Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis

  • Received : 2014.04.19
  • Accepted : 2014.05.23
  • Published : 2014.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Rehabilitation of the incomplete dentition by means of osseointegrated dental implants represents a highly predictable and widespread therapy; however, little is known about potential risk factors that may impair long-term implant success. Methods: From 2004 to 2012, a total of 13,147 implants were placed in 4,316 patients at the Academy for Oral Implantology in Vienna. The survival rates after 8 years of follow-up were computed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of patient- and implant-related risk factors was assessed. Results: Overall implant survival was 97% and was not associated with implant length (P=0.930), implant diameter (P=0.704), jaw location (P=0.545), implant position (P=0.450), local bone quality (P=0.398), previous bone augmentation surgery (P=0.617), or patient-related factors including osteoporosis (P=0.661), age (P=0.575), or diabetes mellitus (P=0.928). However, smoking increased the risk of implant failure by 3 folds (P<0.001) and a positive history of periodontal disease doubled the failure risk (P=0.001). Conclusions: Summing up the long-term results of well over 10,000 implants at the Academy for Oral Implantology in Vienna it can be concluded that there is only a limited number of patients that do not qualify for implant therapy and may thus not benefit from improved quality of life associated with fixed implant-retained prostheses.

Keywords

References

  1. Pommer B, Zechner W, Watzek G, Palmer R. To graft or not to graft? Evidence-based guide to decision making in oral bone graft surgery. In: Zorzi A, Miranda J, editors. Bone Grafting. Rijeka: InTech; 2012. p.159-82.
  2. Levin L. Dealing with dental implant failures. J Appl Oral Sci 2008; 16:171-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000300002
  3. Palma-Carrio C, Maestre-Ferrin L, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago MA, Penarrocha-Diago M. Risk factors associated with early failure of dental implants: a literature review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:e514-7.
  4. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:377-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.018
  5. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17 Suppl 2:136-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01357.x
  6. Pommer B, Hof M, Fadler A, Gahleitner A, Watzek G, Watzak G. Primary implant stability in the atrophic sinus floor of human cadaver maxillae: impact of residual ridge height, bone density, and implant diameter. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e109-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12071
  7. Diz P, Scully C, Sanz M. Dental implants in the medically compromised patient. J Dent 2013;41:195-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.12.008
  8. Clementini M, Rossetti PH, Penarrocha D, Micarelli C, Bonachela WC, Canullo L. Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43:323-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.012
  9. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011;38:856-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01750.x
  10. Andersen E, Saxegaard E, Knutsen BM, Haanaes HR. A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrow-diameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:217-24.
  11. Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F, Lindstrom H. Branemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:61-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00107.x
  12. Arisan V, Bolukbasi N, Ersanli S, Ozdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21: 296-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01840.x
  13. Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:266-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2
  14. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p.199-220.
  15. Charyeva O, Altynbekov K, Zhartybaev R, Sabdanaliev A. Longterm dental implant success and survival: a clinical study after an observation period up to 6 years. Swed Dent J 2012;36:1-6.
  16. Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16-year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:772-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01912.x
  17. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.12.x
  18. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol 2013;84:895-904. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120328
  19. Sohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:515-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02410.x
  20. Strietzel FP, Reichart PA, Kale A, Kulkarni M, Wegner B, Kuchler I. Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:523-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01083.x
  21. Safii SH, Palmer RM, Wilson RF. Risk of implant failure and marginal bone loss in subjects with a history of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:165-74.
  22. Bornstein MM, Cionca N, Mombelli A. Systemic conditions and treatments as risks for implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:12-27.
  23. Salvi GE, Carollo-Bittel B, Lang NP. Effects of diabetes mellitus on periodontal and peri-implant conditions: update on associations and risks. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):398-409.
  24. Chao YL, Chen HH, Mei CC, Tu YK, Lu HK. Meta-regression analysis of the initial bone height for predicting implant survival rates of two sinus elevation procedures. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37: 456-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01555.x
  25. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(3):CD008397.
  26. Graziani F, Donos N, Needleman I, Gabriele M, Tonetti M. Comparison of implant survival following sinus floor augmentation procedures with implants placed in pristine posterior maxillary bone: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:677-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01116.x
  27. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  28. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 Suppl:49-70.
  29. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL. Vertical bone augmentation: where are we now? Implant Dent 2006;15:219-28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000226824.39526.71
  30. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 Suppl:237-59.
  31. Clementini M, Morlupi A, Canullo L, Agrestini C, Barlattani A. Success rate of dental implants inserted in horizontal and vertical guided bone regenerated areas: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:847-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.03.016
  32. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):173-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01269.x
  33. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24 Suppl:218-36.
  34. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35(8 Suppl):203-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01271.x
  35. Waasdorp J, Reynolds MA. Allogeneic bone onlay grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:525-31.
  36. Sbordone L, Toti P, Menchini-Fabris G, Sbordone C, Guidetti F. Implant survival in maxillary and mandibular osseous onlay grafts and native bone: a 3-year clinical and computerized tomographic follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 695-703.

Cited by

  1. Prevalence and Predictive Factors for Peri-Implant Disease and Implant Failure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis vol.86, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2014.140438
  2. Dental implants and diabetes mellitus—a systematic review vol.2, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0038-2
  3. Post‐treatment supportive care for the natural dentition and dental implants vol.71, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12122
  4. Periodontal and peri‐implant diseases: identical or fraternal infections? vol.31, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/omi.12124
  5. Analysis of the Factors Affecting Surgical Success of Implants Placed in Iranian Warfare Victims vol.25, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1159/000447696
  6. The feasibility of immediately loading dental implants in edentulous jaws vol.46, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.234
  7. Risk indicators related to periimplant disease: an observational retrospective cohort study vol.46, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2016.46.4.266
  8. Role of supportive maintenance therapy on implant survival: a university‐based 17 years retrospective analysis vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12188
  9. Mucositis, peri-implantitis, and survival and success rates of oxide-coated implants in patients treated for periodontitis 3- to 6-year results of a case-series study vol.3, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-017-0110-6
  10. Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study vol.7, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_380_17
  11. Survival of Branemark System Mk III implants and analysis of risk factors associated with implant failure vol.46, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.014
  12. Short term sodium alendronate administration improves the peri-implant bone quality in osteoporotic animals vol.25, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-77572016-0165
  13. Air-Abrasive Disinfection of Implant Surfaces in a Simulated Model of Periimplantitis vol.26, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000597
  14. Risk Factors associated with Dental Implant Failure: A Study of 302 Implants placed in a Regional Center vol.18, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2111
  15. Implant survival and patient satisfaction in completely edentulous patients with immediate placement of implants: a retrospective study vol.18, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0669-1
  16. Raloxifene but not alendronate can compensate the impaired osseointegration in osteoporotic rats vol.22, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2106-2
  17. Long-term Retrospective Study based on Implant Success Rate in Patients with Risk Factor: 15-year Follow-up vol.19, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2217
  18. A comparative study on the stress distribution around dental implants in three arch form models for replacing six implants using finite element analysis vol.22, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_141_17
  19. Retrospective cohort study of a tapered implant with high primary stability in patients with local and systemic risk factors—7-year data vol.4, pp.None, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0151-5
  20. Long-term Retrospective Study on Cumulative Survival Rate of Implants with Guided Bone Regeneration vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180016
  21. Implant Success Predictors vol.9, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1222
  22. Soft-Tissue Management as Part of the Surgical Treatment of Periimplantitis : A Narrative Review vol.28, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000870
  23. Systemic Risk Factors for the Development of Periimplant Diseases vol.28, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000873
  24. Comparative Analysis of the Chemical Composition and Microstructure Conformation Between Different Dental Implant Bone Drills vol.12, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111866
  25. Association of Global DNA Methylation to Titanium and Peri-Implantitis: A Case-Control Study vol.4, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084418822831
  26. Predicting peri‐implant disease: Chi‐square automatic interaction detection (CHAID) decision tree analysis of risk indicators vol.90, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.17-0501
  27. Digital imaging evaluation of the scapula for prediction of endosteal implant placement in reconstruction of oromandibular defects with scapular free flaps vol.39, pp.8, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30466
  28. Retrospective evaluation of marginal bone loss around implants in a mandibular locator‐retained denture using panoramic radiographic images and finite element analysis: A pilot study vol.21, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12857
  29. I Do Biotech Dental Implants: Prospective Multicentric Study after 5 Years of Functional Loading vol.10, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4236/ojst.2020.106014
  30. Osseointegration of Maxillary Dental Implants in Diabetes Mellitus Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Human Histomorphometric Study vol.10, pp.19, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196762
  31. The non-viral vectors and main methods of loading siRNA onto the titanium implants and their application vol.31, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1793706
  32. Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors vol.51, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2005100255
  33. The In Vitro Evaluation of Preosteoblast Migration From 3-D-printed Scaffolds to Decontaminated Smooth and Minimally Rough Titanium Surfaces: A Pilot Study vol.49, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1177/02611929211022165
  34. The survival rates and risk factors of implants in the early stage: a retrospective study vol.21, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01651-8