion of ground corn (p<0.05).

유기 축산을 위한 여름철 사료작물인 수수 수단그라스교잡종은 생산성이 높고, 잡초발생이 미미하며, 병충해에 의한 피해도 작아서 무농약 재배에 적합하다. 그러나 수수 수단그라스 교잡종은 당 함량이 부족하고, 수분 함량이 높아서 낙산발효로 인해 사일리지 품질에 문제가 있다. 최근 육성된 BMR (Brown Mid Rib) 품종은 줄기 내 당도가 높게 개발되었다. 따라서 본 시험은 기존의 수수 수단교잡종과 BMR 수수 수단교잡종을 재배하여 사일리지로 제조하고, 수분 조절 및 영양소 보충을 위해 파옥쇄를 첨가하여 사일리지의 품질변화를 관찰하였다. 수수 수단교잡종과 BMR 수수 수단교잡종 사이에 생육특성 및 생산성은 차이가 없었으나 줄기내 당 함량은 BMR 품종이 약 $2B^{\circ}$ 정도 높은 경향을 나타내었다(p<0.05). 유기산 중 lactic acid의 비율은 대조구(SX17품종)의 78.5%에 비해 BMR 품종은 82.8%로 유의적으로(p<0.05)에 높았고, butyric acid의 비율은 대조구(SX17품종)의 18.5%에 비해 BMR 품종은 9.8%로 유의적으로(p<0.05)에 낮아서 BMR 품종을 사용할 경우 품질이 크게 개선되었다. 파옥쇄 첨가시 첨가수준간에는 NDF 및 ADF 함량은 대조구(SX17) 품종과 BMR 품종(Diamond BMR) 모두 유의적으로 감소하였다(p<0.05). TDN 함량 역시 대조구(SX17) 품종의 56.2와 BMR 품종(Diamond BMR)의 57.1간에는 유의적 차이가 없었다. 그러나 파옥쇄 첨가시에는 대조구(SX17) 품종과 BMR 품종(Diamond BMR) 모두에서 파옥쇄의 첨가수준에 따라 TDN 함량이 유의적으로 증가하였다(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Cherney, J.H., Cherney, D.J.R, Akin, D.E. and Axtell, J.D. 1991. Potential of brown-midrib, low-lignin mutants for improving forage quality. Crop Science. 46:157-198.
  2. Di Marco, O.N., Ressia, M.A., Arias, S., Aello, M.S. and Arzadun, M. 2009. Digestibility of forage silages from grain, sweet and bmr sorghum types: Comparison of in vivo, in situ and in vitro data. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 153:161-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.003
  3. Goering, H.K. and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agriculture Handbook. 379. USDA-ARS, U.S. Government. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
  4. Gregory, W.R. and Harper, J.K. 2014. Forage Sorghum. Penn State Extension. Publication Series: Agronomy Facts 48 sorghum silage.
  5. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. The pioneer forage manual. A nutritional guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred Int. Inc., Des Moines, LA.
  6. Kim, J.D. 2011. The present status and invigoration of organic husbandry using organic forage production in Korea. Proceeding of 2011 Annual Meeting and International Symposium of Korean Association of Organic Agriculture. Korea. pp. 96-113.
  7. Kim, J.D., Kim, S.G. and Kwon, C.H. 2006. Effect of single, inter and mixed cropping on the agronomic characteristics, weeds and forage yield of corn and sorghum. Chinese Journal of Grassland Science 16 (Suppl.):57-58.
  8. Kim, J.D., Kwon, C.H., Chae, S.H. and Kim, C.H. 2007. Comparison of production and cost between conventional and organic forage crops. International Grassland Congress. China.
  9. Kim, J.D., Kwon, C.H. and Kim, D.A. 2001. Yield and quality of silage corn as affected by hybrid maturity, planting date and harvest stage. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science. 14:1705-1711. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2001.1705
  10. Kim, J.D., Lee, H.J., Jeon, K.H., Yang, G.-Y., Kwon, C.H., Sung, H.G., Hwangbo, S. and Jo, I.H. 2010. Effect of harvest stage, wilting and crushed rice on the forage production and silage quality of organic whole crop barely. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 30:25-34. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2010.30.1.025
  11. Kim, J.D., Shim, K.S., Lee, H.J., Jeon, G.H., Lee, M.H., You, Y.Y., Oh, E.Y. and Lee, H.W. 2011. Evaluation of organic sudangrass silage for feed value, silage quality and palatability in Korea. The 17th IFOAM Organic World Congress, Korea.
  12. Kwon, C.H., Kim, J.D., Kim, S.G. and Kim, C.H. 2006. Effect of corn grain addition on forage quality and production cost of sorghum silage. Chinese Journal of Grassland Science 16 (Suppl.):59-61.
  13. Li, J., Wang, L., Zhan, Q., Liu, Y., Fu, B. and Wang, C. 2013. Sorghum BMR6 mutant analysis demonstrates that a shared MYB1 transcription factor binding site in the promoter links the expression of genes in related pathways. Functional & Integrative Genomics 13:445-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-013-0335-2
  14. Lim, H.J., Kim, J.D., Lee, H.J., Jeon, K.H., Yang, K.-Y., Kwon, C.H. and Yoon, S.H. 2009. Effect of pre-wilting on the forage quality of organic Sorghum x Sudangrass silage. Journal of Organic Agriculture. 17:519-527.
  15. Linn, J.G. and Martin, N.P. 1989. Forage quality tests and interpretation. AG-FO-2637, Minnesota Extension, USA.
  16. Marsalis, M.A., Angadi, S.V. and Contreras-Govea, F.E.. 2009. Dry matter yield and nutritive value of corn, forage sorghum, and BMR forage sorghum at different plant populations and nitrogen rates. Field Crop Research 116:52-57.
  17. Marten, G.C., Goodrich, R.D., Schmid, A.R., Meiske, J.C., Jordan R.M. and Linn, J.G. 1975. Evaluation of laboratory methods for determining quality of corn and sorghum silages: II. Chemical methods for predicting In vivo digestibility. Agronomy Journal. 67:247-251. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700020019x
  18. McDonald, P. 1981. The biochemistry of silage. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. England.
  19. SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System Version. 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  20. Van Soest, P.J. and Roberson, J.B. 1980. Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. p. 49-60. In W.J. Pigden et al.(ed.) Proc. Int. Workshop on standardization Anal. Meth. Feeds. Ottawa, Canada. 12-14 Mar. 1979. Unipub., New York.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Agronomic Characteristics, Forage Production and Quality of Kenaf (Hongma 300), Maize (Kwangpyeongok) and Sorghum × Sudangrass Hybrids (Jumbo) in Middle Region of Korea vol.35, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.2.152