DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biomass Production in the Short Rotation Coppice of Poplar Species Treated with Low-Concentrated Liquid Fertilizer

저농도 액비 처리에 의한 포플러 단벌기 맹아림의 바이오매스 생산

  • Kim, Hyun-Chul (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Shin, Hanna (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Heon-Ho (Department of Forest Resources, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Yeo, Jin-Kie (Center of Forest Carbon Certification, Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) ;
  • Kang, Kyu-Suk (Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 김현철 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 신한나 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 이헌호 (영남대학교 산림자원학과) ;
  • 여진기 (한국임업진흥원 산림탄소인증센터) ;
  • 강규석 (서울대학교 산림과학부)
  • Received : 2013.08.28
  • Accepted : 2013.12.17
  • Published : 2014.03.31

Abstract

A short rotation coppice (SRC) refers to cultivation systems using fast-growing tree species with the ability to re-sprout from the stump after harvest. Harvest in SRC cultivation occurs in short intervals, 2-6 years, and management practices are more similar to those of agricultural annual crops than to forestry. The SRC for production of biomass for heat and electricity is considered a very promising means to meet the different targets set to increase the amount of renewable energy. This study was conducted to analyze growth characteristics and biomass production of poplar clones in the SRC under the treatment of slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer (SCBLF). The average survival rate of poplar clones at SCBLF treatment was 95.0% and that at control was 92.5%, respectively. The average number of shoot at the treatment was 11.8 ea/clone and that of control was 11.5 ea/clone. '72-31', 'Bonghwa1' and 'Clivus' from Populus alba ${\times}$ P. glandulosa were superior clones for the number of shoot with 17.1 ea/clone, 14.5 ea/clone and 13.8 ea/clone at the treatment of SCBLF. For the average of leaf area, the SCBLF treatment showed 35% broader leaf ($71.0cm^2$) than control ($52.3cm^2$). The annual average of above-ground biomass production showed 51% better at the SCBLF treatment (8.5 ton/ha) than control (5.6 ton/ha). 'Clivus', '72-31' and 'Bonghwa1' clones from P. alba ${\times}$ P. glandulosa were superior for the annual average of above-ground biomass production with 15.2 ton/ha, 14.0 ton/ha and 11.6 ton/ha at the treatment of SCBLF.

SCB액비 처리에 의한 포플러 클론들의 생육특성을 조사한 결과, 생존율은 처리구와 무처리구에서 각각 95.0%와 92.5%로 양호하게 나타났다. 포플러 클론들의 평균 줄기 수는 처리구 및 무처리구에서 각각 11.8개와 11.5개로 나타났으며, SCB액비 처리구에서 현사시 72-31, Bonghwa1 및 Clivus클론이 각각 17.1개, 14.5개 및 13.8개로 우수하게 나타났다. 평균 엽면적은 처리구 및 무처리구에서 각각 $71.0cm^2$$52.3cm^2$로 나타나 처리구가 35% 높았다. 포플러 단벌기 맹아림의 연평균 지상부 바이오매스 생산량을 조사한 결과, 처리구 및 무처리구의 연평균 바이오매스 생산량은 각각 8.5ton/ha와 5.6 ton/ha로 나타나 처리구가 51% 우수하였으며, SCB액비 처리구에서 현사시 Clivus, 72-31 및 Bonghwa1 클론이 각각 15.2 ton/ha, 14.0 ton/ha 및 11.6 ton/ha로 우수하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국립산림과학원

References

  1. Baskerville GL. 1972. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass. Can. J. Forest Res. 2: 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1139/x72-009
  2. Dauen A, Quilez D. 2004. Pig slurry versus mineral fertilization on corn yield and nitrate leaching in a Mediterranean irrigated environment. Eur. J. Agron. 21: 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(03)00056-X
  3. Gray KA, Zhao L, Emptage M. 2006. Bioethanol. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10: 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.02.035
  4. Hamelinck C, Hooijdonk G, Faaij A. 2005. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass technoeconomic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenergy 28: 384-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.09.002
  5. Ham SK, Kim YS, Kim TS, Kim KS, Park CH. 2009. The effect of SCB (slurry composition and biofilter) liquid fertilizer on growth of creeping bentgrasss. Korean J. Turfgrass Sci. 23: 97-100.
  6. Hyun YI, Kim JH, Han YC, Lee KJ. 1982. Wood biomass production of twelve tree species in coppice plantations managed under 1-, 2- and 3-year rotations. J. Korean Forest Soc. 55: 30-36.
  7. Kim HC, Yeo JK, Koo YB, Shin H, Choi JY, Lee HH. 2011. Growth and biomass production of fast growing tree species treated with slurry composting and biofiltration liquid fertilizer. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertilizer 44: 206-214. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2011.44.2.206
  8. Kim JS, Lee KB, Lee DB, Lee SB, Na SY. 2004. Influence of liquid pig manure on rice growth and nutrient movement in paddy soil under different drainage conditions. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fertilizer 37: 97-103.
  9. Laureysens L, Draedt W, Indeherberge T, Ceulemans R. 2003. Population dynamics in a 6-year old coppice culture of poplar.I.Clonal differences in stool mortality, Shoot dynamics and shoot diameter distribution in relation to biomass production. Biomass Bioenergy 24: 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00105-8
  10. Laureysens L, Pellis A, Willems J, Ceulemans R. 2005. Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar. III. Second rotation results. Biomass Bioenergy 29: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.02.005
  11. Lee JE, Heo SW. 2009. A study on recycling systems of livestock excretions and benefits analysis. Korean J. Agricul. Management Policy 36: 371-393.
  12. Lim TJ, Hong SD, Kim SH, Park JM. 2008. Evaluation of yield and quality from red pepper for application rates of pig slurry composting biofiltration. Korean J. Environ. Agriculture 27: 171-177. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2008.27.2.171
  13. Misselbrook TH, Smith KA, Jackson DR, Gilhespy SL. 2004. Ammonia emissions from irrigation of dilute pig slurries. Biosys. Engin. 89: 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.08.015
  14. Paschold JS, Wienhold BJ, McCallister DL, Ferguson RB. 2008. Crop nitrogen and phosphorus utilization following application of slurry from swine fed traditional or low phytate corn diets. Agron. J. 100: 997-1004. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0248
  15. Pellis A, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R. 2004. Growth and production of a short rotation coppice culture of poplar I. Clonal differences in leaf characteristics in relation to biomass production. Biomass Bioenergy 27: 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.001
  16. Sanchez O, Cardona C. 2008. Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresource Technol. 99: 5270-5295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013
  17. Son YM, Lee KH, Kim RH. 2007. Estimation of forest biomass in Korea. J. Korean Forest Soc. 96: 477-482.
  18. Tubby I, Armstrong A. 2002. Establishment and management of short rotation coppice Forestry Commission. pp.12.