The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants installed at defect site filled with xenograft material

이종골 이식을 동반한 지르코니아와 타이타늄 임플란트의 골유착에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Sung-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 김성원 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2013.10.25
  • Accepted : 2014.01.03
  • Published : 2014.01.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare zirconia implants with titanium implants from the view point of biomechanical stability and histologic response on osseointegration when those were placed with xenograft materials. Materials and methods: Specimens were divided into two groups; the control group was experimented with eighteen titanium implants which had anodized surface and the experimental group was experimented with eighteen sandblasted zirconia (Y-TZP) implants. At the tibias of six pigs, implants were installed into bone defect sites prepared surgically and treated with resorbable membranes and bovine bone. Two pigs were sacrificed after 1, 4 and 12 weeks respectively. Each implant site was sampled and processed for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. The stability of implants was evaluated with a $Periotest^{(R)}$. And the interfaces between bone and the implant were observed with a scanning electron microscope. Results: In stability analysis there was no significant difference between Periotest values of the control group and the experimental group. In histologic analysis with a light microscope after 4 weeks, there was new bone formation with the resorption of bovine bone and the active synthesis of osteoblasts in both groups. In bone-implant contact percentage there was significant difference between both groups (P<.05). In bone area percentage there was no significant difference between both groups. In analysis of both groups with a scanning electron microscope there was a gap between bone and a surface at 4 weeks and it was filled up with bone formed newly at 12 weeks. Conclusion: When accompanied by xenograft using membrane, bone to implant contact percentage of zirconia implants used in this experiment was significantly less than that of the titanium implants by surface treatment of anodic oxidation. So, it is considered that the improvement of zirconia implant is needed through ongoing research on surface treatment methods for its practical use.

연구 목적: 본 연구에서는 외과적으로 형성한 골 결손부에 이종골 이식과 함께 식립한 지르코니아 임플란트의 골유착에 대한 기계적 안정성과 조직학적 반응을 타이타늄 임플란트와 비교하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 6마리 돼지의 경골에 인위적으로 형성한 골 결손 부위에 대조군인 18개의 상용 타이타늄 나사형 임플란트와 실험군인 18개의 샌드블라스팅한 지르코니아(Y-TZP) 나사형 임플란트를 각각 식립하고 차폐막을 이용하여 이종골을 이식하였으며 1주, 4주, 12주후에 각각 2마리씩 희생시켜 조직 시편을 제작하였다. 식립 직후와 식립 1주, 4주, 12주 후에 각각 페리오테스트를 이용하여 임플란트의 안정성을 측정하였고, 광학현미경으로 조직학적 관찰과 조직계측학적 분석을 하였으며 주사전자현미경으로 임플란트의 표면 특성과 골-임플란트 계면을 관찰하였다. 결과: 페리오테스트를 이용한 임플란트 안정성 분석 결과, 대조군과 실험군 사이에 유의한 차이가 없었고, 조직학적 분석 결과, 각 군 모두 4주에 이식골의 재흡수와 조골세포의 활발한 활동에 의해 신생골이 형성되기 시작하였다. 골-임플란트 접촉률 분석 결과, 대조군과 실험군 사이에 유의한 차이가 있었으며(P<.05), 특히 4주와 12주에서 실험군과 대조군 사이에 2시점에서 유의한 차이를 보였다(P<.05). 골 면적률 분석 결과, 대조군과 실험군 사이에 유의한 차이가 없었다. 주사전자현미경 관찰 결과, 대조군은 균일한 다공성의 거친 표면을 나타냈고 실험군은 무정형 입자들이 불규칙하게 산재된 표면을 보여 주었다. 각 군 모두 4주에 임플란트 표면과 골 조직 사이에 빈 공간이 관찰되었고 12주에는 일부 공간에서 골 조직으로 채워진 양상을 보였다. 결론: 차폐막을 이용한 이종골 이식을 동반하는 경우 본 실험에 사용된 지르코니아 임플란트의 골-임플란트 접촉률은 양극산화 표면처리를 한 타이타늄 임플란트에 크게 미치지 못하므로 지르코니아 임플란트의 실용화를 위해서는 표면 처리 방법 등에 대한 지속적인 연구를 통한 개선이 필요하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  2. Scarano A, Di Carlo F, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:8-12. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0008:BRTZCI>2.3.CO;2
  3. Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1262
  4. Song YS, Cho IH. Surface characteristics and stability of implants treated with alkali and heat. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2008; 46:490-9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2008.46.5.490
  5. Langhoff JD, Voelter K, Scharnweber D, Schnabelrauch M, Schlottig F, Hefti T, Kalchofner K, Nuss K, von Rechenberg B. Comparison of chemically and pharmaceutically modified titanium and zirconia implant surfaces in dentistry: a study in sheep. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:1125-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.09.008
  6. Nyman S. Bone regeneration using the principle of guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:494-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb02322.x
  7. Hammerle CH, Olah AJ, Schmid J, Fluckiger L, Gogolewski S, Winkler JR, Lang NP. The biological effect of natural bone mineral on bone neoformation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:198-207. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080306.x
  8. Lim JH, Lim JH, Lim HS, Cho IH. The effect of various graft materials on the stability of implant and peri-implant tissue response in rabbit tibia. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implantol 2001;5:41-64.
  9. Hammerle CH, Jung RE, Yaman D, Lang NP. Ridge augmentation by applying bioresorbable membranes and deproteinized bovine bone mineral: a report of twelve consecutive cases. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:19-25.
  10. Park C, Lim JH, Cho IH, Lim HS. A study on the measurement of the implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:182-206.
  11. Neugebauer J, Iezzi G, Perrotti V, Fischer JH, Khoury F, Piattelli A, Zoeller JE. Experimental immediate loading of dental implants in conjunction with grafting procedures. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;91:604-12.
  12. Wang S, Liu Y, Fang D, Shi S. The miniature pig: a useful large animal model for dental and orofacial research. Oral Dis 2007; 13:530-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01337.x
  13. Jang ES, Park JW, Kweon H, Lee KG, Kang SW, Baek DH, Choi JY, Kim SG. Restoration of peri-implant defects in immediate implant installations by Choukroun platelet-rich fibrin and silk fibroin powder combination graft. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:831-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.038
  14. Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:351-60.
  15. Schultze-Mosgau S, Schliephake H, Radespiel-Troger M, Neukam FW. Osseointegration of endodontic endosseous cones: zirconium oxide vs titanium. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89:91-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(00)80022-0
  16. Lee SH, Cho IH. Surface characteristics and bioactivity of anodically oxidized titanium surfaces. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45: 85-97.
  17. Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:662-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x
  18. Schliephake H, Hefti T, Schlottig F, Gedet P, Staedt H. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:818-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01549.x
  19. Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, Takeuchi H, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, Ban S. Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater J 2009;28:461-70. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.461
  20. Lincks J, Boyan BD, Blanchard CR, Lohmann CH, Liu Y, Cochran DL, Dean DD, Schwartz Z. Response of MG63 osteoblastlike cells to titanium and titanium alloy is dependent on surface roughness and composition. Biomaterials 1998;19:2219-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00144-6
  21. Nishimoto SK, Nishimoto M, Park SW, Lee KM, Kim HS, Koh JT, Ong JL, Liu Y, Yang Y. The effect of titanium surface roughening on protein absorption, cell attachment, and cell spreading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:675-80.
  22. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:844-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01727.x

Cited by

  1. Influencing factors of satisfaction and revisiting intention of dental implant patients vol.15, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2015.15.06.983