DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Difficulties Experienced by Pre-service Elementary School Teachers in Carrying out a Research on 'the Life Cycle of a Common Cabbage Butterfly'

초등 예비교사들이 '배추흰나비 한살이' 탐구 수행과정에서 겪는 어려움

  • Received : 2014.02.19
  • Accepted : 2014.04.25
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

This study aims to analyze difficulties that pre-service elementary teachers experience in investigating the life cycle of a common cabbage butterfly in person. As difficulties they face during the process of this research, they pointed out collecting eggs, observing molting, creating environments for a breeding cage, feeding, building a breeding cage, and making butterfly specimens. Out of all the environmental difficulties related to their school fields, they pointed out a difficulty of time management most of all, followed by placing a breeding cage in the classroom and the lack of microscopes for observation. In regard to difficulties related to their evaluations on students' activities, they found it difficult to evaluate students' activity with the life cycle of an insect in the aspect of knowledge and even to set evaluation criteria. Besides, many of them responded that it would be appropriate to evaluate a research on the life cycle of an insect through a portfolio or an observation journal. In regard to difficulties in terms of teachers' knowledge, they found it difficult to understand insect molting, metamorphoses, complete metamorphoses, incomplete metamorphoses, the structure of an insect body, and how to distinguish a female insect from a male one. In regard to the application of class models, they knew it is important for students to have various experiences through direct observation, so the experience-based learning model was proper for the process of observing the life cycle of a common cabbage butterfly. However, they found it difficult for students to observe each stage of the life cycle in person.

Keywords

References

  1. Barrow, L. H. (2002). What do elementary students know about insects?. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 5-56.
  2. Choi, D., Kim, M., Kim, J., Kim, S., Song, P. & Han, K. (2004). An analysis of the gearning materials in the elementary school science according to the 7th curriculum. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(4), 305-317.
  3. Cinici, A. (2013). From caterpillar to butterfly: A window for looking into students' ideas about life cycle and life forms of insects. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.773361
  4. Czerniak, C. M. & Haney, J. J. (1998). The effect of collaborative concept mapping on elementary preservice teachers' anxiety, efficacy, and achievement in physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(4), 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009431400397
  5. Czerniak, C. M. & Schriver, M. L. (1994). An examination of pre-service science teachers' beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02614577
  6. Dalgety, J. & Coll, R., K. (2005). Students' perceptions and learning experiences of Tertiary-Level chemistry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 5(1), 61-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150509556644
  7. Davis, K. S. (2002). Change is hard: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education Journal, 87(1), 3-30.
  8. Garcia, C. (2003). The effect of teacher atitutude experience, and background knowledge on the use of inquiry method teaching in the elementary classroom. In partial fulfillment of the requirements in SCE 5308.
  9. Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loghran, J. & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or Can students learn something from doing experiment?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200009)37:7<655::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-E
  10. Haury, D. L. & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of handson science teaching. (ERIC, Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.) Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.ericse.org/digests/dse93-8.html
  11. Jurisevic, M., Glazer, S. A., Pucko, C. R. & Devetak, I. (2008). Intrinsic motivation of pre-service primary school teachers for learning chemistry in relation to their academic achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 87-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601148517
  12. Kim, H., Bae, J. & So, K. (2013). A study of elementary students' cognition and attitude about insects. Biology Education, 41(1), 61-74. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.1.61
  13. Kim, S. & Hyun, M. (2005). The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropiate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 9(2), 213-232.
  14. Ko, S. (1996). Study on animal ecology conceptions of elementary school children. Master's degree dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  15. Kwak, Y. & Kim, J. (2002). Qualitative analysis on the characteristics of instructional methods of exemplary science teachers. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 5(1), 207-220.
  16. Lawton, M. (1997). Hands-on science gets a thumbs-up from students. Education Week, 16(30), 12.
  17. Lee, J. & Hong, S. (2009). Comparison of conceptions on 'insects' between the average and gifted students of elementary school. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 25(3), 276-291.
  18. Lee, S. (2007). Analysis of experiment activities experienced by elementary school 3rd grade teachers in their class of experiment. Master's degree dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  19. Lee, S., Jhun, Y., Hong, J., Shin, Y., Choi, J. & Lee, I. (2007). Difficulties experienced by elementary school teachers in science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  20. MOEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) (2010). Elementary school guidebook for teacher science 3-1 [초등학교 교사용 지도서 과학 3-1]. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
  21. Noh, T., Yoon, J. & Kang, S. (2009). The investigation of elementary school teachers' perceptions toward constructivist science assessment and their relationship with related variables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 352-360.
  22. Ozdileka, Z. & Calisa, S. (2010). The effect of pre-service science teachers' prior experiences on their interests about chemistry experiments. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 4863-4867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.785
  23. Park, J. & Kim, S. (1996). The survey of problem contexts suffering by the elementary teachers in the elementary science laboratory instruction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 264-275.
  24. Park, M. (1992). Elementary students' conceptions about the growth of animals and plants. Master's degree dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  25. Portia, S. B. (2001). The influence of secondary science teacher's pedagogical knowledge, equational beliefs and perceptions of the curriculum on implementation and science reform. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
  26. Prokop, P. & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). "Disgusting animals": primary school children's attitudes and myths of bats and spiders. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(2), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75309
  27. Rillero, P. (1994). Doing science with your children. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, ED372952.
  28. Sengul, S. H., Cetin, G. & Gur, H. (2008). The primary school science teachers' problems in science teaching. Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 82-88.
  29. Shepardson, D. (2002). Bugs, butterflies, and spiders: Children's understandings about insects. International Journal of Science Education, 24(6), 627-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110074765
  30. Sohn, S. (2005). Elementary preservice teachers' conceptions on molt and metamorphosis of insect. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 130-137.
  31. Son, B. (2003). Elementary school students' conceptions on insect structure and life cycle. Master's degree dissertation. Daegu National University of Education.
  32. Thomas, B. (2006). Composition studies and teaching anxiety: A pilot study of teaching groups and discipline and program-specific triggers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Bowling Green University, Bowling Green.
  33. Tsai, C. C. (2003). Taiwanese science students' and teachers' perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: exploring epistemological gaps. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 847-860. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305031
  34. Westerback, M. E. & Long, M. J. (1990). Science knowledge and the reduction of anxiety about teaching earth science in exemplary teachers as measured by the science teaching state-trait anxiety inventory. School Science and Mathematics, 90(1), 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1990.tb17225.x
  35. Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry project in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?. Science Education, 87(1), 112-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10044
  36. Yoo, W. (1992). Children's conceptions of growth. Master's degree dissertation, Korea National University of Education.
  37. Yoon, H. (2004). Pre-service elementary teachers' difficulties in science lessons. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 23(1), 74-84.
  38. Yuruk, N. (2011) The predictors of re-service elementary teachers' anxiety about teaching science. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 10(1), 17-26.

Cited by

  1. 초등예비 교사의 실험 수업 전, 후 생물 관찰에 대한 선호도 분석 vol.35, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2016.35.2.216
  2. 과학탐구 수업실행 전문성 요소에 의한 '과학탐구' 관련 연구동향 분석 vol.61, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.4.197
  3. 초등 예비교사들의 '배추흰나비 한살이' 탐구에서 나타난 지식변환 유형 탐색 vol.38, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2019.38.4.484