DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of Function and Factors for the Value Assessment of Ecosystem Service at Rice Paddy Wetland

논습지의 생태계서비스 가치평가를 위한 기능 및 요인분석

  • 공민재 (단국대학교-농촌진흥청 학연협동과정) ;
  • 이병모 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김남춘 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 손진관 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2014.02.04
  • Accepted : 2014.02.24
  • Published : 2014.05.31

Abstract

Recently, wetland and paddy wetland are being highlighted as the international environmental issues. However, research system which can assess paddy wetland is lacking. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess the value of paddy wetland by applying RAM to paddy wetland. In addition, we would like to use this study as the data to establish assessment method for paddy wetland. 16 sites were selected as research targets based on altitude and soil. As the results of wetland assessment, 16 research target sites had total score of 212~227 and the average of 2.17~2.50. It was similar to those of Lacustrine Wetlands, Palustrine Wetland and Riverine Wetland which were sites in previous studies. The value could be recognized as the wetland. However, there was no difference in assessment results based on altitude and soil. It was found that all conservation values were the same. The factor the most closely affecting conservation value was the area. However, there was limitation to apply existing wetland assessment system to paddy wetland. In order to assess paddy wetland, factors such as rice farming methods, topography, vegetation, growth environment and biodiversity should be added. It was thought to supplement wetland assessment system through various further studies.

최근들어 세계환경의 화두는 습지와 더불어 논습지 그리고 습지의 생태계서비스 기능에 집중 조명되고 있지만, 논습지의 생태계서비스를 평가 할 수 있는 연구체계가 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 기존의 습지평가체계를 논습지에 적용하여 습지로서 논의 가치를 평가해보는 동시에 논습지 중심의 평가체계를 구축하는 기초자료로 활용하고자 연구를 진행하였다. 연구 대상지는 고도와 토양을 기준으로 16곳을 선정하였다. 습지평가 결과 연구대상지 16곳은 총점 110점~118점, 평균 2.17~2.50으로 선행연구 사례지인 호수형습지, 소택형습지, 하천형습지와 비교해도 습지로서 가치가 인정되었다고 할 수 있다. 하지만 고도, 토성에 따라서는 평가결과의 차이는 없었으며, 보전가치는 모두 같게 나타났다. Pearson 상관분석을 통해 보전가치에 가장 밀접하게 작용하는 요인을 찾아본 결과, 면적이 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 기존의 습지평가체계로 논습지에 적용하기에는 한계가 있는 것으로 사료되어 논습지 평가를 위해서는 재배유형, 지형적 특성, 식생특성, 생육환경, 생물다양성 등의 다양한 후속 연구를 통해 습지평가체계를 보완할 필요가 있는 것으로 판단하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, US (2007). A study classifying type and assessing the function on riverine wetland : In the case of Kyoungan river, Master's Thesis, Sang Myung University, Cheonan-si, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  2. Kang, EO, Choi, YE and Kim, CH (2012). Study on function and vegetational assessment values of man-made Wetland in Gunsan City, J. of the Environmental Sciences, 21(8), pp. 997-1007. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2012.21.8.997
  3. Kim, KC (2005). Environment of rice cultivation and estimation on regional application level of chemical fertilizer in Jeollabuk-Do area, Ph.D. Dissertation, Chonbuk National University, Cheongju-si, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  4. Koo, BH and Kim, KG (2001). A study on the assessment for the function of inland wetlands using RAM(Rapid Assessment Method). J. of the Korean Environmental Restoration Technology, 4(3), pp. 38-48. [Korean Literature]
  5. Koo, BH (2009). Wetland Ecology, Landscape Book Publisher. [Korean Literature]
  6. Koo, MH and Lee, DK (2012). A Study on the national and international research trend of biodiversity assessment method and its application of environmental impact assessment. J. of the Korea Environmental Impact Assessment, 21(1), pp. 119-132. [Korean Literature]
  7. Korean Environmental Preservation Association (1996). Classification of Wetlands and the Importance of Wetlands in Asia Summary, 18(2), Korean Environmental Preservation Association. [Korean Literature]
  8. Korea Environment Institute(KEI). (2006). A Study on Policy Methods for Wetland conservation - Centering of Wetland Banking, 2006 RE-13, Korea Environment Institute. [Korean Literature]
  9. Lee, JY, Kang, DS and Sung, KJ (2010). Assessment of the wetland soil development in constructed Wetlands using the soil properties of a reference wetland, J. of Korean Wetlands Society, 12(1), pp. 1-14. [Korean Literature]
  10. Maltby, E. (2009). Functional Assessment of Wetlands : Towards Evaluation of Ecosystem Services, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge.
  11. Minestry of Environment(MoE), UNDP/GEF and Korea Wetland Project (KWP) (2007). National Wetland Inventory Development Project Final Report. GOVP1200951756, Ministry of Environment. [Korean Literature]
  12. Mitsch, WJ and Gosselimk, JG (2000). Wetlands, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  13. Ok, YS, Jung, J, Lee, H, Song, H, Jung, N, Lim, S and Kim, JG (2004). Chemical characterization and bioavailability of cadmium in artificially and naturally contaminated soils, J. of Korea Applied Biological Chemistry, 47(3), pp. 143-146. [Korean Literature]
  14. Park, ML (2009). Type classification and functional assessment of inland wetlands in Chung-nam provine, Master's Thesis, Sang Myung University, Cheonan-si, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  15. Ramsar Convention Secretariat(RCS) (2006). The Ramsar Convention Manual, 4th edition. Ramsar, [English Literature]
  16. Ramsar (2008). Draft Resolution X.31, Enhancing Biodiversity in Rice Paddies as Wetland Systems, 10th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands [Internet Literature]
  17. Ramsar (2014). Ramsar Homepage [Internet Literature]
  18. Rural Development Administration(RDA) (1992). Introduction of Soils in Korea, Agricultural Sciences Institute, Suwon-si, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  19. Seo, MH (1999). Convention on biological diversity and nature exploration. J. of the Korea Native Plant Conservation, 47, pp. 8-9.
  20. Son, JK (2009). The study on the environment fators affecting biodiversity at pond wetland in rural area, Master's Thesis, Dankook University, Cheonan-si, Korea. [Korean Literature]
  21. Son, JK, Kim, NC and Kang, BH (2010). The type classification and function assessment at small palustrine wetland in rural areas, J. of the Korean Environmental Restoration Technology, 13(6), pp. 117-131. [Korean Literature]
  22. Tilton, DL, Karen, S, Brian, B and William, T (2001). A wetland protection plan for the lower one subwatershed of the rouge river, Aquatic Botany, 28, pp. 227-242.