The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique

  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2013.07.08
  • Accepted : 2013.08.19
  • Published : 2014.03.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and precision of polyurethane (PUT) dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional (3D) subtractive rapid prototyping (RP) method with an intraoral scanning technique by comparing linear measurements obtained from PUT models and conventional plaster models. Methods: Ten plaster models were duplicated using a selected standard master model and conventional impression, and 10 PUT models were duplicated using the 3D subtractive RP technique with an oral scanner. Six linear measurements were evaluated in terms of x, y, and z-axes using a non-contact white light scanner. Accuracy was assessed using mean differences between two measurements, and precision was examined using four quantitative methods and the Bland-Altman graphical method. Repeatability was evaluated in terms of intra-examiner variability, and reproducibility was assessed in terms of interexaminer and inter-method variability. Results: The mean difference between plaster models and PUT models ranged from 0.07 mm to 0.33 mm. Relative measurement errors ranged from 2.2% to 7.6% and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.93 to 0.96, when comparing plaster models and PUT models. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement. Conclusions: The accuracy and precision of PUT dental models for evaluating the performance of oral scanner and subtractive RP technology was acceptable. Because of the recent improvements in block material and computerized numeric control milling machines, the subtractive RP method may be a good choice for dental arch models.

Keywords

References

  1. Henkel S. A better first impression: manufacturing dental restorations using impressions. J Dent Technology 2008;13-6.
  2. Jones P. The iTero optical scanner for use with Invisalign: A descriptive review. Dent Implantol Update2008;19:1-4.
  3. Barker TM, Earwaker WJ, Lisle DA. Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy. Australas Radiol 1994;38:106-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.1994.tb00146.x
  4. Kragskov J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Gyldensted C, Jensen KL. A comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography scans and stereolithographic models for evaluation of craniofacial anomalies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:402-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90109-3
  5. Cuperus AM, Harms MC, Rangel FA, Bronkhorst EM, Schols JG, Breuning KH. Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:308-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.03.031
  6. Lill W, Solar P, Ulm C, Watzek G, Blahout R, Matejka M. Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:233-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(92)90265-K
  7. Santoro M, Galkin S, Teredesai M, Nicolay OF, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:101-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00152-5
  8. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.
  9. Zilberman O, Huggare JA, Parikakis KA. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod2003;73:301-6.
  10. Stevens DR, Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Raboud DW, Heo G, Major PW. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:794-803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.08.023
  11. Watanabe-Kanno GA, Abrão J, Miasiro Junior H, Sánchez-Ayala A, Lagravère MO. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:288-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
  12. Leifert MF, Leifert MM, Efstratiadis SS, Cangialosi TJ. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:16.e1-4.
  13. Mullen SR, Martin CA, Ngan P, Gladwin M. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:346-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.044
  14. Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008;35:191-201. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022626
  15. Creed B, Kau CH, English JD, Xia JJ, Lee RP. A comparison of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained from cone beam computerized tomography images and digital models. Semin Orthod 2011;17:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2010.08.010
  16. Alcan T, Ceylanoğlu C, Baysal B. The relationship between digital model accuracy and time-dependent deformation of alginate impressions. Angle Orthod 2009;79:30-6. https://doi.org/10.2319/100307-475.1
  17. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.; 1940. p. 122-32.
  18. Henriksen M, Lund H, Moe-Nilssen R, Bliddal H, Danneskiod-Samsøe B. Test-retest reliability of trunk accelerometric gait analysis. Gait Posture 2004;19:288-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00069-9
  19. Bland JM. Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
  20. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1986.p.76-8.
  21. BeGole EA. Statistics for the orthodontist. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 339-52.
  22. Dalstra M, Melsen B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod 2009;36:36-41. https://doi.org/10.1179/14653120722905
  23. Mok KH, Cooke MS. Space analysis: a comparison between sonic digitization (DigiGraph Workstation) and the digital caliper. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:653-61.
  24. Asquith J, Gillgrass T, Mossey P. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study. Eur J Orthod 2007;29:517-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm044
  25. Linnet K. Limitations of the paired t-test for evaluation of method comparison data. Clin Chem 1999;45:314-5.
  26. Donatelli RE, Lee SJ. How to report reliability in orthodontic research: Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:156-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.03.014
  27. Reich S, Uhlen S, Gozdowski S, Lohbauer U. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15:521-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0414-x
  28. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:494, 496,498-505.
  29. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, Voy ED, Günther RW. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:458-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013512
  30. Petrzelka JE, Frank MC. Advanced process planning for subtractive rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping J 2010;16:216-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541011034898

Cited by

  1. 세 가지 방식의 스캐너 종류에 따른 모형 정확도 평가 vol.15, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2015.15.2.226
  2. 구강스캐너를 이용한 임플란트 보철물 제작 증례 vol.53, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2015.53.3.256
  3. Reliability and validity of intraoral and extraoral scanners vol.16, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0108-7
  4. 구강 내 스캐너와 구강 외 스캐너를 사용하여 취득된 스캔 데이터 정확도 비교 vol.37, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2015.37.4.191
  5. Quality of Lab Appliances in Orthodontic Offices vol.40, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.6.506
  6. CAD/CAM 밀링 시스템을 활용한 단일 치관과 3본 교의치의 3D 적합도 평가 vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2017.39.1.35
  7. Biodegradable polymers in dental tissue engineering and regeneration vol.5, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1073
  8. An approach for dental prosthesis design and manufacturing through rapid manufacturing technologies vol.32, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2019.1636410
  9. 디지털 치과모형의 정확도 평가 방법에 대한 고찰 vol.35, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.2.55
  10. 비접촉식 구강외 스캐너와 비디오방식 구강내 스캐너를 이용하여 제작된 보철물의 내면정확도 비교 vol.41, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14347/kadt.2019.41.4.263
  11. Accuracy of digital light processing printing of 3-dimensional dental models vol.157, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.012
  12. Linear Accuracy of Full-Arch Digital Models Using Four Different Scanning Methods: An In Vitro Study Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine vol.10, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082741
  13. The Modern and Digital Transformation of Oral Health Care: A Mini Review vol.9, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020118
  14. Effect of Die Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Copings: An In Vitro Study vol.15, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010708