DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Economic Value for Construction of Ecological Stream in Hong Cheon Area, Korea

홍천강 생태하천 복원사업의 경제적 가치

  • 구윤모 (서울대학교 협동과정 기술경영경제정책과정) ;
  • 강형식 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 이미숙 (한국환경정책.평가연구원)
  • Received : 2013.09.22
  • Accepted : 2014.02.27
  • Published : 2014.02.28

Abstract

The goal of this study is to estimate economic benefit of restoring ecological stream of Hong Cheon river. The benefit is determined by estimating willingness-to-pay for the value of Hong Cheon river because it is a non-market good which is difficult to be measured in terms of monetary value. Specifically, the spike model, one of the contingent valuation methods, is used to distinguish respondents having zero willingness-to-pay for Hong Cheon river. The results show that a household located near the Hong Cheon river is willing to pay 3,300~4,628 Korean Won per year, while a household not located near the Hong Cheon river is willing to pay 1,308~2,929 Korean Won per year. Thus, total benefit of restoring ecological stream of Hong Cheon river is estimated as 97.6~216.3 billion Korean Won.

본 연구는 최근 홍천강의 생태적 기능을 되살리기 위해 계획 중인 생태하천 복원사업의 경제적 편익을 정량적으로 추정하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 생태하천 복원사업의 결과물은 시장에서 거래되는 재화가 아니기 때문에 가격을 이용한 가치 측정에 어려움이 있으므로, 사용가치 및 비사용가치에 대한 지불의사액을 분석하는 조건부 가치측정법을 적용하였다. 또한 지불의사액이 0인 응답자들을 고려한 스파이크 모형을 추가적으로 이용하였다. 분석 결과 사업지 인근에서는 가구당 연간 3,300원~4,628원, 비사업지에서는 가구당 연간 1,308원~2,929원의 지불의사가 있었다. 이를 우리나라 전체로 확대할 경우, 홍천강 생태하천 복원사업의 경제적 편익은 현재가치로 약 976억 원~2,163억 원에 이를 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Eom, Y.S.(2001) Empirical evidence on scope effects in contingent valuation of water quality improvement in Man Kyoung River. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 10(3): 387-412. (in Korean with English abstract)
  2. Eom, Y.S., C.Y. Kim, and T.H. Yoo(2001) Valuing intentions to visit Man Kyoung Ecological River. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 9(1): 91-100. (in Korean with English abstract)
  3. Han, S.Y., K. Choi and J.H. Lee(1997) Nonuse value of forest recreation resources: Empirical evidence and valuation. Korean Journal of Forest Economics 5(2): 1-11. (in Korean with English abstract)
  4. Holmes, T.P., J.C. Bergstrom, E. Huszar, S.B. Kask and F. Orr(2004) Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration. Ecological Economics 49: 19-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.015
  5. Kang, K.(2010) Comparative study on monetary estimates of the preservation value of recreational forests through contingent valuation methods. Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture 99(6): 900-907. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Kang, K.R., K.C. Lee, H.T. Lee, B.R. Ryu and D.P. Kim(2011) A study on economic value of Daegu arboretum based on contingent valuation method. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 25(5): 787-798. (in Korean with English abstract)
  7. Kim, J.H.(2009) Economic valuation of the river water quality improvement in the River Taehwa: an application of a contingent valuation method with multiple choices. The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies 13(2): 137-154. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Kim, J.H.(2001) Benefit estimation of tap water quality improvement based on citizens' willingness-to-pay. Korean Policy Studies Review 10(3): 245-262. (in Korean with English abstract)
  9. Korean Statistical Information Service(2013) Statistics Korea. Available from: http://kosis.kr/eng/
  10. Kristrom, B.(1997) Spike models in contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3): 1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/1244440
  11. Kwon, O.S., J.Y. Choi, W.B. Kim, D.H. An and J.B. Im(2009) Valuing environmental benefits of an environmentally friendly farming complex: the case of Paldang Clean Agricultural Belt. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(1): 33-56. (in Korean with English abstract)
  12. Lee, C.K, Y.G. Kim, Y.S. Kim and S.Y. Han(2001) Valuation of national parks by types of resources: application of contingent valuation method. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 15(1): 79-91. (in Korean with English abstract)
  13. Lee, J.S., S.H. Yoo and S.H. Lim(2009) Measuring the willingness to pay for the creative cultural city project in Seoul. Korean Journal of Public Finance 2(4): 1-28. (in Korean with English abstract)
  14. Lee, S.(2002) An empirical study on the environmental facilities management utilizing the water quality improvement value. The Korea Spatial Planning Review 34: 45-60. (in Korean with English abstract)
  15. Leem, Y.T. and J.Y. Lee(2005) An estimation of the value of urban ecological riverside park. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association 41(9): 95-110. (in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Loomis, J., P. Kent, L. Strange, K. Fausch and A. Covich(2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics 33: 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00131-7
  17. Park, W.S.(2010) A study on non-use valuation of recreation forest in the nature conservation zone. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Society 28(1): 151-173. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Rhee, H.C., H.S. Cung and T.Y. Kim(2004) Valuation of air quality in the metropolitan Seoul. Environmental and Resource Economics Review 13(3): 387-415. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Vo, Q.T., C. Kuenzer, Q.M. Vo, F. Moder and N. Oppelt(2012) Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators 23: 431-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.022
  20. Yang, C.Y., J.S. Lee and S.H. Yoo(2010) Measuring the economic value of the Pungnap Castle restoration project. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 26(3): 63-80. (in Korean with English abstract)
  21. Yoo, S.H. and P. Hong(2007) Using a model of correcting missing response observations to measure the economic benefits of the tap water quality improvement in Seoul. Seoul Studies 8(1): 41-54. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Yoo, S.H., J.H. Han and S.H. Park(2009) The economic benefits from restoring the ecological integrity of the Anseong river. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 25(1): 51-74. (in Korean with English abstract)