Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology : HEB

Korean Society of Horticultural Science (한국원예학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shoot Growth and Physiological Disorder of Cut Rose 'Charming Black' as Affected by Drought Stress during Nocturnal Supplemental Lighting

  • Shi, Liyun (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul) ;
  • Kim, Wan Soon (Department of Environmental Horticulture, University of Seoul)
  • Received : 2013.11.26
  • Accepted : 2014.02.03
  • Published : 2014.04.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Cut rose 'Charming Black' was subjected to three treatments to investigate whether a no-irrigation regime causes drought stress during nocturnal supplemental lighting, and to investigate the effect of drought stress on the growth and quality of the cut flower. During the experiment, shoot length, quality of flower, photosynthetic rate, and chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were measured. Supplemental lighting treatment group grew faster and decreased the percentage of blind shoot; however, several physiological disorders were appeared under different environment conditions. In supplemental lighting ($90{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$ PPFD) treatment group, the shoot grew well and flowered early with irrigation once per hour, but drought stress and a decrease in biomass occurred without irrigation. Water deficit in the no-irrigation regime under supplemental lighting affected the plant growth and caused malformation of the flower. Drought stress also had a negative effect on the photosynthetic machinery with a reduction in carotenoid and chlorophyll contents. As a result the photosynthetic rate was also decreased.

Keywords

References

  1. Anjum, F., M. Yaseen, E. Rasul, A. Wahid, and S. Anjum. 2003. Drought stress in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.): Effect on chemical composition and chlorophyll contents. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 40:45-49.
  2. Bolla, A., M. Koukourikou-Petridou, D. Voyiatzis, and D. Chimonidou. 2009. Physiological responses associated to substrate water availability of Rosa 'urored'plants grown in soilless greenhouse conditions. Sci. Hort. 121:80-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.016
  3. Bolla, A., D. Voyiatzis, M. Koukourikou-Petridou, and D. Chimonidou. 2010. Photosynthetic parameters and cut-flower yield of rose 'urored'(H.T.) are adversely affected by mild drought stress irrespective of substrate composition. Sci. Hort. 126:390-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.07.034
  4. Chimonidou-Pavlidou, D. 1996. Effect of drought stress at different stages of rose development. Acta Hort. 424:5-51.
  5. Chimonidou-Pavlidou, D. 1999. Irrigation and sensitive stages of development. Acta Hort. 481:393-401.
  6. Chimonidou-Pavlidou, D. 2004. Malformation of roses due to drought stress. Sci. Hort. 99:79-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(03)00087-6
  7. Farooq, M., A. Wahid, N. Kobayashi, D. Fujita, and S.M.A. Basra. 2009. Plant drought stress: Effects, mechanisms and management. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29:185-212. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008021
  8. Hale, M.G. and D.M. Orcutt. 1987. The physiology of plants under stress. A Wiley Inter Sci. publication, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.
  9. Halevy, A.H. and N. Zieslin. 1969. The development and causes of petal blackening and malformation of 'accara'rose flowers. Acta Hort. 14:149-156.
  10. Jaleel, C.A., P. Manivannan, G.M.A. Lakshmanan, M. Gomathinayagam, and R. Panneerselvam. 2008. Alterations in morphological parameters and photosynthetic pigment responses of Catharanthus roseus under soil water deficits. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 61:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.09.008
  11. Katsoulas, N., C. Kittas, G. Dimokas, and Ch. Lykas. 2006. Effect of irrigation frequency on rose flower production and quality. Biosys. Engineer. 93:237-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.11.006
  12. Kim, W.S. and J.S. Lee. 2008. Growth and light use efficiency under different light intensities of cut rose 'ote Rose'as affected by night temperature. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 49:226-231.
  13. Kim, W.S. and J.H. Lieth. 2012. Simulation of year-round plant growth and nutrient uptake in Rosa hybrida over flowering cycles. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 53:193-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-012-0054-y
  14. Kool, M.T.N. and E.F.A. Lenssen. 1997. Basal-shoot formation in young rose plants: Effects of bending practices and plant density. J. Hort. Sci. 72:635-644.
  15. Lieth, J.H. and D.W. Burger. 1989. Growth of chrysanthemum using an irrigation system controlled by soil moisture tension. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:387-392.
  16. Lichtenthaler, H.K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 148:350-382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1
  17. Milburn, J.A. 1979. Water flow in plants. Longman, London. Moe, R. 1971.
  18. Moe, R. 1971. Factors affecting flower abortion and malformation in roses. Physiol. Plant. 24:292-300.
  19. Moe, R. 1988. Growth and flowering in roses. Acta Hort. 281:121-129.
  20. Neocleous, D. and M. Vasilkakis. 2007. Effect of NaCl stress on red raspberry (Rubus idaeus L. Autumn. Bliss). Sci. Hort. 112:282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.12.025
  21. Raviv, M. and T.J. Blom, 2001. The effect of water availability and quality on photosynthesis and productivity of soilless-grown cut roses. Sci. Hort. 88:257-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(00)00239-9
  22. Zaccai, M., R. Ackerman, O. Genis, J. Riov, and M. Zik. 2009. The bent peduncle phenomenon in roses is a developmental process involving auxin. Plant Sci. 176:736-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.02.014
  23. Zimmermann, M.H. 1978. Hydraulic architecture of some diffuse porous trees. Can. J. Bot. 56:2286-2295. https://doi.org/10.1139/b78-274

Cited by

  1. Effect of drought stress on shoot growth and physiological response in the cut rose ‘charming black’ at different developmental stages vol.60, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-0098-8
  2. The role of slab water content during supplemental lighting on shoot growth and physiological response of cut rose ‘Charming Black’ vol.60, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-019-00125-9
  3. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations of Rosa hybrida ‘Pink Bell’ under drought stress vol.1291, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2020.1291.14