International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Availability analysis of subsea blowout preventer using Markov model considering demand rate

  • Kim, Sunghee (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, Soyeon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Youngsoon (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Availabilities of subsea Blowout Preventers (BOP) in the Gulf of Mexico Outer Continental Shelf (GoM OCS) is investigated using a Markov method. An updated ${\beta}$ factor model by SINTEF is used for common-cause failures in multiple redundant systems. Coefficient values of failure rates for the Markov model are derived using the ${\beta}$ factor model of the PDS (reliability of computer-based safety systems, Norwegian acronym) method. The blind shear ram preventer system of the subsea BOP components considers a demand rate to reflect reality more. Markov models considering the demand rate for one or two components are introduced. Two data sets are compared at the GoM OCS. The results show that three or four pipe ram preventers give similar availabilities, but redundant blind shear ram preventers or annular preventers enhance the availability of the subsea BOP. Also control systems (PODs) and connectors are contributable components to improve the availability of the subsea BOPs based on sensitivity analysis.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Trade, industry & energy

References

  1. Bukowski, J., 2006. Incorporating process demand into models for assessment of safetysystem performance. Proceedings of RAM'06 Symposium. U.S., CA, 23-26 January 2006, pp.577-581.
  2. Cai, B., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Tian, X., Zhang, Y. and Liu, J., 2012a. Performance evaluation of subsea blowout preventer systems with common-cause failures. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 90-91, pp.18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.04.007
  3. Cai, B., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Tian, X., Li, H. and Ren, C., 2012b. Reliability analysis of subsea blowout preventer control systems subjected to multiple error shocks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 25, pp.1044-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.014
  4. Goble, W.M., 2010. Control systems safety evaluation and reliability. 3rd ed. North Carolina: ISA.
  5. Hauge, S., Lundteigen, M.A., Hokstad, P. and Habrekke, S., 2010. Reliability prediction method for safety instrumented systems PDS method handbook 2010. Norway: SINTEF.
  6. Hokstad, P. and Bodsberq, L., 1989. Reliability model for computerized safety systems. Proceeding of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, U.S. GA, 24-26 January 1989, pp.435-440.
  7. Holand, P., 1999. Reliability of subsea BOP systems for deepwater application, phase II DW, SINTEF Report, STF38 A99426. Norway: SINTEF.
  8. IEC, 1998. IEC 61508 - Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic: safety-related system. Geneva: IEC.
  9. IEC, 2010. IEC 61508 - Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic: safety-related system. Geneva: IEC.
  10. Januarilham, Y., 2012. Analysis of component criticality in the blowout preventer. Master's thesis. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Stavanger, Norway.
  11. Jin, H., Lundteigen, M.A. and Rausand, M., 2011. Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low- and high-demand mode of operation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 96(3), pp.365- 373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.007
  12. Liu, Y. and Rausand, M., 2011. Reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems subject to different demand modes. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 24(1), pp.49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.08.014
  13. Rausand, M. and Høyland, A., 2004. System reliability theory, models, statistical methods, and applications. 2rd edition. John Hoboken, New Jersy: Wiley & Sons.
  14. WEST Engineering Services, 2009. Blow-out prevention equipment reliability joint industry project (Phase I - Subsea), Final report. U.S.: WEST Engineering Services..
  15. Yang, Y.S. and Yoon, J.H., 1991. A study on the fatigue reliability of structures by Markov chain model. Transactions of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 28(2), pp.228-240.