Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Improving Access & Retrieval System of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings

국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 검색 시스템 개선 방안에 관한 연구

  • 백지원 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 정연경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2014.01.27
  • Accepted : 2014.03.10
  • Published : 2014.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to suggest several improvement strategies for the access and retrieval system of National Library of Korea Subject Headings (NLKSH). For this purpose, first of all, the access and retrieval systems in five selected subject headings were examined. Second, focus group interviews and system analysis were conducted to reveal the current condition and suggest the future development strategies. Third, IFLA's Guidelines for Subject Access in National Bibliographies and FAST application cases were analyzed to suggest implications on the improvement strategies. Upon these analysis, recommendations for improving access and retrieval systems of the NLKSH were proposed in four areas as follows: functionalities, interfaces, queries, and other front-end features.

본 연구의 목적은 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표의 이용자 접근 및 검색 시스템 기능 개선 방안을 제안하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 첫째, 국내외 주요 주제명표목표의 주제명 접근 및 검색 방식을 분석하여 시사점을 도출하였다. 둘째, 포커스 그룹 인터뷰와 검색 시스템 분석을 통해 주제명 접근, 이용 방식과 절차 등 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표의 이용 현황 및 검색 시스템의 문제점을 파악하였다. 셋째, IFLA의 국가 서지 주제 접근 지침과 FAST의 적용 사례에 나타난 주제 접근 도구의 발전 방향 및 국내외 사례의 시사점 등을 바탕으로 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표의 검색 시스템 개선안을 기능, 인터페이스, 질의, 부가 서비스 등 4가지 부문으로 나누어 제안하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립중앙도서관 (2002). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 개발 최종보고서. 서울: 국립중앙도서관.(National Library of Korea (2002). Development of National Library of Korea Subject Headings. Final report. Seoul: National Library of Korea.)
  2. 국립중앙도서관 (2013). 국립중앙도서관 주제명표목표 개방을 위한 고품질화 연구. 서울: 국립중앙도서관.(National Library of Korea (2013). A study on improvement for data sharing of Korean National Subject Headings. Seoul: National Library of Korea.)
  3. 박지영 (2010). 시소러스를 연계한 문학류 패싯 분류체계 개발. 한국비블리아학회지, 21(3), 77-89.(Park, Zi-Young (2010). Developing a faceted classification scheme integrated with a thesaurus for literature. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 21(3), 77-89.)
  4. 박지영 (2011). 서지레코드의 주제전거를 위한 FRSAD 모형 연구. 정보관리연구, 42(1), 113-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.113(Park, Zi-Young (2011). A study on the Functional Requirement of Subject Authority Data for subject authority control. Journal of Information Management, 42(1), 113-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.1.113)
  5. Anderson, J., & Hofmann, M. (2006). A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 43(1), 7-38. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v43n01_03
  6. Chan, L. M., & O'Neill, E. T. (2010). FAST, Faceted Application of Subject Terminology: Principles and applications. Santa Barbara, Calif.: Libraries Unlimited.
  7. Dean, R. J. (2004). FAST: Development of simplified headings for metadata. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 39(1-2), 331-352. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v39n01_03
  8. Fischer, K. S. (2005). Critical views of LCSH, 1990-2001: The third bibliographic essay. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1), 63-109. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_05
  9. GETAssoc Homepage. 2013. Retrieved from http://getassoc.cs.nii.ac.jp/
  10. Guo, J., & Huang, J. (2011). Subject headings and subject search: A comparative study. Chinese Librarianship: An International Electronic Journal, 31, 1-17.
  11. Jahns, Y. (Ed.) (2012). Guidelines for subject access in national bibliographies. IFLA Series on Bibliographic Control 45. Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Saur.
  12. Jin, Q. (2008). Is FAST the right direction for a new system of subject cataloging and metadata? Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(3), 91-10. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v45n03_08
  13. Julien, C., Guastavino, C., & Bouthillier, F. (2012). Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue. Library Trends, 61, 148-161.
  14. Karen, M. D., Simcox, S., & Williams, M. (1999). Do librarians understand the subject headings in library catalogs? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 38(4), 369-387.
  15. Mixter, J., & Childress, E. (2013). FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) users summary and case studies. Dublin, Ohio: OCLC Research. Retrieved from http://oclc.org/content/dam/research/publications/library/2013/2013-04.pdf
  16. Walsh, J. (2011). The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections. Library Review, 60(4), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111127875
  17. Yi, K., & Chan, L. M. (2010). Revisiting the syntactical and structural analysis of Library of Congress Subject Headings for the digital environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 677-687.

Cited by

  1. A Study on Varieties of Subject Access and Usabilities of the National Library of Korea Subject Headings vol.25, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.4.171