DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Experimental Study for GFRP Reinforced Concrete Beams without Stirrups

스터럽이 없는 GFRP 보강근 콘크리트 보에 대한 실험적 연구

  • 고성현 (제주국제대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2013.07.16
  • Accepted : 2013.10.18
  • Published : 2014.03.30

Abstract

This paper evaluates the shear strength, behavior and failure mode of reinforced concrete beams with deformed GFRP reinforcing bar. Four concrete beam specimens were constructed and tested. It was carried out to observe failure behavior and load-deflection of simply supported concrete beams subjected to four-point monotonic loading. In order to eliminate of the uncertainty by the shear reinforcements, any stirrups were not used. Variables of the specimens were shear span-depth ratio, effective reinforcement ratio. The dimensions of specimen is 3,300 or $1,950mm{\times}200mm{\times}240mm$. Clear span and shear span were 2,900mm, 1,000mm respectively. Shear span-depth ratios were 6.5 and 2.5. Effective ratios of Longitudinal GFRP reinforcing bar were $1.126{\rho}_{fb}$, $2.250{\rho}_{fb}$, $3.375{\rho}_{fb}$ and $0.634{\rho}_{fb}$. All beam specimens were broken by diagonal-tension shear and the ACI 440.1R, CSA S806 and ISIS, which was used to design test beams, showed considerable deviation between prediction and test results of shear strengths.

본 연구에서는 GFRP 이형 보강근으로 휨보강된 보의 거동, 파괴유형과 강도를 평가하였다. 4개의 보 실험체들을 제작하여 실험을 수행하였다. 4점 하중재하 조건으로 단순지지된 GFRP로 보강 콘크리트 실험체의 거동과 하중-처짐을 관찰하였다. 전단배근으로 인한 거동의 불확실성을 배제하기 위하여 스터럽을 배근하지 않고 실험체를 제작하였다. 실험 변수는 전단지간비와 유효보강비이다. 실험체의 길이는 3,300 또는 $1,950mm{\times}200mm{\times}240mm$이고 순지간 2,900 또는 1,000mm이다. 전단지간비는 6.5와 2.5이며, GFRP 유효 보강근비는 $1.126{\rho}_{fb}$, $2.250{\rho}_{fb}$, $3.375{\rho}_{fb}$$0.634{\rho}_{fb}$이다. 실험 결과 모든 실험체는 전단파괴 되었으며 실험계획에 적용한 ACI 440.1R, CSA S806와 ISIS의 전단 강도식이 실제와 편차가 있음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI Committee 440 (2006), Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with FRP Bars (ACI 440.1R-06), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 1-44.
  2. Anronio D. L., Fabio Matta, and Antonio Nanni (2010), Behavior of full-scale glass fiber-reinforced polymer reinforced concrete columns under axial load, ACI Structural journal, 107(5), 589-596.
  3. Canadian Standard Association (2002), Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre-Reinforced Polymers (CSA S806-02), Rexdale, Ontario, Canada, 1-177.
  4. CNR-DT 203 (2007), Guide for the Design and construction of concrete structures reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer bars, Rome, Italy (in Italian).
  5. Egyptian Code Committee (2005), The Egyptian Code for the use of fiber reinforced polymer bars (FRP) in the construction field (In Arabic).
  6. IGDRCS (1999), Interim Guidance on the Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Fibre Composite Reinforcement, The Institution of Structural Engineers, 1-116.
  7. ISIS Canada (2007), Reinforcing Concrete Structures with Fibre Reinforced Polymers (ISIS-MO3-01), ISIS Canada Corporation, Winnipeg, Manitoba, 1-81.
  8. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (1997), Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials. Research Committee on Continuous Fiber Reinforced Materials, Concrete Engineering Series 23, Machida, A., ed. Tokyo, Japan (in Japanese).
  9. Jin, M. H., Kim, C. H., Son, B. L., Lee, S., and Jang, H. S. (2009), Concrete shear strength of lightweight concrete beam reinforced with FRP bar, Journal of Korea Concrete Institute, 21(2), 235-241 (in Korean).
  10. Kim, J. Y., Kim, M. G., Kim, C. H., Jang, H. S. (2007), Concrete shear strength of concrete beam reinforced with GFRP bar according to variation of the shear span to depth and flexural reinforcement ratio, Proc. of Korea Concrete Institute, 113-116 (in Korean).
  11. Korea Institute Construction Technology (2005), Design and Construction Technology for Concrete Structures Using Advanced Composite Materials, Report, 1-617 (in Korean).
  12. Matta, F., Nanni, A., Hernandez, T. M., and Benmokrane, M. (2008), Scaling of strength of FRP reinforced concrete beams without shear reinforcement, Fourth international conference on FRP composites in civil engineering (CICE2008) Zurich, Switzerland, July, 1-6.
  13. Nanni, A. (1993), Flexural behavior and design of rc members using FRP reinforcement, ASCE Journal of str. Engr., 119(11), 3344-3359. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:11(3344)
  14. Noh, K. B., Jin, C. S., Jang, H. S., Kim, H. S., Hwang, G. S. (2005), Concrete shear strength of FRP bar reinforced concrete beam according to variation of flexural reinforcement ratio, Proc. of 31th KSCE, 1211-1214 (in Korean).
  15. Park, J. S., Park, Y. H., You, Y. J. (2008), Experimental Study for Shear Strength of Fiber-Reinforced-Polymer Reinforced Concrete Beams, Proc. of Korea Concrete Institute, 57-60 (in Korean).
  16. Rostasy, F. S. (1996), FRP: The European perpective Fiber Composites in Infrastructure, 1st Conf. in Infrastructure, 12-20.
  17. You, Y. J., Kim, J. H., Park, Y. H., Park, J. S. (2012), Enhancements in Performance and Manufacturing Efficiencies of GFRP Rebar, Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, KSMI, 16(1), 110-119 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2012.16.1.110