Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회지)

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Adsorption Sampling and Thermal Desorption with GC/MS Analysis for the Measurement of Low-Molecular Weight PAHs in Ambient Air

환경대기 중 저분자 PAHs 측정을 위한 흡착-열탈착-GC/MS 방법의 적용

  • Seo, Seok-Jun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Seo, Young-Kyo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Hwang, Yoon-Jung (Public Health and Environment Institute of Daegu City) ;
  • Jung, Dong-Hee (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Baek, Sung-Ok (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yeungnam University)
  • Received : 2014.07.02
  • Accepted : 2014.07.18
  • Published : 2014.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have been of particular concern since they are present both in the vapor and particulate phases in ambient air. In this study, a simple method was applied to determine the vapor phase PAHs, and the performance of the new method was evaluated with a conventional method. The simple method was based on adsorption sampling and thermal desorption with GC/MS analysis, which is generally applied to the determination of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the air. A combination of Carbotrap (300 mg) and Carbotrap-C (100 mg) sorbents was used as the adsorbent. Target compounds included two rings PAHs such as naphthalene, acenaphthylene, and acenaphthene. Among them, naphthalene was listed as one of the main HAPs together with a number of VOCs in petroleum refining industries in the USA. For comparison purposes, a method based on adsorption sampling and solvent extraction with GC/MS analysis was adopted, which is in principle same as the NIOSH 5515 method. The performance of the adsorption sampling and thermal desorption method was evaluated with respect to repeatabilities, detection limits, linearities, and storage stabilities for target compounds. The analytical repeatabilities of standard samples are all within 20%. Lower detection limits was estimated to be less than 0.1 ppbv. In the results from comparison studies between two methods for real air samples. Although the correlation coefficients were more than 0.9, a systematic difference between the two groups was revealed by the paired t-test (${\alpha}$=0.05). Concentrations of two-rings PAHs determined by adsorption and thermal desorption method consistently higher than those by solvent extraction method. The difference was caused by not only the poor sampling efficiencies of XAD-2 for target PAHs and but also sample losses during the solvent extraction and concentration procedure. This implies that the levels of lower molecular PAHs tend to be underestimated when determined by a conventional PAH method utilizing XAD-2 (and/or PUF) sampling and solvent extraction method. The adsorption sampling and thermal desorption with GC analysis is very simple, rapid, and reliable for lower-molecular weight PAHs. In addition, the method can be used for the measurement of VOCs in the air simultaneously. Therefore, we recommend that the determination of naphthalene, the most volatile PAH, will be better when it is measured by a VOC method instead of a conventional PAH method from a viewpoint of accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, S.O. (1999) Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons -environmental implications, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 15(5), 525-544.
  2. Baek, S.O. and J.S. Choi (1998a) Evaluation of sampling methodology for the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere, J. Korean Air Pollution Res. Assoc., 14(1), 43-62.
  3. Baek, S.O. and J.S. Choi (1998b) Effect of ambient temperature on the distribution of atmospheric concentrations of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons in the vapor and particulate phases, J. Korean Air Pollution Res. Assoc., 14(2), 117-131.
  4. Baek, S.O., R.A. Field, M.E. Goldstone, P.W. Kirk, J.N. Lester, and R. Perry (1991) Concentrations particulate and gaseous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in London air following the lead content of petrol in the United Kingdom, Environ. Sci. Tech., 22, 503-520.
  5. Chuang, J.C., P.J. Callahan, C.W. Lyu, and N.K. Wilson (1999) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposures of children in low-income families, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 9, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500003
  6. Conde, F.J., J.H. Ayala, A.M. Afonso, and V. Gonzalez (2005) Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from combustion of agricultural and sylvicultural debris, Atmos. Environ., 39(35), 6654-6663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.07.043
  7. Eiguren-Fernandez, A., A.H. Miguel, J.R. Fronines, S. Thurairatnam, and L. Avol (2004) Seasonal and Spatial variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vapor-phase and $PM_{2.5}$ in Southern California urban and rural communities, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38(5), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820490449511
  8. Glaser, J.A., D.L. Foerst, G.D. McKee, S.A. Quave, and W.L. Budde (1981) Trace analysis for wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Tech., 15(12), 1426-1435. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00094a002
  9. International Standard Organization (2000) Ambient air-Determination of total (gas and particle phase) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - Collection on sorbent-backed filters with gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analyses. Reference Number ISO 12884:2000(E).
  10. Li, C.S. and Y.S. Ro (2000) Indoor characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere of Taipei, Atmos. Environ., 34(4), 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00171-5
  11. Lobscheid, A.B., T.E. Mckone, and D.A. Vallero (2007) Exploring relationships between outdoor air particulateassociated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and $PM_{2.5}$: A case study of benzo(a)pyrene in California metropolitan regions, Atmos. Environ., 41(27), 5659-5672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.02.042
  12. Lu, R., J. Wu, R.P. Turco, A.M. Winer, R. Atkinson, J. Arey, S.E. Paulson, F.W. Lurmann, A.H. Miguel, and A.E. Fernandez (2005) Naphthalene distributions and human exposure in Southern California, Atmos. Environ., 39(3), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.045
  13. Marr, L.C., T.W. Kirchstetter, R.A. Harley, A.H. Miguel, S.V. Hering, and S.K. Hammond (1999) Characterization of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbons in motor vehicle fuel and exhaust emissions, Environ. Sci. Tech., 33 (18), 3091-3099. https://doi.org/10.1021/es981227l
  14. Menichini, E., N. Iacovella, F. Monfredini, and L. Turrio-Baldassarri (2007) Relationships between indoor and outdoor air pollution by carcinogenic PAHs and PCBs, Atmos. Environ., 41(40), 9518-9529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.041
  15. Miller, J.C. and J.N. Miller (1987) Statistics for analytical chemistry (2nd ed.), Trans-Atlantic Pub., 18-19 pp.
  16. Rhead, M.M. and R.D. Pemberton (1996) Sources of naphthalene in diesel exhaust emissions, Energy & Fuels, 10, 837-843. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9502261
  17. Schauer, J.J., M.J. Kleeman, G.R. Cass, and B.R.T. Simoneit (1999) Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 2. C-1 through C-30 organic compounds from medium duty diesel trucks, Environ. Sci. Tech., 33(10), 1578-1587. https://doi.org/10.1021/es980081n
  18. USEPA (1990) Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit, 40 CFR Part 136 (analytical procedure), appendix B, 319.
  19. USEPA (1999) Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air, Compendium Method TO-17 (http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/files/ambient/airtox/tocomp99.pdf)
  20. USEPA(2003) Health effects support document for naphthalene (http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/pdfs/reg_determine1/ support_cc1_naphthalene_healtheffects.pdf)
  21. USEPA (2012) Integrated Risk Information System, Naphthalene (http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/subst/0436.htm)

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Particle Collection Efficiency in a Wet Electrostatic Precipitator Using an Electrosprayed Discharge Electrode vol.31, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2015.31.6.530
  2. from Stationary Sources vol.32, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2016.32.6.603
  3. The Study of Odor-causing Compounds Emitted from a Stuffing Agent Production Process vol.27, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5322/JESI.2018.27.9.781