DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Students' Perceptions after Application of a Subject Substitute STEAM Program - Focusing on Energy Unit in 6th Grade Curriculum -

교과대체형 STEAM(융합인재교육) 프로그램 개발 및 적용 후 학생들의 인식 분석 - 6학년 에너지 관련 단원을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2013.12.03
  • Accepted : 2014.02.27
  • Published : 2014.04.30

Abstract

In recent years, Korea encourages teachers to do STEAM education(Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts & Mathematics), which includes Arts to STEM education to train creative science technology talent. Related to this, we developed a subject substitute STEAM program for the 6th grade students in elementary school and applied it in a field. The STEAM program which substitutes contents in curriculum related to Energy unit was developed and it was taught to twenty four sixth grade students during regular classes. During the classes, all activities of students were observed and they were written in recording notes during the observation. After all STEAM program ended, how students recognize the subject substitute STEAM program compared to general class, understand learning contents and think about the program before and after the STEAM classes were analyzed through questionnaire and interviews. The results were as follows. First, some students had difficulty in reconciling different ideas in group, creative thinking and crafts but most students liked the STEAM classes because many activities are fun and it is easy to understand. Second, learners regarded practical use of knowledge, learning different subjects together and interests as the reasons they can understand learning contents easily during STEAM program. Third, learners recognized STEAM classes are good to understand knowledge, think creative ideas and improve social skills after the STEAM classes while they showed anticipation, worry and fear before taking the classes. It is found that a subjective substitute STEAM program is helpful to increase learners' interests in learning, understand learning contents, increase creativity and have a good personality through a qualitative research.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn Jae-hong & Kwon Nan-joo(2012). Investigation on the Feasibility and Teachers" Perception in the STEAM Program Development and Application. The bulletin of Science Education, 25(1), 83-89.
  2. Banning, J. & Folkestad, J. E(2012). STEM Education Related Dissertation Abstracts: A Bounded Qualitative Meta-study. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 21(6), 730-741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9361-9
  3. Basham, J.D. & Marino, M,T(2010). Shaping STEM Education for All Students. JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY, 25(3), 1-2.
  4. Cho Hyang-suk(2012). Policy, Research and Practice of STEAM. STEAM Symposium, 13-28.
  5. Cho Soo-hyun & Park Chang-un(2013). The Analysis on Degree of Concerns for STEAM Education of Elementary School Teacher. The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 25(3), 745-755.
  6. Choi Yu-hyun, Moon Dae-young, Kang Kyoung-kyoon, Lee Jin-woo & Lee Joo-ho (2008). The Development and the Effect of Educational Program Based on STEM for the Inventively Gifted. Korean Technology Education Association, 8(2), 143-164.
  7. Georgette Yakman. & Lee-Hyon-yong(2012). Exploring the Exemplary STEAM Education in the U.S. as a Practical Educational Framework for Korea. The Korean Association for Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.6.1072
  8. Geum Young-choong & Bae Seon-a(2012). The Recognition and Needs of Elementary School Teachers about STEAM Education . Korean Institute of Industrial Education, 37(2), 57-75.
  9. Glawer-Zikude, M., Marying, P. & Von Rhoeneck, C.(2003). An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning physics interaction. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210163233
  10. Han Hye-sook & Lee Hwa-jeong(2012). A Study on the Teachers' Perceptions and Needs of STEAM Education. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(3), 573-603.
  11. Hong Seong-woo(2013). Gifted Resource Teachers' Perceptions of STEAM and Effect of Gifted Education Program-Focused on elementary school science gifted education-. Korea University The Graduate School of Education, Master's dissertation.
  12. Jeollabukdo Institute of Science Education(2013). STEAM basic training material.
  13. Jeong Sang-yun(2013). The development and application of 'Earth & Moon' unit from the STEAM Teaching-Learning Program for Scientifically Gifted Elementary Students. The Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Master's dissertation.
  14. Kim Bang-hee, Lee Hee-jin & Kim Jin-soo (2012). Development of T-STEAM Program in Middle School Technology Subject and Its Application. Korean Technology Education Association, 13(1), 131-151.
  15. Kim Jeong-a, Kim Byeong-su, Lee Ji-hwon & Kim Jong-hoon(2011). A Study of Teaching-Learning Methods for the IT-Based STEAM Education Model With Regards to Developing People of Interdisciplinary Abilities. The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education, 23(3). 445-460.
  16. Kim Jin-soo(2007). Exploration of STEM Education as a New Integrated Education for Technology Education. Korean Technology Education Association, 7(3), 1-29.
  17. Kim Jin-soo(2011). A cubic model for STEAM education. Korean Technology Education Association, 11(2), 124-139.
  18. Kim Woo-jin(2012). STEAM Program Development and Application for Improving Creativity of the Gifted Elementary Student about Math : Focused on 4DFrame Teaching Aid Activity. The Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Master's dissertation.
  19. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity(2010). STEAM outline and teaching model development research.
  20. Lee Sang-gyun & Lee Ha-lyong(2013). The Effects and Development of Project-Based STEAM Program. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(1), 78-86.
  21. Lee Seung-woo, Baek Jong-il & Lee Jeong-gon(2013). The Development and the Effects of Educational Program applied on STEAM for the Mathematical Prodigy. The Korean Society of Mathematical Education, 16(1), 35-55. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2013.16.1.035
  22. Merrill, C. & Daugherty, J(2010). STEM Education and Leadership: A Mathematics and Science Partnership Approach. Journal of Technology Education, 21(2), 21-34.
  23. Moore, J.W(2007). Critical Needs of STEM Education. Journal of chemical education.
  24. Oh Jung-cheol, Lee Ji-hwon, Kim Jung-a & Kim Jong-hoon(2012). Development and Application of STEAM based Education Program Using Scratch -Focus on 6th Graders' Science in Elementary School. Korean association of computer education, 15(3), 11-23.
  25. Reiss, M & Holman(2007). S-T-E-M working together for schools and colleges, 1-8, The Royal Society.
  26. Seo Ju-hee(2012). Effects of STEAM Program Development and Application for the Lower Grades of Elementary School. Graduate school of Education Gyeongin National University of Education, Master's dissertation.
  27. Seo Ju-hee & Shin Young-joon(2012). Effects of STEAM Program Development and Application for the Lower Grades of Elementary School. The bulletin of Science Education, 26(1), 1-14.
  28. Shin Dong-hee(2011). Smart Convergence and Consilience 3,0. Seoul: Sungkyunkwan Publishing Department.
  29. Shin Jae-han(2013). Survey of Primary & Secondary school teachers' recognition about STEAM convergence education. The Korean Association for Science Education, 7(2), 29-53.
  30. Shin Young-joon & Han Seon-kwan(2011). A Study of the Elementary School Teachers' Perception in STEAM Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) Education. Elementary science education, 30(4), 9-20.
  31. The Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development(2009). Elementary and Secondary school Curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 of The Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development.
  32. The Ministry of Education Science and Technology(2011). 2009 Revised Curriculum . Notification No. 2011-361 of The Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
  33. The Ministry of Education Science and Technology(2010). Future Korea of Advanced Science technology and Creative Talent. 2011 task report.
  34. The Ministry of Education Science and Technology(2012). STEAM Action Plan. The Ministry of Education Science and Technology.
  35. Yakman, G. & Kim Jin-soo(2007). Using BADUK to teach purposefully integrated STEM/STEAM Education. 37th Annual Conference International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning, Atlanta, Georgia, (Oct. 11-13, 2007).

Cited by

  1. Impact of Science Club Activities Associated with STEAM Activities on Students' Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Science vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2015.8.2.183