DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultimate strength performance of tankers associated with industry corrosion addition practices

  • Kim, Do Kyun (Civil Engineering Department, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS) ;
  • Kim, Han Byul (Structure Research Department, Hyundai Maritime Research Institute, Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Zhang, Xiaoming (OPR Offshore Pipelines & Risers Inc.) ;
  • Li, Chen Guang (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence), Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Paik, Jeom Kee (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (Lloyd's Register Foundation Research Centre of Excellence), Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Published : 2014.09.30

Abstract

In the ship and offshore structure design, age-related problems such as corrosion damage, local denting, and fatigue damage are important factors to be considered in building a reliable structure as they have a significant influence on the residual structural capacity. In shipping, corrosion addition methods are widely adopted in structural design to prevent structural capacity degradation. The present study focuses on the historical trend of corrosion addition rules for ship structural design and investigates their effects on the ultimate strength performance such as hull girder and stiffened panel of double hull oil tankers. Three types of rules based on corrosion addition models, namely historic corrosion rules (pre-CSR), Common Structural Rules (CSR), and harmonised Common Structural Rules (CSR-H) are considered and compared with two other corrosion models namely UGS model, suggested by the Union of Greek Shipowners (UGS), and Time-Dependent Corrosion Wastage Model (TDCWM). To identify the general trend in the effects of corrosion damage on the ultimate longitudinal strength performance, the corrosion addition rules are applied to four representative sizes of double hull oil tankers namely Panamax, Aframax, Suezmax, and VLCC. The results are helpful in understanding the trend of corrosion additions for tanker structures.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References

  1. ALPS/HULL, 2013. A computer program for progressive collapse analysis of ship hulls. [computer program] DRS Defense Solutions Avaliable at: [Accessed 10 January 2014]
  2. DNV, 2005. Rules for classification of ships-Hull structural design ship with length 100 meters and above. Oslo: Det Norske Veritas.
  3. Gratsos, G.A., Psaraftis, H.N. and Zachariadis, P., 2009. The Life cycle cost of maintaining the effectiveness of a ship's structure and environmental impact of ship design parameters. Royal Institution of Naval Architect (RINA) Conference on the Design and Operation of Bulk Carriers, Athens, Greece, 26-27 October 2009, pp.1-16.
  4. Gratsos, G.A., Psaraftis, H.N. and Zachariadis P., 2010. Life-cycle CO2 emissions of bulk carriers: A comparative study. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 152(A3), pp.119-134.
  5. Guedes Soares, C., Garbatov, Y., Zayed, A. and Wang, G., 2008. Corrosion wastage model for ship crude oil tanks. Corrosion Science, 50(11), pp.3095-3106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.035
  6. Hughes, O.F. and Paik, J.K., 2010. Ship structural analysis and design. New Jersey: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers.
  7. IACS, 2006a. Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
  8. IACS, 2006b. Common structural rules for bulk carriers. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
  9. IMO, 2012. Harmonised common structural rules (CSR-H) for oil tankers and bulk carriers. London: International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) - MSC 87/5/6.
  10. Kim, D.K., Kim, B.J., Seo, J.K., Kim, H.B., Zhang, X.M. and Paik, J.K., 2014a. Time-dependent residual ultimate longitudinal strength - grounding damage index (R-D) diagram. Ocean Engineering, 76, pp.163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.023
  11. Kim, D.K., Kim, S.J., Kim, H.B., Zhang, X.M., Li, C.G. and Paik, J.K., 2014b. Ultimate strength performance of bulk carriers with various corrosion additions. Ships and Offshore Structures. [online] Available at: [Accessed 10 January 2014] .
  12. Kim, D.K., Park, D.K., Kim, J.H., Kim, S.J., Kim, B.J., Seo, J.K. and Paik, J.K., 2012a. Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hull oil tankers - Part I: stiffened panels. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 42(4), pp.507-530. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.4.507
  13. Kim, D.K., Park, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B., Kim, B.J., Seo, J.K. and Paik, J.K., 2012b. Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hull oil tankers - Part II: hull girders. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 42(4), pp.531-549. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.4.531
  14. Kim, M.S. and Cheng, Y.F., 2012. Limit states rules: Past experiences and future scenarios. The 11th International Marine Design Conference (IMDC 2012), Glasgow, UK, 11-14 June 2012, pp.427-439.
  15. Mohd Hairil, M., Kim, D.K., Kim, D.W. and Paik, J.K., 2014. A time-variant corrosion wastage model for subsea gas pipelines. Ships and Offshore Structures, 9(2), pp.161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2013.770724
  16. Mohd Hairil, M. and Paik, J.K., 2013. Investigation of the corrosion progress characteristics of offshore subsea oil well tubes. Corrosion Science, 67, pp.130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.10.008
  17. Paik, J.K., Amlashi, H., Boon, B., Branner, K., Caridis, P., Das, P., Fujikubo, M., Huang, C.H., Josefson, L., Kaeding, P., Kim, C.W., Parmentier, G., Pasqualino, I.P., Rizzo, C.M., Vhanmane, S., Wang, X. and Yang, P., 2012a. Ultimate strength - final report of ISSC III.1. Germany: International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2012).
  18. Paik, J.K. and Kim, D.K., 2012. Advanced method for the development of an empirical model to predict time-dependent corrosion wastage. Corrosion Science, 63, pp.51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2012.05.015
  19. Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K. and Kim, M.S., 2009. Ultimate strength performance of suezmax tanker structures: pre-CSR versus CSR designs. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 151(A2), pp.39-58.
  20. Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B. and Kim, M.S., 2012b. A new method for assessing the safety of ships damaged by grounding. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 154(A1), pp.1-20.
  21. Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B., Mansour, A.E. and Caldwell, J.B., 2013. Modified Paik-Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls. Ships and Offshore Structures, 8(3-4), pp.245-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2012.676247
  22. Paik, J.K., Lee, J.M., Hwang, J.S. and Park, Y.I., 2003a. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single/double hull tankers and FSOs/FPSOs. Marine Technology, 40(3), pp.201-217.
  23. Paik, J.K. and Melchers, R.E., 2008. Condition assessment of aged structures. New York: CRC Press.
  24. Paik, J.K., Thayamballi, A.K., Park, Y.I. and Hwang, J.S., 2003b. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for bulk carrier structures. International Journal of Maritime Engineering, 145(A2), pp.61-87.
  25. Paik, J.K., Thayamballi, A.K., Park, Y.I. and Hwang, J.S., 2004. A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for seawater ballast tanks of ships. Corrosion Science, 46(2), pp.471-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00145-8