Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Perception of the HACCP system operators on livestock product manufacturers

  • Kim, Jung-Hyun (Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nam, Ki-Chang (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University) ;
  • Jo, Cheorun (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Dong-Gyun (Department of Health Administration and Food Hygiene, Jinju Health College)
  • Received : 2014.04.30
  • Accepted : 2014.07.16
  • Published : 2014.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate crucial factors on HACCP system implementation in domestic livestock product plants, and to offer job satisfaction and the career prospect of HACCP system operators. The survey was carried out by selecting 150 HACCP system operators who implemented HACCP system. The respondents claimed that the most important contents in HACCP system operation were to assemble HACCP team (21.8%), and the second was to monitoring (20.0%). Documentation and recording (16.9%) and verification (11.1%) were followed. The respondents answered the major factor in sanitation management was cleaning/washing/disinfection (18.9%) and inspection (18.4%). The results showed that there were significant differences in the prospect of occupation in HACCP system operator by the gender (p < 0.015), age, livestock product facilities, service period, and position (p < 0.001). The respondents from HACCP system operator were satisfied with their job (73%) and also showed optimistic prospect of occupation (82%).

Keywords

References

  1. Al-Kandari D, Jukes JD: Incorporating HACCP into national food control systems analyzing progress in the United Arab Emirates. Food Control 2011, 22:851-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.013
  2. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC): Recommended international code of practice: General principles of food hygiene; 2003. CAC/RPP 1e1969, Revision 4.
  3. Wallace C, Powell S, Holyoak L: Development of methods for standardized HACCP assessment. Brit Food J 2005, 107(10):723-742. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700510623513
  4. Ropkins K, Beck A: Evaluation of worldwide approaches to the use of HACCP to control food safety. Trends in Food Sci Technol 2000, 11:10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00036-4
  5. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC): Food hygiene basic texts. Codex Alimentarius -Joint FAO/WHO food standards programs. 3rd edition. Lanham, MD: Bernan Association; 2001.
  6. QIA: Animal Plant and Fisheries Quarantine and Inspection Agency. Republic of Korea; 2012. Available: http://www:qia.go.kr/livestock/clean/ livestock_livestock_food.jsp.
  7. Taylor E: HACCP in small companies: benefit or burden. Food Control 2001, 12:217-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(00)00043-8
  8. Holt G: Researcher investigating barriers to the implementation of GHP in SMEs. Personal Communication; 1999. Oct. 1999.
  9. Moon HK, Ryu K: Usage status survey on some essential facilities, equipment and documentary records for HACCP implementation in contract foodservice. J Kor Soc Food Sci Nutr 2004, 33:1162-1168. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2004.33.7.1162
  10. Kim GM, Lee SY: A study on the sanitation management status and barriers to HACCP system implementation of school foodservice institutions in Seoul metropolitan area. J Comm Nutr 2008, 13:405-417.
  11. Park JS, Park SI: A survey of washing and sanitizing methods for the pre-preparation of fruits at a school foodservice in the Seoul and Kyunggi area. Kor J Food Ctr 2009, 24:39-50.
  12. Kwak CK, Kim TK, Park SH, Jang JK: Economic feasibility of HACCP at slaughter plants. Korean J Agr Econ 2002, 29:1-18.
  13. Hong CH, Cho DH: Comparative analysis of the prerequisite items applicable to the HACCP in livestock processing plants. J Food Hygiene Safety 2008, 23:19-25.
  14. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC): Recommended International Code of Practice-General Principles of Food Hygiene; 1997. CAC/RCP 1-1969, Rev.3 and anex.
  15. Panisello PJ, Quantick PC, Knowles MJ: Towards the implementation of HACCP; results of a UK regional survey. Food Control 1999, 10:87-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(98)00161-3
  16. Mortlock MP, Peters AC, Griffith C: Food hygiene and hazard analysis critical control point in the United Kingdom food industry: practices, perceptions and attitudes. J Food Prot 1999, 62:786-792. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-62.7.786
  17. Gormley RT: RTD needs and opinions of European food SMEs. Farm and Food 1995, 5:27-30.
  18. NACMCF: Generic HACCP for raw beef. The national advisory committee on microbiological criteria for food. Food Microbiol 1993, 10:449. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1993.1053
  19. Panisello PJ, Quantick PC: Technical barriers to HACCP. Food Control 2001, 12:165-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(00)00035-9
  20. World Health Organization (WHO): Training Considerations for the Application of the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points System to Food Processing and Manufacturing, WHO Document, WHO/FNU/FOS/93.3, Division of Food and Nutrition. Geneva: WHO; 1993.
  21. Wallace C, Williams T: Pre-requisites: A help or a hindrance to HACCP. Food Control 2001, 12:235-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-7135(00)00042-6
  22. Seward S: Application of HACCP in food service. Irish J Agr Food Res 2000, 39:221-227.
  23. Forsythe SJ, Hayes PR: Food hygiene, microbiology and HACCP. 3rd edition. Maryland: Aspen; 1998.