Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A qualitative study on educational usefulness and problems of smartpad-based instruction in elementary school

초등학교 스마트패드 활용수업의 교육적 유용성과 문제점에 관한 질적 연구

  • Leem, Junghoon (Dep. of Creative Human Resource Development, Incheon National University) ;
  • Ahn, Soonsun (Seohae Elementary School)
  • Received : 2014.02.12
  • Accepted : 2014.03.17
  • Published : 2014.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the educational usefulness, problems of smartpad-based instruction in elementary school based on qualitative research. To accomplish the purpose of the study, D elementary school in metropolitan area, two classes of digital textbook model school for seven years, were selected as the classes for observation. Six fourth and fifth graders and their teachers were interviewed and their 10 lessons were used for analyzing teaching and learning activities in smartpad-based instruction. The results of the study, 'Facilitating collaboration and interaction', 'effective use of various resource and SNS', 'improving concentrativeness', 'shortening waiting time' were identified as main educational usefulness. 'Lack of learning supporting tools', 'focusing on function rather than learning contents', 'low learning effectiveness', 'interference of flow' were presented as problems in using smartpad in classroom. Finally, some practical tasks for effective application of smartpad-based instruction were recommended.

이 연구는 스마트러닝을 위한 교수학습 도구로서 스마트패드를 활용한 수업의 교육적 유용성, 운영상 문제점을 질적 분석을 통해 탐색하고자 하였다. 연구대상은 스마트 클래스가 구축된 수도권 D초등학교 4학년, 5학년 2개 학급이었으며, 이들을 대상으로 수업을 촬영한 뒤 수업활동을 분석하였고 수업에 참여한 교사 2명과 학생 6명을 대상으로 심층 인터뷰를 실시하였다. 관찰한 수업내용과 인터뷰 자료들은 근거이론에 기반한 코딩방법을 사용하여 범주화 과정을 거쳤으며, 자료분석 도구로는 Nvivo 8.0을 사용하였다. 연구 결과 스마트패드 활용수업은 협업과 상호작용 촉진, 다양한 자료와 SNS의 효과적 사용, 수업집중도 향상, 기기 대기시간 단축 등과 같은 유용성이 있는 반면, 학습지원도구의 부족 및 실천모형 부재로 인한 수업진행의 어려움, 기능숙달에 과다한 시간의 투입, 활동에 비해 낮은 학습효과, 수업몰입의 방해 등과 같은 문제점들이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 끝으로, 향후 스마트패드 활용수업의 효과적 활용을 위한 실천과제들이 제안되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. H., Lim, K, Y. (2013). The effects of contiguity principle on learning achievement and cognitive load in learning with smartpads. Journal of Educational Technology, 29-3, 491-516. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.3.491
  2. Benlloch-Dualde, J. V., Buendía, F., & Cano, J. (2010). On the design of interactive classroom environments based on the tablet PC technology. 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, T4C-1-6.
  3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Research every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education. Washington D. C.
  4. Budiu, R., & Nielsen, J. (2010). iPad App and Website Usability 1st Eduition: Initial Findings Weeks after First iPad Launched. Nielsen Norman Group.
  5. Culen, A. L., & Gasparini, A. (2011). iPad: a new classroom technology? A report from two pilot studies. INFuture Proceedings, 199-208.
  6. Culen, A., Engen, B. K., Gasparini, A., & Herstad, J. (2011). The Use of iPad in Academic Setting: Ownership Issues in Relation to Technology (Non) Adoption.
  7. Fisher, B. A., Miller, K. G., Buhro, W. E., Frank, D. J., & Frey, R. F. (2012). Collaborating with faculty to design active learning with flexible technology. To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty, Instructional, and Organizational Development, 31, 329-354.
  8. Han, H. S., Lim, H. S. (2013). Analysis for teaching and learning methods in K-12 smart education. The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, 11-2, 51-58.
  9. Jo, M. H., Heo, H. O., Kang, E. S., Ryu, S. H., Kim, Y. D., Seo, J. H. (2013). The development and implementation of smart project learning that integrates formal education with informal learning. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 17-3, 291-304. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2013.17.3.291
  10. Jung, K. (2013). Cases of teaching and learning activities for smart education in lessons. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Open Education. 165-169.
  11. Kil, S. Y., An, J. H., Ryu, N. H., Park, S. H. (2012) A study on practical use of smart pad as a learning assistant device. Design Convergence study, 33, 3-16.
  12. Kim, G. D. (2011). A study on the user experience design based on the types of usage of smart pad. The Korean Journal of Korean Society of Basic Design & Art, 12-3, 49-59.
  13. Kim, M. J., Yoon, J. H. (2009). Implementation of mobile game interface through an operating interface analysis of touchscreen devices. Journal of Korean society of design science, 22-1, 231-244.
  14. Kim, M. R. (2012). Interaction analysis and educational use in SNS. Proceedings of KERIS Wednesday Forum.
  15. Koile, K., & Singer, D. (2006). Development of a tablet-pc-based system to increase instructor-student classroom interactions and student learning. The Impact of Pen-based Technology on Education: Vignettes, Evaluations, and Future Directions. Purdue University Press.
  16. Leem, J. H., Kim, S. H. (2013). Effects of individual learning and collaborative learning on academic achievement, self-directed learning skills and social efficacy in smart learning. The Journal of Educational Information & Media, 19-1, 1-24.
  17. Lim, B. R., Leem, J. H., Sung, E. M. (2013). What is the concept of smart education and the typology of smart education contents?. Journal of Educational Technology, 29-3, 459-489. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.3.459
  18. Lim, K. (2011). Research on developing Instructional design models for enhancing smart learning. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 14-2, 33-45.
  19. Manuguerra, M., & Petocz, P. (2011). Promoting student engagement by integrating new technology into tertiary education: The role of the iPad. Asian Social Science, 7-11, 61-65.
  20. Min, H. K., You, H. J., So, Y. N., Lim, S. E., Ryu, A. Y., Park, S. H. (2012). Designing smart pad application as an assistant tool of college lecture for cooperative learning. Design Convergence study, 33, 59-71.
  21. Ministry of Education, Science, & Technology (2011). Road to powerful nation for human resource development: Action strategies of smart education. Ministry of Education, Science, & Technology.
  22. Ogata, H., Yano, Y. (2004). Context-aware support for computer supported ubiquitous learnig. IEEE WMTE 2004, 27-34.
  23. Park, J. K., Leem, J. H. (2013). The Effects of types of social media on academic achievement, interation, and social efficacy in web-based project learning. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 17-3, 265-276. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2013.17.3.265
  24. Park, S. Y., Lim, K. (2012). Suggestions for building 'Smart Campus' Based on case studies on the effectiveness of instructions with smart-pads. The Journal of Digital Policy and Management, 10-3, 1-12.
  25. Rockinson-Szapkiw, Amanda J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
  26. Ryu, J. H. (2013). The impact of picture segmentation and navigational structure of e-book for smartpad on cognitive load. Journal of Educational Technology, 29-1, 55-77. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.29.1.55
  27. Susil, K. S., & Fred L. K. (2004). Web service architecture for M-Learning. Electronic Journal on e-Learning, 2-1, 203-216.

Cited by

  1. The Effect of Smartpad Based E-book and Performance Level on Cognitive Loads: Is Interactive Design Effective? vol.27, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2015.27.2.177
  2. 스마트기기를 활용한 과학 교사의 교수 실행과 과학교육에서 스마트교육 적용 방안에 대한 의견 조사 vol.35, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0829
  3. 스마트러닝의 공교육 정착을 위한 성공전략 연구 vol.16, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7472/jksii.2015.16.6.123
  4. A Study on the Effectiveness of Smart Education Based on Learning Ability vol.21, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2016.21.9.165
  5. 방사선과 학생의 스마트 학습법 적용이 자기 주도적 학습능력, 학업적 자기 효능감, 학습 만족도에 미치는 영향 vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17946/jrst.2016.39.4.24
  6. 방사선과 학생의 스마트 학습법 적용이 자기 주도적 학습능력, 학업적 자기 효능감, 학습 만족도에 미치는 영향 vol.39, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17946/jrst.2016.39.4.24
  7. 스마트 학습법이 보건 계열 학생들에게 성취목표지향성 및 학업적 자기 효능감이 미치는 효과 vol.11, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2017.11.4.279
  8. 대학생 핵심역량 증진을 위한 스마트러닝기반 비교과교육의 효과 vol.16, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2018.16.3.027
  9. Analysis on the Experience and Intention of Acceptance, Attitude of Use, Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use about Flipped Learning of University professor vol.28, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.21024/pnuedi.28.1.201803.295
  10. The Effect of Teacher’s Corrective Feedback Through Online Conferencing on Elementary Students’ English-Speaking Confidence vol.22, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.16875/stem.2021.22.3.59