DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Perception Between Secondary School Teacher and Pre-service Teacher about the Creativity as an Essential Quality of Highly Professional and Committed Teachers

헌신적인 교사가 갖추어야 할 창의성에 대한 중등교사와 예비교사의 인식 비교

  • Received : 2014.10.30
  • Accepted : 2014.12.30
  • Published : 2014.12.30

Abstract

In order to foster 'creative convergence talents' teachers and pre-service teachers who possess a certain degree of creativity must learn about this new approach as part of their teacher training. In this study, we attempted to identify the implications on the curriculum of the teacher education-training college in question by analysing secondary school teachers' and pre-service teachers' creativity and by collecting sufficient data to develop a positive feedback model for selecting, cultivating, and appointing pre-service teachers who fulfil the requirements of said college of education. Such teachers will display the commitment and professionalism to fulfil their teaching duties in the best possible manner and will consistently produce valuable contributions to their chosen subject matter and integrate these into their daily teaching. These teachers will complete all their tasks in a creative way, including student guidance, administrative duties, and academic lessons. The factors that distinguished creative teachers from others included originality and fluency. Our test group comprised 216 pre-service teachers as well as 137 fully qualified teachers. Teachers' understanding of the factors required in order to qualify as a 'creative and committed teacher' was very low. We provided data to the college of education to increase creativity when selecting teachers and curricula based on an analysis of perceptions of creativity provided by teachers and pre-service teachers.

Keywords

References

  1. Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  2. Apedoe, X., Reynolds, B., Ellefson, M., & Schunn, C. (2008). Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 454-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9114-6
  3. Chang, In-hee(2012). A study on the concept of creativity by elementary school teachers in Korea. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 11(2), 103-128.
  4. Cho, Youn-soon, Choi, Kyou-lee, & Cho, Young-eun (2012). Characteristics of student creativity and the teacher's role observed by pre-service elementary teachers. The Research of Education and Science, 43(4), 137-164.
  5. Choi Hae-kyeong & Kim Yong-gwon(2013). The effects of application of creative thinking technique for development on creativity and attitude toward science. Journal of Korean Earth Science Education, 6(3), 221-234.
  6. Ellis, S. & Lawrence, B. (2009). The influence of the creative learning assessment(CLA) on children's learning and teachers' teaching. Literacy, 43(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2009.00509.x
  7. Esquivel, G. B. (1995). Teacher behaviors that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212493
  8. Fairweather, E. & Cramon, B. (2010). Infusing creative and critical thinking into the curriculum together. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Fleith, D. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554022
  10. Guilford, J. P. (1975). Traits of creativity. New York: Penguin.
  11. Hah Ju-hyun & Cho In-jin(2007). The common characteristic of creativity: the polarity. The Journal of the Korean Society for the Gifted and Talented, 6(1), 127-146.
  12. Kim Soon-nam & Hwang Hyang-sook(2006). Teacher' self-evaluation on teaching behavior for fostering creativity. The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 5(2). 1-24.
  13. Kong, L. & O'Connor, J. (2009). Creative economies, creative cities. Heidelberg: Springer.
  14. KEDI(2007). The study on the characteristics of the highly professional committed teachers in Korea. Korean Educational Development Institute, RR2007-8.
  15. Mildrum, N. K. (2000). Creativity workshops in the regular classroom. Roeper Review, 22(3), 162-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554025
  16. Millar, A. I. (1996). Metaphors in creative scientific thought. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.1996.9651167
  17. Ministry of Education and Science Technology(2009). Korean 2009 revision science curriculum. Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
  18. Ministry of Education and Science Technology(2011). 2011 Agenda report: the education of a creative convergence talents and advanced technology in the republic of Korea. MEST.
  19. Park, Jong-won(2004). A suggestion of cognitive model of scientific creativity(CMSC). Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(2), 375-386.
  20. Peters, M. A. & Araya D. (2010). The creative economy: origins, categories, and concepts. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
  21. Rothenberg, A. (1996). The janusian process in scientific creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.1996.9651173
  22. Runco, M. A. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity. New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  23. Smith, J. K. & Smith, L. F. (2010). Educational creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Sternberg, R. J. (2010). Teaching for creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  25. UNCTAD(2008). World Investment Report. New York: UN.
  26. Urban, K. K. (1995). Creativity - a component approach model, a paper presented at the 11th world conference on the education for the gifted and talented. Hong Kong.
  27. Yoon, Ma-byong(2014). The case study of topophilia's role as a motivator to learn and an analysis of educational resources. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(4), 467-479.

Cited by

  1. The Application of Science Education Lecture for Pre-Service Teacher Using Teaching-Learning Method Based on Flipped Learning vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0499