Metals and materials international

The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials (대한금속재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biocompatibility of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels Prepared by Porous Hyaluronic Acid Microbeads

  • Kim, Jin-Tae (Daelim University, Department of Biomedical Engineering) ;
  • Lee, Deuk Yong (Daelim University, Department of Biomedical Engineering) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Hyung (Kangwon National University, Department of Radiological Science) ;
  • Song, Yo-Seung (Korea Aerospace University, Department of Materials Engineering) ;
  • Cho, Nam-Ihn (Sun Moon University, Department of Electronic Engineering)
  • Received : 2013.03.19
  • Accepted : 2013.09.28
  • Published : 2014.05.20
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Hyaluronic acid hydrogels (HAHs) were synthesized by immersing HA microbeads crosslinked with divinyl sulfone in a phosphate buffered saline solution to evaluate the biocompatibility of the gels by means of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity (in vitro chromosome aberration test, reverse mutation assay, and in vivo micronucleus test), skin sensitization, and intradermal reactivity. The HAHs induced no cytotoxicity or genotoxicity. In guinea pigs treated with grafts and prostheses, no animals died and there were no abnormal clinical signs. The sensitization scores were zero in all guinea pigs after 24 h and 48 h challenge, suggesting that the HAHs had no contact allergic sensitization in the guinea pig maximization test. No abnormal signs were found in New Zealand White rabbits during the 72 h observation period after the injection. There was no difference between the HAHs and negative control mean scores because skin reaction such as erythema or oedema was not observed after injection. Experimental results suggest that the HAHs would be suitable for soft tissue augmentation due to the absence of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, skin sensitization, and intradermal reactivity.

Keywords

References

  1. G. D. Monheit and K. M. Comeman, Dermatol. Therapy 19, 141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00068.x
  2. R. S. Narins, F. Brandt, J. Leyden, and Z. P. Lorene, Dermatol. Surg. 29, 588 (2003).
  3. S. Fernandez-Cossio and M. T. Castano-Oreja, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 117, 1789 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000214656.07273.b0
  4. A. Pourjavadi and M. Kurdtabar, Eur. Polym. J. 43, 877 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.12.020
  5. Y. Hong, H. Song, Y. Gong, Z. Mao, C. Gao, and J. Shen, Acta Biomater. 3, 23 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.06.007
  6. P. A. Ramires, M. A. Miccoli, L. Dini, and C. Protopapa, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B:Appl. Biomater. 72B, 230 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30157
  7. H. Omidian, J. G. Rocca, and K. Park, J. Control. Release 102, 3 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.09.028
  8. J. T. Kim, D. Y. Lee, and J. H. Choi, Biomater. Res. 14, 157 (2010).
  9. D. H. Shin, S. S. Chun, M. W. Ahn, I. H. Song, and S. K. Kim, Korean J. Met. Mater. 50, 338 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3365/KJMM.2012.50.4.338
  10. S. K. Kim and V. H. Pham, Korean J. Met. Mater. 51, 907 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3365/KJMM.2013.51.12.907
  11. J. Kopecek and J. Yang, Polymer Int. 56, 1078 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.2253
  12. A. C. Jen, M. C. Wake, and A. G. Mikos, Biotech, Bioeng. 50, 357 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960520)50:4<357::AID-BIT2>3.3.CO;2-F
  13. W. E. Hennink and C. F. Van Nostrum, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 54, 13 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00240-X
  14. A. S. Hoffman, Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev. 54, 3 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00239-3
  15. J. T. Kim, D. Y. Lee, and J. H. Choi, Biomater. Res. 15, 125 (2011).
  16. ISO 10993-3:2003, Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part3: Tests for genotoxicity, carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity.
  17. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals TG No. 473, In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test (1997).
  18. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals TG No. 471, Genetic Toxicology: Salmonella typhimurium, Reverse Mutation Assay (1997).
  19. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals TG No. 472, Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay (1997).
  20. D. M. Maron and B. N. Ames, Revised methods of the Salmonella Mutagenicity Test. Mutat. Res. 113, 173 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1161(83)90010-9
  21. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals TG No. 474, Genetic Toxicology: Micronucleus Test.
  22. ISO 10993-10:2002, Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part10: Tests for irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivity: Maximization test for delayed hypersensitivity.
  23. ISO 10993-10:2002, Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part10: Tests for irritation and delayed-type hypersensitivity: Intracutaneous (intradermal) reactivity test.

Cited by

  1. 3차원 다공성 콜라겐지지체의 제조 및 특성 분석 vol.35, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9718/jber.2014.35.6.192
  2. 다공성 폴리(ε-카프로락톤)/실리카 복합체의 제조 및 특성평가 vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7317/pk.2015.39.2.323
  3. Effect of surface-treatments on flexibility and guided bone regeneration of titanium barrier membrane vol.25, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.6111/jkcgct.2015.25.3.098
  4. Effect of molecular weight of hyaluronic acid (HA) on viscoelasticity and particle texturing feel of HA dermal biphasic fillers vol.20, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0073-3
  5. An Effective Translation: The Development of Hyaluronan-Based Medical Products From the Physicochemical, and Preclinical Aspects vol.6, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2018.00062
  6. Mechanical properties and cytotoxicity of PLA/PCL films vol.8, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-018-0065-4
  7. Bacterial hyaluronic acid production through an alternative extraction method and its characterization vol.94, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5957
  8. A mechanically enhanced electroactive hydrogel for 3D printing using a multileg long chain crosslinker vol.28, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665x/ab325d
  9. CD44-Mediated Methotrexate Delivery by Hyaluronan-Coated Nanoparticles Composed of a Branched Cell-Penetrating Peptide vol.6, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01724
  10. Natural-based Hydrogels: A Journey from Simple to Smart Networks for Medical Examination vol.27, pp.16, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867326666190816125144
  11. Applications of Hyaluronic Acid in Ophthalmology and Contact Lenses vol.26, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26092485
  12. Curdlan-Based Hydrogels for Potential Application as Dressings for Promotion of Skin Wound Healing-Preliminary In Vitro Studies vol.14, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092344